Planning application
23 Shepherds Hill, Hornsey, London, N6 5QJ
Still open. Anyone can comment while the consultation period runs, and comments go to the council rather than to us.
Proposal
Works to trees protected by a TPO. T2 Sycamore - Fell and treat stump with eco-plugs 1. The above tree works are proposed as a remedy to the differential foundation movement at the insured property and to ensure the long-term stability of the building. 2. The above tree works are proposed to limit the extent and need for expensive and disruptive engineering repair works at the insured property. In this instance the estimated repair costs are likely to vary between £20,000 and £150,000, depending upon whether the tree/s can be removed or must remain. 3. The above tree works are proposed to limit the extent and need for costly CO2e emissions relating to alternative engineering repair works at the insured property. A typical underpinning scheme can include a carbon cost of more than 6000 kg CO2e and soil stabilisation or root barriers more than 4000 kg CO2e. A typical tree might capture between 15-40kg CO2e per annum and would therefore take centuries to mitigate the cost in CO2e on any alternative. We also confirm that the applicant has included this scheme and application in its tree planting and carbon capture off-set scheme for trees causing subsidence to low rise buildings which has already seen some 11,000 trees planted and additionally 220 tonnes of carbon captured. 4. The above tree works are proposed to limit the duration of any claim period and therefore allow the landowner their right to the peaceful enjoyment of their property. 5. It is the case that an alternative to felling such as pruning or significant ‘pollarding’ of the tree would not provide a reliable or sustainable remedy to the subsidence in this case. We do not consider that any other potential means of mitigation, including root barriers, would be effective or appropriate in the circumstances. 6. We are satisfied that the evidence obtained following completion of our Arboricultural Implication Assessment report completed 20/01/2023 clearly links the Sycamore T2 as a cause of damage to the risk address. 7. Insurers understanding the requirement to offer replacement planting in the event consent to fell is granted.
As published by the council, reference HGY/2026/2311
Application record
- Reference
- HGY/2026/2311
- Type
- Consent under Tree Preservation Orders
- Status
- Under Consultation
- Received
- 17 Aug 2026
- Validated
- 17 Aug 2026
- Ward
- Highgate
- Decision by
- Delegated Decision
- Postcode
- N6 5QJ
Timeline
Dates from the published record
-
17 Aug 2026
Received by Haringey
-
22 Aug 2026
Added to PlanIndex
-
Decision
Awaiting decision
Decision expected by 12 October 2026, 8 weeks from validation under the statutory target for most applications. Extensions of time are common and are agreed case by case.
Haringey took a median of 55 days over the applications it decided in the last year.
Documents
Plans, drawings, consultee responses and the officer's report
10 documents on file for this application
A planning file usually holds the application form, drawings and site plans, consultee responses, the officer's report and the decision notice.
Watch members (£5 a month) open the document list from here.
Open the documentsWhat happens while it is decided
This application is with Haringey for determination, against a statutory target of eight weeks. Over the last year Haringey decided tree works applications in a median of 24 days. More in our guide to how long planning decisions take.
About tree works applications
Applications for works to trees cover protected trees: consent under a tree preservation order, or six weeks notice for trees in a conservation area. More in our guide to planning application types.
Nearby applications
Within 0.3 miles
-
11 Shepherds Hill, Hornsey, London, N6 5QJ
99% historically approved · decision due ~14 Aug
T6 - work to a non-TPO Sycamore. Increase crown height by 1-1.5m. Changes indicated on photo of tree.
Awaiting decision Trees 4 docs -
13 Shepherds Hill, Hornsey, London, N6 5QJ
Proposed enlargement of single lower ground floor rear window / door opening. Installation of 2 no. flat glass rooflights in existing rear roof terrace. Removal of 1 no. window to side elevation and infilled in brickwork to match existing. Change to garden levels and removal of shrubbery to create enlarged lawn area.
Refused Householder Loft or dormer Windows or glazing 15 docsSeveral homes -
25 Shepherds Hill, Hornsey, London, N6 5QJ
99% historically approved · decision due ~12 Oct
Works to tree protected by a TPO. T8 Sycamore - Fell and treat stump with eco-plugs 1. The above tree works are proposed as a remedy to the differential foundation movement at the insured property and to ensure the long-term stability of the building. 2. The above tree works are proposed to limit the extent and need for expensive and disruptive engineering repair works at the insured property. In this instance the estimated repair costs are likely to vary between £20,000 and £150,000, depending upon whether the tree/s can be removed or must remain. 3. The above tree works are proposed to limit the extent and need for costly CO2e emissions relating to alternative engineering repair works at the insured property. A typical underpinning scheme can include a carbon cost of more than 6000 kg CO2e and soil stabilisation or root barriers more than 4000 kg CO2e. A typical tree might capture between 15-40kg CO2e per annum and would therefore take centuries to mitigate the cost in CO2e on any alternative. We also confirm that the applicant has included this scheme and application in its tree planting and carbon capture off-set scheme for trees causing subsidence to low rise buildings which has already seen some 11,000 trees planted and additionally 220 tonnes of carbon captured. 4. The above tree works are proposed to limit the duration of any claim period and therefore allow the landowner their right to the peaceful enjoyment of their property. 5. It is the case that an alternative to felling such as pruning or significant ‘pollarding’ of the tree would not provide a reliable or sustainable remedy to the subsidence in this case. We do not consider that any other potential means of mitigation, including root barriers, would be effective or appropriate in the circumstances. 6. We are satisfied that the evidence obtained following completion of our Arboricultural Implication Assessment report completed 20/01/2023 clearly links the Sycamore T8 as a cause of damage to the risk address. 7. Insurers understanding the requirement to offer replacement planting in the event consent to fell is granted.
