Royal Standard House Standard Hill Nottingham Nottingham City NG1 6FX

This site has had 3 applications since 2024: 1 approved, 0 refused.

• 25/00302/PTPO Awaiting decision

  Royal Standard House Standard Hill Nottingham Nottingham City NG1 6FX

  T1 Acer Pseudoplatanus, insufficient rooting area with a poor quality soil substrate contributing to a reduced overall lifespan coupled with a decreased ability to withstand biotic and abiotic factors. T1 Shows an unfavourable safety of 1.29, accepted calculated safety factor is 1.5. To increase the Safety factor to the 1.5 will require a reduction of a minimum of 2m (8% reduction in height), however with the previously passed cyclical lateral reduction to ensure 1.5m of clearance from the building there is the high likelihood that the combined reduced canopy area will severly compromise the trees health. T2 Acer Pseudoplatanus, insufficient rooting area with a poor quality soil substrate contributing to a reduced overall lifespan coupled with a decreased ability to withstand biotic and abiotic factors. T2 Shows an unfavourable safety of 0.9, accepted calculated safety factor is 1.5. The level of height reduction required to increase the safety factor to 1.5 would require a 4m height reduction, resulting in a significant loss of photosynthetic area and would compromise the tree's health severely. T002 has a non-tolerable risk level when utilising The VALID methodology of Tree risk/benefit and a Tolerable by Agreement risk level if using QTRA. As we cannot impart an "agreement" with passing vehicles or pedestrians this risk level must be downgraded to "risk will not ordinarily be tolerable".

  Submitted 19 Feb 2025 Trees
• 24/02217/PWC Granted

  Royal Standard House Standard Hill Nottingham Nottingham City NG1 6FX

  Removal of 4 Sycamore trees T4-T7 along the southern slope, so far one tree is showing signs of decline caused Cryptostroma corticale and given the proximity to each other and the limited soil volume, infection and death of all the maple species along this line is highly probable. Given the brittle nature of timber in trees that have died from this and the negative effects on the health of workers exposed to the spores of this disease, it is recommended that they be removed during the wetter winter months.

  Decided 28 Jan 2025 Trees

1. 22 Sep 2026

   Received by Nottingham

2. 28 Sep 2026

   Added to PlanIndex

3. Decision

   Awaiting decision

   Decision expected by 17 November 2026, 8 weeks from validation under the statutory target for most applications. Extensions of time are common and are agreed case by case.

   Nottingham took a median of 69 days over the applications it decided in the last year.

This application is with Nottingham for determination, against a statutory target of eight weeks. Over the last year Nottingham's median decision took 69 days. More in our guide to how long planning decisions take.

The published feed does not state which type of application this is; the register entry on Nottingham's portal will say. Our guide explains the common types.

• Royal Standard House Standard Hill Nottingham Nottingham City NG1 6FX

  25/00302/PTPO Submitted 19 Feb 2025 50 yards away

  97% historically approved · decision due ~16 Apr

  T1 Acer Pseudoplatanus, insufficient rooting area with a poor quality soil substrate contributing to a reduced overall lifespan coupled with a decreased ability to withstand biotic and abiotic factors. T1 Shows an unfavourable safety of 1.29, accepted calculated safety factor is 1.5. To increase the Safety factor to the 1.5 will require a reduction of a minimum of 2m (8% reduction in height), however with the previously passed cyclical lateral reduction to ensure 1.5m of clearance from the building there is the high likelihood that the combined reduced canopy area will severly compromise the trees health. T2 Acer Pseudoplatanus, insufficient rooting area with a poor quality soil substrate contributing to a reduced overall lifespan coupled with a decreased ability to withstand biotic and abiotic factors. T2 Shows an unfavourable safety of 0.9, accepted calculated safety factor is 1.5. The level of height reduction required to increase the safety factor to 1.5 would require a 4m height reduction, resulting in a significant loss of photosynthetic area and would compromise the tree's health severely. T002 has a non-tolerable risk level when utilising The VALID methodology of Tree risk/benefit and a Tolerable by Agreement risk level if using QTRA. As we cannot impart an "agreement" with passing vehicles or pedestrians this risk level must be downgraded to "risk will not ordinarily be tolerable".

  Awaiting decision Trees 3 docs

• Royal Standard House Standard Hill Nottingham Nottingham City NG1 6FX

  24/02217/PWC Submitted 17 Dec 2024 50 yards away

  Removal of 4 Sycamore trees T4-T7 along the southern slope, so far one tree is showing signs of decline caused Cryptostroma corticale and given the proximity to each other and the limited soil volume, infection and death of all the maple species along this line is highly probable. Given the brittle nature of timber in trees that have died from this and the negative effects on the health of workers exposed to the spores of this disease, it is recommended that they be removed during the wetter winter months.

  Granted Trees 3 docs

• 4C Park Valley Nottingham Nottingham City NG7 1BQ

  22/02490/PFUL3 Submitted 23 Dec 2022 50 yards away

  New windows to ground floor and new front door. Reconfiguration of entrance area and infill ground floor extension.

  Granted Full applications Extension Windows or glazing 7 docs

• 8 Park Valley Nottingham Nottingham City NG7 1BQ

  24/00921/PWC Submitted 3 Jun 2024 50 yards away

  97% historically approved · decision due ~29 Jul

  Front garden mature Willow (salix alba) with ground-level co-dominant stem. The willow presents with a heavy lean towards a footpath that gives access to and from the residence. The customer is concerned with lean but would like to to retain the tree in-situ as it adds considerable value to the property and local amenity. The customer is against removal would prefer the tree not to pollarded as it would adversely alter the trees character and lose the privacy it provides from neighbouring properties. To help retain the tree in its position a considerable crown reduction is suggested by a) Significantly shortening the leaning primary stem to its marked point on photograph 4. It is hoped that reducing most significant area of loading it will alleviate pressure on the ground level co-dominant union and extend the lifetime of the tree. Routine maintenance of epicormic growth will then be required to manage the future regrowth from this pruning point. b) Pruning, shaping and thinning of the retained upper canopy is suggested to help form a more centralised canopy above union and retain customers wishes for privacy. The smaller footprint of the tree would also be beneficial if the union was to fail in the future as it would be away from footpaths. c) The leaders from the other co-dominant stem currently interfere with other trees and extend over the steps and gate to be reduced back to tie in with the new canopies shape from works of point a) and b). d) The tree currently requires routine maintenance of dead-wooding throughout the crown(s).

  Awaiting decision Trees 7 docs

• Valley House Park Valley Nottingham Nottingham City NG7 1BQ

  22/01557/PTPO Submitted 10 Aug 2022 50 yards away

  Works: T1. Robinia - fell and grind - Replant with species to be decided Justification: Significant dieback in crown, limb failed at 8m, crack on stem & decay on limb. Limp split at 9m, approx 50% remaining sound wood

  Granted Trees 3 docs

• Arundel House 1 Park Valley Nottingham

  24/01670/5DAY Submitted 19 Sep 2024 100 yards away

  Remove failed limb from fractured willow tree, pollard or fell remaining stem.

  Decided Trees 2 docs