Planning application
Land at Syward Place 40-48 Pyrcroft Road Chertsey KT16 9JT
Works: Trees Major scheme
Read from the description, not a valuation. How we read the register
Still open. Anyone can comment while the consultation period runs, and comments go to the council rather than to us.
Proposal
Removal of existing car park ramp off Bell Bridge Road and erection of a residential apartment building (Use Class C3) comprising 46 no. flats with associated site layout amendments, as well as the provision of parking; refuse and recycling storage; substation; landscaping; tree works; public open and informal play space; and alterations to access from Fox Lane North.
As published by the council, reference RU.23/0356
Application record
- Reference
- RU.23/0356
- Type
- Trees
- Status
- REGISTERED
- Received
- 4 Apr 2023
- Validated
- 4 Apr 2023
- Postcode
- KT16 9JT
Timeline
Dates from the published record
-
4 Apr 2023
Received by Runnymede
-
30 Jul 2026
Added to PlanIndex
-
Decision
Awaiting decision
Decision expected by 30 May 2023, 8 weeks from validation under the statutory target for most applications. Extensions of time are common and are agreed case by case.
Runnymede took a median of 46 days over the applications it decided in the last year.
Documents
Plans, drawings, consultee responses and the officer's report
89 documents on file for this application
A planning file usually holds the application form, drawings and site plans, consultee responses, the officer's report and the decision notice.
Trade members open them from here.
Open the documentsWhat happens while it is decided
This application is with Runnymede for determination, against a statutory target of eight weeks. Over the last year Runnymede decided tree works applications in a median of 41 days. More in our guide to how long planning decisions take.
About tree works applications
Applications for works to trees cover protected trees: consent under a tree preservation order, or six weeks notice for trees in a conservation area. More in our guide to planning application types.
Nearby applications
Within 500 metres
-
Syward Place 40 - 48 Pyrcroft Road Chertsey Surrey KT16 9JT
Prior Approval for the proposed upward extension to the existing building to provide an additional two storeys for Class C3 (Dwellinghouses) providing 32 apartments.
Granted Outline New dwelling Extension 43 docsMajor scheme -
Syward Place 40-48 Pyrcroft Road Chertsey KT16 9JT
Non Material Amendment to planning permission RU.21/0704 to add a new condition.
Granted Conditions 4 docs -
Crest House Pyrcroft Road Chertsey Surrey KT16 9GN
Details pursuant to Discharge Condition 3 (Flood risk management and evacuation plan) of planning permission RU.25/1264 (Variation of Condition 3 (Flood Risk Management and Evacuation Plan) of planning permission RU.24/0577).
Granted Conditions 6 docs -
Crest House Pyrcroft Road Chertsey Surrey KT16 9GN
Details pursuant to Discharge Condition 2 (Flood risk management and evacuation plan) of planning permission RU.25/0805 (Variation of Condition 2 (Flood Risk Management and Evacuation Plan) of planning permission RU.24/0329).
Granted Conditions 4 docs -
Crest House Pyrcroft Road Chertsey Surrey KT16 9GN
Variation of Condition 3 (Flood Risk Management and Evacuation Plan) of planning permission RU.24/0577 (Prior Approval Application for an extension to the existing building to provide an additional two storeys to create an additional 22 residential units, under Town and Country Planning (General Permitted Development) (England) Order 2015 (as amended) - Schedule 2, Part 20, Class AA (New dwellinghouses on detached buildings in commercial or mixed use))
Granted Conditions Extension 3 docs -
Crest House Pycroft Road Surrey Chertsey KT16 9GN
Prior approval application for Change of use of part of the ground, first and second floor from Commercial, Business and Service (Use Class E) to form 3 residential units (Use Class C3) under the Town and Country Planning (General Permitted Development) (England) Order 2015 as amended Schedule 2, Part 3, Class MA
Granted Amendments 18 docs
Other tree works applications
In Runnymede
-
RU.26/0594 Refused
49 Woodham Park Road Addlestone Surrey KT15 3SP
T1- English Oak (Quercus robur), located in the rear of the property in a Westerly direction. The client proposes a reduction of 3m as part of the trees ongoing management and ensuring it doesn't outgrow its position. The tree is currently 19m high and 25m wide, and will be approximately 16m high and 22m wide following the proposed works.
-
RU.26/0595 Decided
53 Woodham Park Road Addlestone Surrey KT15 3TN
T1- Silver Birch located in the rear of the property in a Southerly direction. The client proposes a reduction of 3m as part of the trees ongoing management to ensure it doesn't outgrow its position. It is currently 14m high and 4m wide and will be approximately 11m high and 2m wide following the proposed works. T2- Sycamore, 3 Birch & 4 Oak are a cluster of trees loaded at the rear boundary again in a southerly direction. They overhang 49 Woodham Park Roads building and the client would like them cut back by 1m to reduce the squirrels entering the roof of the property. They are currently 8.5m high and 4m wide and will remain 8.5m high and become 3m following the proposed works.
-
RU.26/0569 Granted
4 Simmons Place Staines-upon-thames Surrey TW18 3HW
T1 Lime - reduce canopy by 1m metres to previous secondary pruning points. Reason - to reduce excessive shading and for the health of the tree.
-
RU.26/0605 Granted
16 Barons Wood Tite Hill Englefield Green Surrey TW20 0ND
Oak: Crown Reduction - Reducing the height and spread of the tree by up to 1 metre. All arisings to be removed from site. Customer has requested maintenance work to the Oak tree in her garden to ensure it remains a suitable size for the space.
-
RU.26/0576 Granted
71 A Harpesford Avenue Virginia Water Surrey GU25 4RG
T1 - Oak at front - fell - tree has Acute Oak Decline (AOD) The tree is in advanced decline, almost dead, due AOD evidenced by weeping exudates on the main stem and progressive and advanced canopy dieback monitored over 5+ years. Structural integrity and vitality are now significantly compromised. Given its proximity to the dwelling and highway (high target occupancy), retention presents an unacceptable foreseeable risk of failure and liability under duty of care obligations. Felling is therefore justified on arboricultural safety grounds.