Skip to content
PlanIndex Get alerts
Menu

Planning application

18/01258/LAW

63 Windfall Way Gloucester GL2 0RP

Granted Gloucester Certificate of Lawfulness.

Proposal

Proposed single storey rear extension to form a Sun Lounge, roof drainage to discharge into existing storm drain.

As published by the council, reference 18/01258/LAW

Timeline

Dates from the published record

  1. 19 Oct 2018

    Received by Gloucester

  2. 20 Oct 2018

    Validated

    Checked as complete and ready for consideration.

  3. 20 Dec 2018

    Decision issued: Certificate of law Permited

  4. 2 Aug 2026

    Added to PlanIndex

What a grant of permission means

The process from here

Permission has been granted, usually subject to conditions listed on the decision notice, some of which must be discharged before work starts. The decision notice on the council portal sets out exactly what was approved.

Work must normally begin within three years of the decision or the permission lapses. Neighbours cannot appeal a grant; challenging one means judicial review of how the decision was made, within tight time limits.

About lawful development applications

How this application type works

A lawful development certificate is a legal determination, not a planning judgement. It asks the council to confirm either that existing use or works are lawful, often through the passage of time, or that a proposal would not need planning permission at all. The applicant must prove the facts; the merits of the scheme are not considered.

More on lawful development applications in our guide

Nearby applications

Within 500 metres

  • 25/00829/TPO Decided

    Green Pippin Close Gloucester

    See supporting information

    17 Sep 2025 45m away Trees
  • 26/00495/TPO Refused

    15 Green Pippin Close Gloucester GL2 0PA

    The tree in question for this application is the ash tree designated as T7 in TPO 105. However, in WildBirch Tree Consultancy - Tree Condition Report and Management Recommendations (WB-2026-020-R1), this same tree is identifed as T1. As concluded in WB-2026-020-R1, due to its size, proximity to adjacent structures, and the limited scale of the garden, the tree is considered unsuitable for long-term retention within the site. Consequently, the recommended works are to fell and potentially replace with a smaller more suitable species (section 5.14). It is recommended in section 5.15 that a smaller more suitable species (than ash) is planted that will not outgrow this site and that it is planted along the rear (south-western) boundary. Species suggestions are: ? Field maple ?Elsrijk? (Acer campestre ?Elsrijk?) ? Great white cherry (Prunus ?Tai Haku?) ? Whitebeam 'Lutescens' (Sorbus aria ?Lutescens?)

    8 Jun 2026 77m away Trees
  • 25/01174/TPO Refused

    15 Green Pippin Close Gloucester GL2 0PA

    Ash tree numbered T7 on the TPO 107, wrongly shown on TPO105. Given the tree isn't a good example of an ASH and the TPO was clearer placed on this tree and many others in the area in the past for the wrong reasons - to prevent planning and building of other houses there is no reason the tree can not be removed. We have a clear report from a specialist which we have shared with our house insurance company and they are insisting we apply for removal. The tree is 25m tall and is only 4 m from our property. If we fail to get a good reason if you decide removal isn't granted our insurance will become a problem. Please note if you still wish to "protect the area" we would be prepared to plant a different tree within our garden but far enough away so it couldn't fall on the house. We have examined carefully your guide on why a tree would have a TPO and can find no reason for such an order being required on a tree in this condition.

    31 Dec 2025 77m away Trees
  • 25/00999/TPO Refused

    15 Green Pippin Close Gloucester GL2 0PA

    Ash tree, T7 within TPO 107. The T7 designation is also used on the sketch plan to indicate the tree. The tree is located solely within our back garden. Work to be done to the tree is the felling of the tree, including stump grinding or similar. This is because the tree has Ash Dieback, is 25m tall, but less than 4m from the house and consequently possing a significant risk to the property. The tree has been seen by an Arborist and they have recommended its removal.

    13 Nov 2025 93m away Trees
  • 21/00721/FUL Granted

    6 Braeburn Close Gloucester GL2 0NS

    Single Storey Rear Extension

    10 Jun 2021 109m away Full applications
  • 26/00284/FUL Granted

    2A Elmbridge Road Gloucester GL2 0NZ

    Front, side and rear single storey extensions (to replace existing converted garage and side extension)

    26 Mar 2026 166m away Full applications

In Gloucester

  • 26/00447/LAW Granted

    19 Estcourt Close Gloucester GL1 3LP

    Single storey rear extension

    22 May 2026 Lawful development
  • 26/00546/LAW Granted

    20 Well Cross Road Gloucester GL4 6SN

    Single storey rear extension

    22 Jun 2026 Lawful development
  • 26/00645/LAW Status unknown

    21 Newark Road Gloucester GL1 5TW

    Single storey rear extension with pitched roof

    16 Jul 2026 Lawful development
  • 26/00434/LAW Refused

    17 Rosebery Avenue Gloucester GL1 5EQ

    Single storey rear and side extension

    18 May 2026 Lawful development
  • 26/00620/LAW Awaiting decision

    27 Osprey Close Gloucester GL4 4WJ

    Single storey extension to rear of property

    9 Jul 2026 Lawful development