Awaiting decision Trees 10 docs -
45b Shepherds Hill, Hornsey, London, N6 5QJ
Five Day Notice. The tree is located on the roadside boundary of 45b shepherds hill, Highgate, London, n65qj. The tree in question is a Sycamore tree showing extensive deadwood and historical damage at the base. The tree due to its location adjacent to the footpath and main road I believe posses a risk to third party members of the public. If I thought there was a chance of the tree living I would suggest a heavy reduction/pollard but as the photos show the die back is extensive. I am asking for permission to fell the tree to ground level.
Granted Trees 5 docs -
11 Shepherds Hill, Hornsey, London, N6 5QJ
T1 - Willow. Bring tree to within boundary of 11 Shepherds Hill. Currently substantially overhangs into 9 Shepherds Hill, and risks damaging their roof. T2 - honey locust. Reduce height of tree by 3m so that it does not damage the building at 11 Shepherds Hill. Currently it overhangs and risks damaging a flat roof.
Granted Trees 5 docs -
45 Shepherds Hill, Hornsey, London, N6 5QJ
Reduce height of both yews (T1 & T2) by 2m and trim overhang over client's drive and growing towards house, keeping in line with lower section, raise crown of larger yew (T3) to 3.5m over pavement, reduce branches over client's drive by 1.5m. Reason for works is to let more light into both the properties, to restrict the root growth, and to reduce the debris falling on the driveway.
Granted Trees 6 docs
Other tree works applications
In Haringey
-
HGY/2026/2783 Granted
26 Palace Road, Hornsey, London, N8 8QJ
Five Day Notice. The Horse Chestnut at 26 Palace Road N8 8QJ - dead and losing branches - remove.
-
HGY/2026/2786 Awaiting decision
80C St James's Lane, Hornsey, London, N10 3RD
Rear Garden: T1: Mature Lime: Approximately 13.00m: Growing between No.53 The Chine and The corner of No.80c St.James Lane. Reduce back to previous and most recent points of reduction, approximately 1.50m-1.70m all round. Raise crown over the boundary fences to clear. Ensure a minimum of 2.00m clearance of the building. Remove major dead wood. Thin crown density by approximately 20%. General maintenance/Control encroachment.
-
HGY/2026/2772 Awaiting decision
Grove Works, St Anns Road, Tottenham, London, N15 5RP
Dawn Redwood. Tree T1 on Sketch Plan. Arboriculturist Conclusion "Given the presence of cracks in the wall of adjacent buildings, and the close proximity of the tree to the buildings, it is recommended that T1 is removed to ground level." Engineer's Conclusion "the best course of action to avoid any further movement on the existing building would be to remove the existing tree and underpin the existing foundation"
-
HGY/2026/2780 Awaiting decision
26 Claremont Road, Hornsey, London, N6 5BY
1) Eucalyptus in rear garden: Reduce overall crown by up to 3 metres back to previous reduction framework.
-
HGY/2026/2127 Granted
Pembury House Nursery, Lansdowne Road, Tottenham, London, N17 9XE
Ginkgo (T1) - fell. Reason: this is a female tree, that drops fruit all over the nursery playground. The children try to eat them, it gets into their clothes, shoes, hands, and all over the class room, creating an extremely unpleasant environment for the children and staff. Replant with another deciduous tree with similar potential size canopy (eg. Norway maple) Sycamore (T2) - Reduce the height of the tree by 4m. Reduce lateral branches in line with this (up to 2.5m). Reason: There is some decay at the base of the tree on the east side, spanning 40% of the circumference of the tree. The bark is flaking from ground level up to 1.5m, and use of the sounding mallet indicates the dysfunctional wood extends at least to the same height. The tree has a full crown, but has had selective branch length reductions in the past. The crown overhangs the nursery playground and neighbouring parking area. Lime x2 (T10 & T11) - Crown raise to 4m, removing epicormic growth. Reason: to remove the branches that touch the shelter to prevent damage.