Skip to content
PlanIndex Get alerts
Menu

Planning application

15 Green Pippin Close Gloucester GL2 0PA

Refused Gloucester 25/01174/TPO Tree Preservation Order

Works: Trees

Refused. Only the applicant can appeal, within the statutory time limit, and a revised scheme can be submitted instead.

Proposal

Ash tree numbered T7 on the TPO 107, wrongly shown on TPO105. Given the tree isn't a good example of an ASH and the TPO was clearer placed on this tree and many others in the area in the past for the wrong reasons - to prevent planning and building of other houses there is no reason the tree can not be removed. We have a clear report from a specialist which we have shared with our house insurance company and they are insisting we apply for removal. The tree is 25m tall and is only 4 m from our property. If we fail to get a good reason if you decide removal isn't granted our insurance will become a problem. Please note if you still wish to "protect the area" we would be prepared to plant a different tree within our garden but far enough away so it couldn't fall on the house. We have examined carefully your guide on why a tree would have a TPO and can find no reason for such an order being required on a tree in this condition.

As published by the council, reference 25/01174/TPO

Application record

Reference
25/01174/TPO
Type
Tree Preservation Order
Status
Awaiting decision
Decision
TPO Refuse
Received
31 Dec 2025
Validated
16 Jan 2026
Decided
10 Feb 2026
Ward
Elmbridge
Decision by
Delegated Decision
Postcode
GL2 0PA

Site history

Applications at this address on the Gloucester register

This site has had 4 applications since 2021: 0 approved, 3 refused.

  • 26/00495/TPO Refused

    15 Green Pippin Close Gloucester GL2 0PA

    The tree in question for this application is the ash tree designated as T7 in TPO 105. However, in WildBirch Tree Consultancy - Tree Condition Report and Management Recommendations (WB-2026-020-R1), this same tree is identifed as T1. As concluded in WB-2026-020-R1, due to its size, proximity to adjacent structures, and the limited scale of the garden, the tree is considered unsuitable for long-term retention within the site. Consequently, the recommended works are to fell and potentially replace with a smaller more suitable species (section 5.14). It is recommended in section 5.15 that a smaller more suitable species (than ash) is planted that will not outgrow this site and that it is planted along the rear (south-western) boundary. Species suggestions are: ? Field maple ?Elsrijk? (Acer campestre ?Elsrijk?) ? Great white cherry (Prunus ?Tai Haku?) ? Whitebeam 'Lutescens' (Sorbus aria ?Lutescens?)

    Decided 16 Jun 2026 Trees
  • 25/00999/TPO Refused

    15 Green Pippin Close Gloucester GL2 0PA

    Ash tree, T7 within TPO 107. The T7 designation is also used on the sketch plan to indicate the tree. The tree is located solely within our back garden. Work to be done to the tree is the felling of the tree, including stump grinding or similar. This is because the tree has Ash Dieback, is 25m tall, but less than 4m from the house and consequently possing a significant risk to the property. The tree has been seen by an Arborist and they have recommended its removal.

    Decided 25 Nov 2025 Trees
  • 21/00176/TPO Decided

    15 Green Pippin Close Gloucester GL2 0PA

    (T1) Ash (Fraxinus Excelsior) - Crown Reduction Works - Specification to include a height and spread reduction of 1.9m, cutting back to strong secondary growth. Shape and balance as indicated on image in red. Reason for Works: Routine tree maintenance to a mature tree with a history of reduction works.

    Decided 30 Apr 2021 Trees

Timeline

Dates from the published record

  1. 31 Dec 2025

    Received by Gloucester

  2. 16 Jan 2026

    Validated

    Checked as complete and ready for consideration.

  3. 10 Feb 2026

    Decision issued: TPO Refuse

  4. 27 Jul 2026

    Added to PlanIndex

Documents

Plans, drawings, consultee responses and the officer's report

3 documents on file for this application

A planning file usually holds the application form, drawings and site plans, consultee responses, the officer's report and the decision notice.

Trade members open them from here.

Open the documents

What this refusal means

Gloucester refused this application for the reasons on the decision notice; only the applicant can appeal, and refused schemes often return in revised form. More in our guide to what happens after a planning decision.

About tree works applications

Applications for works to trees cover protected trees: consent under a tree preservation order, or six weeks notice for trees in a conservation area. More in our guide to planning application types.

Nearby applications

Within 500 metres

  • 15 Green Pippin Close Gloucester GL2 0PA

    26/00495/TPO Submitted 8 Jun 2026 1m away

    The tree in question for this application is the ash tree designated as T7 in TPO 105. However, in WildBirch Tree Consultancy - Tree Condition Report and Management Recommendations (WB-2026-020-R1), this same tree is identifed as T1. As concluded in WB-2026-020-R1, due to its size, proximity to adjacent structures, and the limited scale of the garden, the tree is considered unsuitable for long-term retention within the site. Consequently, the recommended works are to fell and potentially replace with a smaller more suitable species (section 5.14). It is recommended in section 5.15 that a smaller more suitable species (than ash) is planted that will not outgrow this site and that it is planted along the rear (south-western) boundary. Species suggestions are: ? Field maple ?Elsrijk? (Acer campestre ?Elsrijk?) ? Great white cherry (Prunus ?Tai Haku?) ? Whitebeam 'Lutescens' (Sorbus aria ?Lutescens?)

