Planning application
56 Lechlade Road Faringdon Oxfordshire SN7 8AQ
Works: New dwelling Domestic
Read from the description, not a valuation. How we read the register
Refused. Only the applicant can appeal, within the statutory time limit, and a revised scheme can be submitted instead.
Proposal
Proposed erection of a detached dwelling
As published by the council, reference P10/V1758
Application record
- Reference
- P10/V1758
- Type
- Minor
- Status
- Rejected
- Decision
- Refusal of Planning Permission
- Received
- 15 Sep 2010
- Validated
- 16 Sep 2010
- Decided
- 10 Nov 2010
- Postcode
- SN7 8AQ
Site history
Applications at this address on the Vale of White Horse register
This site has had 5 applications since 2010: 0 approved, 1 refused.
-
P11/V2799 Decided
56 Lechlade Road Faringdon Oxfordshire SN7 8AQ
Erection of a detached dwelling. (Re-submission of withdrawn application 11/01458/FUL)
-
P11/V2376 Decided
56 Lechlade Road Faringdon Oxfordshire SN7 8AQ
Erection of a detached dwelling and single garage. (Land to rear of 56 Lechlade Road)
-
P11/V1458 Withdrawn
56 Lechlade Road Faringdon Oxfordshire SN7 8AQ
Proposed erection of detached dwelling.
-
P10/V1850 Withdrawn
56 Lechlade Road Faringdon Oxfordshire SN7 8AQ
To construct 1 x 2 storey 5 bed dwelling with detached single garage (land to rear of 56 Lechlade Road). A new access road to be constructed from adjacent Woodview.
Timeline
Dates from the published record
-
15 Sep 2010
Received by Vale of White Horse
-
16 Sep 2010
Validated
Checked as complete and ready for consideration.
-
10 Nov 2010
Decision issued: Refusal of Planning Permission
-
9 Sep 2026
Added to PlanIndex
Documents
Plans, drawings, consultee responses and the officer's report
17 documents on file for this application
A planning file usually holds the application form, drawings and site plans, consultee responses, the officer's report and the decision notice.
Trade members open them from here.
Open the documentsWhat this refusal means
Vale of White Horse refused this application for the reasons on the decision notice; only the applicant can appeal, and refused schemes often return in revised form. More in our guide to what happens after a planning decision.
About this record
The published feed does not state which type of application this is; the register entry on Vale of White Horse's portal will say. Our guide explains the common types.
Nearby applications
Within 500 metres
-
56 Lechlade Road Faringdon Oxfordshire SN7 8AQ
Erection of a detached dwelling and single garage. (Land to rear of 56 Lechlade Road)
Decided New dwelling 19 docsDomestic -
56 Lechlade Road Faringdon SN7 8AQ
Certificate of lawfulness for a proposed single storey rear extension.
Decided Lawful development Extension 5 docsSmall domestic -
Land to rear of 56 Lechlade Road Faringdon Oxon SN7 8AQ
Application for discharge of conditions 2,3,5,7 and 8 of planning permission P11/V2376
Decided Conditions 8 docs -
56 Lechlade Road Faringdon Oxfordshire SN7 8AQ
To construct 1 x 2 storey 5 bed dwelling with detached single garage (land to rear of 56 Lechlade Road). A new access road to be constructed from adjacent Woodview.
Withdrawn 16 docsDomestic -
Leylands, Lechlade Road, Faringdon, SN7 8AQ
G1 Silver Birch x8 - reduce heights by approx. 5m. Our client would like more light in front garden as well as neighbouring gardening adjacent to their property, which are overshadowed by the trees. Due to the close proximity and size of the gardens mentioned, this is why my clients would like a significant height reduction.
Decided Trees 2 docs -
56 Lechlade Road, Faringdon, Oxon, SN7 8AQ
T1 - Lime T2 - Lime T1 is a Lime, 23.5m in ht & with a breast height dia. of approx 1200mm. It is growing against the boundary wall, which has partially collapsed. There is a dense basal growth around the stem making inspection of the base adjacent to the wall impossible. T1 is growing as a pair with T2. It is a mature tree in good condition. The tree contains an awkward 4-way fork at 18m, which is a point of potential structural weakness.There is minor die back at branch extremities & a number of larger dead branches within the crown. There is a dead branch, with a diameter of approx 125mm located over the shed.There is extensive epicormic growth and the crown is congested. T2 is a Lime, 26m in ht & with a breast height dia. of approx 1000mm. The tree is growing as a pair with T1, sharing an overall crown shape.The tree has a reasonable crown structure, but with dense epicormic growth & congested crown. Both trees are in reasonable condition, although they have reached maturity & there is minor die-back beginning at branch extremities. The trees are growing as a pair, with an overlapping crown shape.They are important trees in the landscape. They should be treated in the same way to maintain the overall crown shape.There is a risk of dead wood falling from both trees, & a possibility of branches breaking out of the crown of T1 from the awkward fork noted above. Lime responded well to crown reduction & there is ample branch growth in the crowns of these trees to maintain good crown shape if reduced. It is recommended that the crowns of both trees should be reduced by 20%, with any dead, dying or broken branches being removed. Basal growth around the base of T1 and epicormic growth from both trees should also be removed.This work will reduce the risk of branches being shed and reduce die-back at branch extremities. To make trees safe over the building site and school. Developer is offering to have the work carried out as he wants it to be done even though they belong to the school. Remarks:
Decided Trees 3 docsSmall domestic