Skip to content
PlanIndex Get alerts
Menu

Planning application

Haven Orchard Exwick Lane Exeter Devon EX4 2AP

Refused Exeter 23/0131/MDO Modify / Discharge Planning Obligations

Refused. Only the applicant can appeal, within the statutory time limit, and a revised scheme can be submitted instead.

Proposal

Discharge of S106 Planning obligations relating to 05/0587/FUL

As published by the council, reference 23/0131/MDO

Application record

Reference
23/0131/MDO
Type
Modify / Discharge Planning Obligations
Status
Refused
Decision
Refused As published: Refuse Planning Permission
Received
19 Jan 2023
Validated
19 Jan 2023
Decided
31 May 2024
Ward
Exwick
Decision by
Delegated Decision
Postcode
EX4 2AP

Timeline

Dates from the published record

  1. 19 Jan 2023

    Received by Exeter

  2. 31 May 2024

    Decision issued: Refuse Planning Permission

  3. 6 Oct 2026

    Added to PlanIndex

Who's behind it

Company information only, from the register and Companies House

Pichler Planning consultancy Ltd Agent, a planning consultancy registered in Exeter

Active · incorporated 2012 · Exeter

27 applications on PlanIndex · across 5 councils · 70% granted

Trade members see everything this firm has filed, how it was decided, and get an email the day it files again.

See their track record

Documents

Plans, drawings, consultee responses and the officer's report

3 documents on file for this application

A planning file usually holds the application form, drawings and site plans, consultee responses, the officer's report and the decision notice.

Watch members (£5 a month) open the document list from here.

Open the documents

What this refusal means

Exeter refused this application for the reasons on the decision notice; only the applicant can appeal, and refused schemes often return in revised form. More in our guide to what happens after a planning decision.

About condition discharge and variation applications

This application deals with conditions on an existing permission, supplying the details a condition requires or asking to vary or remove one, without reopening the permission itself. More in our guide to planning application types.

Nearby applications

Within 0.3 miles

  • 4 Cheltenham Close Exeter EX4 2EL

    26/1421/TPO Submitted 22 Sep 2026 50 yards away

    97% historically approved · decision due ~17 Nov

    T1 Common Ash/Fraxinus Excelsior. Removal of two secondary limbs on south aspect, cut diameter 200mm. Reduce remaining crown by 2 meters. Cut size not exceeding 80mm. The property owners would like this work carried to reduce the likelihood of branch failures and to promote stability.

    Awaiting decision Trees 3 docs
  • Northmore House Cleve Lane Exeter EX4 2AR

    25/1495/TPO Submitted 23 Oct 2025 50 yards away

    T1 - Monterey Pine - Thin the density of the lowest primary lateral branch (which directly overhangs the front garden of the adjacent property) by 30%. This will consist of third order growth only, natural target pruning, and dead wood. Diameter cuts made will be restricted to 2 inch diameter. Reasons - Residents have been worried about this branch for many years. Re-assurance has been provided, and weight removed in the past. The proposed work is designed to reduce the 'sail effect' of the canopy, without adversely affecting the vigour and health of the limb/tree. T2 - Dying Yes tree - Reduce to approximately 6 metres high, or the bowl of the main stem. Reasons - The tree is dying, with very little living growth left. The work is essentially a pollard, and a last chance effort to invigorate the tree into producing foliage. Although pollarding does not always work, this tree will not survive, and start dropping the dead lateral branches. Reducing the size of a crown can concentrate a trees resources into producing new foliage, and so this remedial work is recommended. T3 - Holm Oak - Reduce one stem overhanging the rear gardens of Canterbury Rd by 4 metres. Cut size of approx. 27cm. The stem in question comes into contact (lower down) with the previously reduced stem overhanging the gardens. Reasons - The stem originates from a groups of stems forming the crown of the tree. The tree was coppiced earlier in its life, hence the multi stemmed re-growth. This re-growth is inherently weak, and there are significant lateral forces exerted, especially in high winds, making it likely for stems to fail at the original union. Currently the stem in question moves to a greater degree (observed in moderate winds) when compared with the rest of the crown. Therefore this work is recommended. Recommendations/evidence is provided by Hywel Davies, Consultant for Exe Tree Care Ltd

