Skip to content
PlanIndex Get alerts
Menu

Planning application

13 Shepherds Hill, Hornsey, London, N6 5QJ

Refused Haringey HGY/2023/0252 Householder planning permission

Works: Loft or dormer Windows or glazing Several homes

Read from the description, not a valuation. How we read the register

Refused. Only the applicant can appeal, within the statutory time limit, and a revised scheme can be submitted instead.

Proposal

Proposed enlargement of single lower ground floor rear window / door opening. Installation of 2 no. flat glass rooflights in existing rear roof terrace. Removal of 1 no. window to side elevation and infilled in brickwork to match existing. Change to garden levels and removal of shrubbery to create enlarged lawn area.

As published by the council, reference HGY/2023/0252

Application record

Reference
HGY/2023/0252
Type
Householder planning permission
Status
Decision Made
Decision
Refuse
Received
25 Jan 2023
Validated
25 Jan 2023
Decided
22 Mar 2023
Ward
Highgate
Decision by
Delegated Decision
Postcode
N6 5QJ

Timeline

Dates from the published record

  1. 25 Jan 2023

    Received by Haringey

  2. 22 Mar 2023

    Decision issued: Refuse

  3. 28 Jul 2026

    Added to PlanIndex

Documents

Plans, drawings, consultee responses and the officer's report

15 documents on file for this application

A planning file usually holds the application form, drawings and site plans, consultee responses, the officer's report and the decision notice.

Trade members open them from here.

Open the documents

What this refusal means

Haringey refused this application for the reasons on the decision notice; only the applicant can appeal, and refused schemes often return in revised form. More in our guide to what happens after a planning decision.

About householder applications

Householder applications cover work to an existing house and its garden, such as extensions, lofts and outbuildings, and cannot create a separate dwelling or change what the building is used for. More in our guide to planning application types.

Nearby applications

Within 500 metres

  • 11 Shepherds Hill, Hornsey, London, N6 5QJ

    HGY/2026/1757 Submitted 19 Jun 2026 0m away

    99% historically approved · decision due ~14 Aug

    T6 - work to a non-TPO Sycamore. Increase crown height by 1-1.5m. Changes indicated on photo of tree.

    Awaiting decision Trees 4 docs
  • 25 Shepherds Hill, Hornsey, London, N6 5QJ

    HGY/2026/2312 Submitted 17 Aug 2026 0m away

    99% historically approved · decision due ~12 Oct

    Works to tree protected by a TPO. T8 Sycamore - Fell and treat stump with eco-plugs 1. The above tree works are proposed as a remedy to the differential foundation movement at the insured property and to ensure the long-term stability of the building. 2. The above tree works are proposed to limit the extent and need for expensive and disruptive engineering repair works at the insured property. In this instance the estimated repair costs are likely to vary between £20,000 and £150,000, depending upon whether the tree/s can be removed or must remain. 3. The above tree works are proposed to limit the extent and need for costly CO2e emissions relating to alternative engineering repair works at the insured property. A typical underpinning scheme can include a carbon cost of more than 6000 kg CO2e and soil stabilisation or root barriers more than 4000 kg CO2e. A typical tree might capture between 15-40kg CO2e per annum and would therefore take centuries to mitigate the cost in CO2e on any alternative. We also confirm that the applicant has included this scheme and application in its tree planting and carbon capture off-set scheme for trees causing subsidence to low rise buildings which has already seen some 11,000 trees planted and additionally 220 tonnes of carbon captured. 4. The above tree works are proposed to limit the duration of any claim period and therefore allow the landowner their right to the peaceful enjoyment of their property. 5. It is the case that an alternative to felling such as pruning or significant ‘pollarding’ of the tree would not provide a reliable or sustainable remedy to the subsidence in this case. We do not consider that any other potential means of mitigation, including root barriers, would be effective or appropriate in the circumstances. 6. We are satisfied that the evidence obtained following completion of our Arboricultural Implication Assessment report completed 20/01/2023 clearly links the Sycamore T8 as a cause of damage to the risk address. 7. Insurers understanding the requirement to offer replacement planting in the event consent to fell is granted.