    Refused Trees
  • 15 Green Pippin Close Gloucester GL2 0PA

    25/00999/TPO Submitted 13 Nov 2025 29m away

    Ash tree, T7 within TPO 107. The T7 designation is also used on the sketch plan to indicate the tree. The tree is located solely within our back garden. Work to be done to the tree is the felling of the tree, including stump grinding or similar. This is because the tree has Ash Dieback, is 25m tall, but less than 4m from the house and consequently possing a significant risk to the property. The tree has been seen by an Arborist and they have recommended its removal.

    Refused Trees 3 docs
  • 15 Green Pippin Close Gloucester GL2 0PA

    21/00176/TPO Submitted 12 Feb 2021 29m away

    (T1) Ash (Fraxinus Excelsior) - Crown Reduction Works - Specification to include a height and spread reduction of 1.9m, cutting back to strong secondary growth. Shape and balance as indicated on image in red. Reason for Works: Routine tree maintenance to a mature tree with a history of reduction works.

    Decided Trees 3 docs
  • Green Pippin Close Gloucester

    25/00829/TPO Submitted 17 Sep 2025 63m away

    See supporting information

    Decided Trees 3 docs
  • 63 Windfall Way Gloucester GL2 0RP

    18/01258/LAW Submitted 19 Oct 2018 77m away

    Proposed single storey rear extension to form a Sun Lounge, roof drainage to discharge into existing storm drain.

    Granted Lawful development Extension 8 docs
    Small domestic
  • 8 Elmbridge Road Gloucester GL2 0NZ

    23/01025/FUL Submitted 20 Dec 2023 94m away

    Ground floor rear extension

    Granted Full applications Extension 11 docs

In Gloucester

  • 26/00739/TPO Refused

    7 Wigmore Close Gloucester GL4 5FF

    It's an indian bean tree located the front of the house. It is a very big tree and is causing damage to the driveway and the lamp post located near is possibly being effected by the roots and it isn't straight and is wobbly. It also overhangs next doors driveway. I would like to apply to get the tree taken down for safety reasons and damage to driveway also potential damage by roots to the house in the future.

    17 Aug 2026 Trees
  • 26/00744/TPO Decided

    29 Kingsmead Gloucester GL4 5DY

    Oak tree covered by an area TPO. A reduction is required to preserve the surrounding properties due to the tree encroaching on boundary gardens. The roots of the tree are already disturbing foundations and causing heave. Suggested reduction of 30%. The impacted tree does not appear to be labelled (or this cannot be identified from documents seen), aerial view of the tree provided. The tree sits within the boundary of 29 Kingsmead, encroaching the neighbouring properties, 47 & 48 Kennett Gardens.

    17 Aug 2026 Trees
  • 26/00697/TPO Decided

    Redlands Acre 35 Tewkesbury Road Gloucester GL2 9BD

    T1 Cedar tree, remove damaged limbs, deadwood and reduce canopy by 2-3 m to reduce end weight and mitigate limb failure risk

    3 Aug 2026 Trees
  • 26/00652/TPO Decided

    36 Prices Ground Gloucester GL4 4PD

    Description of Trees Hawthorn (Crataegus species) ? rear garden about 8 metres tall Elder (Sambucus nigra) ? rear garden about 8 metres tall ________________________________________ Proposed Works Hawthorn Trees Undertake a crown reduction by approximately 2-3 metres in height and 1-2 metres in lateral spread, maintaining a balanced crown and the natural shape and character of the trees. Remove any dead, damaged, crossing or defective branches as part of the works. Elder Trees Undertake a height reduction of approximately 2-3 metres and prune selected branches to reduce spread and maintain the trees at an appropriate size for the garden environment. Remove any dead, damaged or defective branches and retain the natural form of the trees. All works to be undertaken to current arboricultural best practice. ________________________________________ Reasons for the Works The trees have grown substantially in height and spread and are now creating excessive shading within the rear garden and affecting general garden enjoyment and maintenance. The proposed works are intended to: ? Maintain the trees at an appropriate size for a residential garden. ? Improve light penetration to the garden. ? Reduce future management requirements. ? Retain the trees as attractive landscape features. ? Promote their long-term health through sympathetic maintenance and pruning. No trees are proposed for removal. ________________________________________ Additional Supporting Statement Prior to submitting this notification, advice was sought from Gloucester City Council. Following informal discussions with the Council's Tree Officer, it was recommended that a formal application/notification be submitted regarding the Hawthorn trees. For completeness and to avoid any uncertainty regarding tree protection status, the Elder trees have also been included within this submission.

    17 Jul 2026 Trees
  • 26/00635/TPO Decided

    41 Cherston Court Gloucester GL4 3LE

    T!: Tulip Tree - Back of the property. ? Reduce crown by 1-2m ? End weight elongated limbs (Reduce by 2-3m) ? Remove all major deadwood

    14 Jul 2026 Trees