Skip to content
PlanIndex Get alerts
Menu

Planning application

56 Lechlade Road Faringdon Oxfordshire SN7 8AQ

Decided Vale of White Horse P11/V2376 Minor

Works: New dwelling Domestic

Read from the description, not a valuation. How we read the register

Decided. The decision notice on the council portal carries the outcome in full, including any conditions.

Proposal

Erection of a detached dwelling and single garage. (Land to rear of 56 Lechlade Road)

As published by the council, reference P11/V2376

Application record

Reference
P11/V2376
Type
Minor
Status
Permitted
Decision
Planning Permission
Received
29 Sep 2011
Validated
7 Oct 2011
Decided
30 Nov 2011
Postcode
SN7 8AQ

Site history

Applications at this address on the Vale of White Horse register

This site has had 5 applications since 2010: 0 approved, 1 refused.

  • P11/V2799 Decided

    56 Lechlade Road Faringdon Oxfordshire SN7 8AQ

    Erection of a detached dwelling. (Re-submission of withdrawn application 11/01458/FUL)

    Decided 26 Jan 2012
  • P11/V1458 Withdrawn

    56 Lechlade Road Faringdon Oxfordshire SN7 8AQ

    Proposed erection of detached dwelling.

    Decided 6 Sep 2011
  • P10/V1850 Withdrawn

    56 Lechlade Road Faringdon Oxfordshire SN7 8AQ

    To construct 1 x 2 storey 5 bed dwelling with detached single garage (land to rear of 56 Lechlade Road). A new access road to be constructed from adjacent Woodview.

    Decided 10 Jun 2013
  • P10/V1758 Refused

    56 Lechlade Road Faringdon Oxfordshire SN7 8AQ

    Proposed erection of a detached dwelling

    Decided 10 Nov 2010

Timeline

Dates from the published record

  1. 29 Sep 2011

    Received by Vale of White Horse

  2. 7 Oct 2011

    Validated

    Checked as complete and ready for consideration.

  3. 30 Nov 2011

    Decision issued: Planning Permission

  4. 25 Aug 2026

    Added to PlanIndex

Cases linked to this one on the register

1 later application on the register refers to this one:

  • P13/V1205/DIS Decided

    Land to rear of 56 Lechlade Road Faringdon Oxon SN7 8AQ

    Application for discharge of conditions 2,3,5,7 and 8 of planning permission P11/V2376

    Decided 27 Sep 2013 Conditions

Documents

Plans, drawings, consultee responses and the officer's report

19 documents on file for this application

A planning file usually holds the application form, drawings and site plans, consultee responses, the officer's report and the decision notice.

Trade members open them from here.

Open the documents

After the decision

Vale of White Horse has decided this application; the outcome above is the register's own wording and the decision notice on the council portal carries the detail. More in our guide to what happens after a planning decision.

About this record

The published feed does not state which type of application this is; the register entry on Vale of White Horse's portal will say. Our guide explains the common types.

Nearby applications

Within 500 metres

  • 56 Lechlade Road Faringdon Oxfordshire SN7 8AQ

    P10/V1758 Submitted 15 Sep 2010 0m away

    Proposed erection of a detached dwelling

    Refused New dwelling 17 docs
    Domestic
  • 56 Lechlade Road Faringdon SN7 8AQ

    P14/V2010/LDP Submitted 1 Sep 2014 2m away

    Certificate of lawfulness for a proposed single storey rear extension.

    Decided Lawful development Extension 5 docs
    Small domestic
  • Land to rear of 56 Lechlade Road Faringdon Oxon SN7 8AQ

    P13/V1205/DIS Submitted 30 May 2013 35m away

    Application for discharge of conditions 2,3,5,7 and 8 of planning permission P11/V2376

    Decided Conditions 8 docs
  • 56 Lechlade Road Faringdon Oxfordshire SN7 8AQ

    P10/V1850 Submitted 2 Oct 2010 43m away

    To construct 1 x 2 storey 5 bed dwelling with detached single garage (land to rear of 56 Lechlade Road). A new access road to be constructed from adjacent Woodview.

    Withdrawn 16 docs
    Domestic
  • Leylands, Lechlade Road, Faringdon, SN7 8AQ

    P26/V0771/TCA Submitted 29 Mar 2026 68m away

    G1 Silver Birch x8 - reduce heights by approx. 5m. Our client would like more light in front garden as well as neighbouring gardening adjacent to their property, which are overshadowed by the trees. Due to the close proximity and size of the gardens mentioned, this is why my clients would like a significant height reduction.

    Decided Trees 2 docs
  • 56 Lechlade Road, Faringdon, Oxon, SN7 8AQ

    P13/V2782/TCA Submitted 15 Mar 2013 68m away

    T1 - Lime T2 - Lime T1 is a Lime, 23.5m in ht & with a breast height dia. of approx 1200mm. It is growing against the boundary wall, which has partially collapsed. There is a dense basal growth around the stem making inspection of the base adjacent to the wall impossible. T1 is growing as a pair with T2. It is a mature tree in good condition. The tree contains an awkward 4-way fork at 18m, which is a point of potential structural weakness.There is minor die back at branch extremities & a number of larger dead branches within the crown. There is a dead branch, with a diameter of approx 125mm located over the shed.There is extensive epicormic growth and the crown is congested. T2 is a Lime, 26m in ht & with a breast height dia. of approx 1000mm. The tree is growing as a pair with T1, sharing an overall crown shape.The tree has a reasonable crown structure, but with dense epicormic growth & congested crown. Both trees are in reasonable condition, although they have reached maturity & there is minor die-back beginning at branch extremities. The trees are growing as a pair, with an overlapping crown shape.They are important trees in the landscape. They should be treated in the same way to maintain the overall crown shape.There is a risk of dead wood falling from both trees, & a possibility of branches breaking out of the crown of T1 from the awkward fork noted above. Lime responded well to crown reduction & there is ample branch growth in the crowns of these trees to maintain good crown shape if reduced. It is recommended that the crowns of both trees should be reduced by 20%, with any dead, dying or broken branches being removed. Basal growth around the base of T1 and epicormic growth from both trees should also be removed.This work will reduce the risk of branches being shed and reduce die-back at branch extremities. To make trees safe over the building site and school. Developer is offering to have the work carried out as he wants it to be done even though they belong to the school. Remarks:

    Decided Trees 3 docs
    Small domestic