    Awaiting decision Trees 10 docs
  • 23 Shepherds Hill, Hornsey, London, N6 5QJ

    HGY/2026/2311 Submitted 17 Aug 2026 0m away

    99% historically approved · decision due ~12 Oct

    Works to trees protected by a TPO. T2 Sycamore - Fell and treat stump with eco-plugs 1. The above tree works are proposed as a remedy to the differential foundation movement at the insured property and to ensure the long-term stability of the building. 2. The above tree works are proposed to limit the extent and need for expensive and disruptive engineering repair works at the insured property. In this instance the estimated repair costs are likely to vary between £20,000 and £150,000, depending upon whether the tree/s can be removed or must remain. 3. The above tree works are proposed to limit the extent and need for costly CO2e emissions relating to alternative engineering repair works at the insured property. A typical underpinning scheme can include a carbon cost of more than 6000 kg CO2e and soil stabilisation or root barriers more than 4000 kg CO2e. A typical tree might capture between 15-40kg CO2e per annum and would therefore take centuries to mitigate the cost in CO2e on any alternative. We also confirm that the applicant has included this scheme and application in its tree planting and carbon capture off-set scheme for trees causing subsidence to low rise buildings which has already seen some 11,000 trees planted and additionally 220 tonnes of carbon captured. 4. The above tree works are proposed to limit the duration of any claim period and therefore allow the landowner their right to the peaceful enjoyment of their property. 5. It is the case that an alternative to felling such as pruning or significant ‘pollarding’ of the tree would not provide a reliable or sustainable remedy to the subsidence in this case. We do not consider that any other potential means of mitigation, including root barriers, would be effective or appropriate in the circumstances. 6. We are satisfied that the evidence obtained following completion of our Arboricultural Implication Assessment report completed 20/01/2023 clearly links the Sycamore T2 as a cause of damage to the risk address. 7. Insurers understanding the requirement to offer replacement planting in the event consent to fell is granted.

    Awaiting decision Trees 10 docs
  • 45b Shepherds Hill, Hornsey, London, N6 5QJ

    HGY/2025/3043 Submitted 6 Nov 2025 0m away

    Five Day Notice. The tree is located on the roadside boundary of 45b shepherds hill, Highgate, London, n65qj. The tree in question is a Sycamore tree showing extensive deadwood and historical damage at the base. The tree due to its location adjacent to the footpath and main road I believe posses a risk to third party members of the public. If I thought there was a chance of the tree living I would suggest a heavy reduction/pollard but as the photos show the die back is extensive. I am asking for permission to fell the tree to ground level.

    Granted Trees 5 docs
  • 11 Shepherds Hill, Hornsey, London, N6 5QJ

    HGY/2026/0405 Submitted 13 Feb 2026 0m away

    T1 - Willow. Bring tree to within boundary of 11 Shepherds Hill. Currently substantially overhangs into 9 Shepherds Hill, and risks damaging their roof. T2 - honey locust. Reduce height of tree by 3m so that it does not damage the building at 11 Shepherds Hill. Currently it overhangs and risks damaging a flat roof.

    Granted Trees 5 docs
  • Flat A, 5 Shepherds Hill, Hornsey, London, N6 5QJ

    HGY/2026/1969 Submitted 14 Jul 2026 0m away

    T01 - Lime tree - re-pollard to previous reduction points. T02 - Purple Leaf Plum - reduction and reshape. T03 - Self-set Sycamores growing out from under decking - cut to ground level.

    Granted Trees 5 docs

In Haringey

  • HGY/2026/2282 Awaiting decision

    77 Falkland Road, Hornsey, London, N8 0NS

    Single storey side and rear extension.

    14 Sep 2026 Householder
  • HGY/2026/2059 Granted

    21 Shanklin Road, Hornsey, London, N8 8TJ

    Single Storey Rear Extension

    20 Jul 2026 Householder
  • HGY/2026/2162 Granted

    71 Fairfax Road, Hornsey, London, N8 0NH

    Erection of L-shaped rear dormer; erection of single storey rear extension; 2 no. front roof lights.

    30 Jul 2026 Householder
  • HGY/2026/1895 Granted

    396 St Anns Road, Tottenham, London, N15 3ST

    Erection of single storey side infill extension, formation of dormer window and insertion of 4 nos. rooflights (3no. front facing and 1no. rear facing).

    17 Jul 2026 Householder
  • HGY/2026/1959 Granted

    10 Roseberry Gardens, Tottenham, London, N4 1JJ

    Erection of a single storey rear and side wraparound extension, formation of dormer window and insertion of 3 nos. rooflights to front roof slope (amended).

    17 Jul 2026 Householder