Planning application
2 Temple Gardens Moor Park Rickmansworth Hertfordshire WD3 1QJ
Works: Trees
Still open. Anyone can comment while the consultation period runs, and comments go to the council rather than to us.
Proposal
5 Day Notice for Dead Tree Front Garden T1) Pine (dead) Fell to ground level
As published by the council, reference 26/1003/DDD
Application record
- Reference
- 26/1003/DDD
- Status
- Unknown
- Received
- 18 Jun 2026
- Validated
- 18 Jun 2026
- Postcode
- WD3 1QJ
Timeline
Dates from the published record
-
18 Jun 2026
Received by Three Rivers
-
24 Jul 2026
Added to PlanIndex
-
8 Aug 2026
Status changed to Unknown
Previously Permitted.
-
Decision
Awaiting decision
Decision expected by 13 August 2026, 8 weeks from validation under the statutory target for most applications. Extensions of time are common and are agreed case by case.
Three Rivers took a median of 56 days over the applications it decided in the last year.
What happens while it is decided
This application is with Three Rivers for determination, against a statutory target of eight weeks. Over the last year Three Rivers's median decision took 56 days. More in our guide to how long planning decisions take.
About this record
The published feed does not state which type of application this is; the register entry on Three Rivers's portal will say. Our guide explains the common types.
Nearby applications
Within 0.3 miles
-
Redwood House 12 Temple Gardens Moor Park Rickmansworth Hertfordshire WD3 1QJ
89% historically approved · decision due ~16 Sep
Construction of detached garage, greenhouse and bin store, alterations to driveway; construction of new access gate to garage area; alterations to hard and soft landscaping; drainage and irrigation tank and external lighting.
Decided Full applications 55 docs -
Hill House 7 Temple Gardens Moor Park Rickmansworth Hertfordshire WD3 1QJ
FIVE-DAY NOTICE T1 - Sierra Redwood x 1 - reduce lateral branches growing from broken stem stub by 2.5-3m to alleviate weight and stress on the damaged area Reasons: hazardous, the tree is split and beginning to fail
Granted Trees 2 docs -
5 Temple Gardens Moor Park Rickmansworth Hertfordshire WD3 1QJ
T1 and T2: Silver Birch . Dead trees . Remove to ground. T3: Sweet Chestnut. Remove large dead limb over drive. T4: Cedar : Reduce lateral growth over roof to clear all materials of property by approx 1m. All work is safety related.
Decided Trees 8 docs -
3 Temple Gardens Moor Park Rickmansworth Hertfordshire WD3 1QJ
Various tree works
Refused Trees 16 docs -
Hill House 7 Temple Gardens Moor Park Rickmansworth Hertfordshire WD3 1QJ
TG2 Sycamore X2 group - left side of house Sectional dismantle using rigging equipment the large TG2 Sycamore X2 group located at the left side of house. Leave stump low. Remove resulting debris. REASONS: *The trees are so large now that they are destroying the original 1930s hedge and large branches frequently fall, probably due to squirrel damage, causing damage to the outhouse and washing line. *The trees are less than 5 meters from the house and we have already had to underpin the part nearest to the trees. *The lack of any 'amenity value' is also highlighted by the fact that they are not only on private property but not visible to the general public as Temple Gardens is a private road owned by the house-owners with no rights of way. The only person who can see the trees is our neighbour and he wants them cut down as well
Granted Trees 5 docs -
Templewood 8 Temple Gardens Moor Park Rickmansworth Hertfordshire WD3 1QJ
T4 - Beech x 1 - reduce by 4m on height Reasons: : The beech tree has been historically reduced in height and spread and consequently is now structurally challenged in discrete areas such that some decay is present and incidences of branch break have occurred. G4 - Sycamore x 2 - fell to ground level Reasons:These are self-seeded volunteers that have arisen within the boundary hedge. Doctor Pendlebury reports that in 2004 alone 6-8 significantly-sized branches have fallen from the trees into his garden, more than one have apparently struck the building. Naturally, Doctor Pendlebury is concerned about the safety implications of these occurrences and feels that the trees should be removed to reduce his liabilities under the Occupiers Liability Act 1957 (as amended 1984) and his further responsibilities under the Common Law Duty of Care.
Refused Trees 3 docs