Skip to content
PlanIndex Get alerts
Menu

Planning application

7 Caxton Avenue Rowtown Addlestone KT15 1LJ

Decided Runnymede RU.25/1450 Trees

Works: Trees

Decided. The decision notice on the council portal carries the outcome in full, including any conditions.

Proposal

Conservation Area Tree Works - Mature Sycamore tree with 4 main trunks. Whole tree is dead (drought) and needs to be removed. Tree surgeon to be used to remove to ground level. (note Pseudo Acacia Robinia adjacent to be retained).

As published by the council, reference RU.25/1450

Application record

Reference
RU.25/1450
Type
Trees
Status
Officers Comments As published: FINAL DECISION
Decision
Officers Comments
Received
13 Oct 2025
Validated
13 Oct 2025
Decided
13 Oct 2025
Postcode
KT15 1LJ

Timeline

Dates from the published record

  1. 13 Oct 2025

    Received by Runnymede

  2. 13 Oct 2025

    Decision issued: Officers Comments

  3. 11 Aug 2026

    Added to PlanIndex

Documents

Plans, drawings, consultee responses and the officer's report

5 documents on file for this application

A planning file usually holds the application form, drawings and site plans, consultee responses, the officer's report and the decision notice.

Watch members (£5 a month) open the document list from here.

Open the documents

After the decision

Runnymede has decided this application; the outcome above is the register's own wording and the decision notice on the council portal carries the detail. More in our guide to what happens after a planning decision.

About tree works applications

Applications for works to trees cover protected trees: consent under a tree preservation order, or six weeks notice for trees in a conservation area. More in our guide to planning application types.

Nearby applications

Within 0.3 miles

  • 21 Caxton Avenue Addlestone Surrey KT15 1LJ

    RU.26/0227 Submitted 23 Feb 2026 50 yards away

    T1 - Lime Re- pollard tree by 3 to 4 metres to previous pollard points.

    Granted Trees 6 docs
  • 21 Caxton Avenue Addlestone KT15 1LJ

    RU.24/1079 Submitted 3 Sep 2024 50 yards away

    Single storey part side and rear extension, front porch.

    Granted Extension 12 docs
    Small domestic
  • 20 Caxton Avenue Addlestone KT15 1LJ

    RU.21/0959 Submitted 18 Jun 2021 50 yards away

    Two storey rear extension

    Granted Extension 8 docs
  • 12 Caxton Avenue Addlestone Surrey KT15 1LJ

    RU.26/0534 Submitted 7 May 2026 50 yards away

    Proposed front porch

    Refused Extension 12 docs
    Small domestic
  • Street Record Caxton Avenue Addlestone Surrey KT15 1LJ

    RU.24/1573 Submitted 29 Nov 2024 50 yards away

    Conservation Area Tree Works: (T1 - Sycamore, removal of 3 stems to ground level. Request is due to 1 stem appearing to have died and posing a safety concern, whilst progressing sooty disease on the two 2 others)

    Granted Trees 6 docs
  • 23 Caxton Avenue Addlestone Surrey KT15 1LJ

    RU.26/1009 50 yards away

    81% historically approved

    Robinia - Fell & Remove - to ground level, or as close as possible and remove all arisings. Grind stump. The tree is showing visible signs of decline, with decay evident around the roots. Due to concerns over its long-term health and structural stability, particularly given its proximity to the property and surrounding hard landscaping, the customer would like to remove it before it becomes a safety risk. The customer believes the tree has outgrown its location and is no longer suitable for the space.

    Awaiting decision Trees

In Runnymede

  • RU.26/0594 Refused

    49 Woodham Park Road Addlestone Surrey KT15 3SP

    T1- English Oak (Quercus robur), located in the rear of the property in a Westerly direction. The client proposes a reduction of 3m as part of the trees ongoing management and ensuring it doesn't outgrow its position. The tree is currently 19m high and 25m wide, and will be approximately 16m high and 22m wide following the proposed works.

    Received 14 May, published by the council 30 Jul 2026 Trees
  • RU.26/0595 Decided

    53 Woodham Park Road Addlestone Surrey KT15 3TN

    T1- Silver Birch located in the rear of the property in a Southerly direction. The client proposes a reduction of 3m as part of the trees ongoing management to ensure it doesn't outgrow its position. It is currently 14m high and 4m wide and will be approximately 11m high and 2m wide following the proposed works. T2- Sycamore, 3 Birch & 4 Oak are a cluster of trees loaded at the rear boundary again in a southerly direction. They overhang 49 Woodham Park Roads building and the client would like them cut back by 1m to reduce the squirrels entering the roof of the property. They are currently 8.5m high and 4m wide and will remain 8.5m high and become 3m following the proposed works.

    Received 14 May, published by the council 30 Jul 2026 Trees
  • RU.26/0569 Granted

    4 Simmons Place Staines-upon-thames Surrey TW18 3HW

    T1 Lime - reduce canopy by 1m metres to previous secondary pruning points. Reason - to reduce excessive shading and for the health of the tree.

    Received 14 May, published by the council 30 Jul 2026 Trees
  • RU.26/0605 Granted

    16 Barons Wood Tite Hill Englefield Green Surrey TW20 0ND

    Oak: Crown Reduction - Reducing the height and spread of the tree by up to 1 metre. All arisings to be removed from site. Customer has requested maintenance work to the Oak tree in her garden to ensure it remains a suitable size for the space.

    Received 13 May, published by the council 30 Jul 2026 Trees
  • RU.26/0576 Granted

    71 A Harpesford Avenue Virginia Water Surrey GU25 4RG

    T1 - Oak at front - fell - tree has Acute Oak Decline (AOD) The tree is in advanced decline, almost dead, due AOD evidenced by weeping exudates on the main stem and progressive and advanced canopy dieback monitored over 5+ years. Structural integrity and vitality are now significantly compromised. Given its proximity to the dwelling and highway (high target occupancy), retention presents an unacceptable foreseeable risk of failure and liability under duty of care obligations. Felling is therefore justified on arboricultural safety grounds.

    Received 8 May, published by the council 30 Jul 2026 Trees