    Granted Trees 4 docs
  • Northmore House Cleve Lane Exeter EX4 2AR

    23/1342/TPO Submitted 2 Nov 2023 50 yards away

    T1 - Sycamore - Fell Reasons - major cracking at the base of the tree, which appears to start below ground level, and continues vertically up the main stem, finishing between two main stems. The union between these two stems is weak, and the crack is evidence that failure of one or both stems is a high possibility. - Photos attached identify the crack. T2 - Beech - Fell Reasons - Beech bark disease was identified in a previous application to fell this tree. The disease has progressed to a stage where little cambium remains at the the base of the tree. The complete girdling of the tree due to lack of bark/cambium is possible in the next season or so. The crown has now died back fairly extensively due to the disease. I recommend felling because I feel the tree can now not survive and a risk of the failure of limbs or the entire tree over the road is a high possibility. - Photos identify the lack of bark at the base of the tree.

    Granted Trees 6 docs
  • 2 Cheltenham Close Exeter EX4 2EL

    23/1036/TPO Submitted 17 Aug 2023 100 yards away

    Oak Tree Hanging over 1 Cheltenham Close.

    Split decision Trees 4 docs
  • 12 Cheltenham Close Exeter Devon EX4 2EL

    23/0386/TPO Submitted 19 Mar 2023 100 yards away

    We have one tree located at the top of our garden which is very large and blocks out most of the sunlight throughout the day. It also causes a lot of debris and blockages of our guttering throughout autumn / winter months from leaves. The tree looks very untidy where some branches could be trimmed to provide more daylight into our garden and less debris. Some branches are also hanging which could be a risk if the break and fall into our garden.

    Granted Trees 5 docs
  • 11 Cheltenham Close Exeter EX4 2EL

    26/0563/TPO Submitted 19 Apr 2026 150 yards away

    Remove dead branches throughout the crown where they present a clear risk of falling into the garden, sheds or boundary fence. Remove broken or hanging branches at risk of detachment, limited to secondary and tertiary branches only, maximum cut diameter 80 mm. Crown lift to provide 2 m clearance above garden level by removing selected small secondary and tertiary branches only, maximum cut diameter 50 mm. Reduce lateral branches on the east aspect by up to 2-3 m, targeting secondary and tertiary branches, maximum cut diameter 80 mm, to trim back the periphery of the crown.

    Granted Trees 12 docs
    Small domestic

In Exeter

  • 26/1442/DIS Awaiting decision

    Yonk Asian Foods Summerland Street Exeter EX1 2AT

    Discharge condition 16 (Materials) of planning permission 23/0490/FUL - Demolition of existing buildings and the construction of a 145 bed-space co-living development (up to 6 storeys in height) and associated works (Revised Plans).

    Received 25 Sep, published by the council 6 Oct 2026 Conditions
  • 26/1110/DIS Split decision

    1 Higher Riverdale Exe Street Topsham EX3 0JL

    Discharge of Conditions 3, 4, 5, 7 and 9 of Planning Permission Ref. 25/1413/FUL, granted 11 February 2026, relating to construction management, drainage, materials, landscaping and biodiversity enhancements

    Received 24 Jul, published by the council 16 Aug 2026 Conditions
  • 26/1439/DIS Awaiting decision

    54 Longbrook Street Exeter EX4 6AH

    Discharge of Condition 3 on Planning Permission Ref. 26/0025/FUL and Listed Building Consent Ref. 26/0026/LBC, granted on 15 June 2026, relating to archaeological recording

    Received 24 Sep, published by the council 6 Oct 2026 Conditions
  • 26/1376/DIS Granted

    14 Park Lane Exeter EX4 9HL

    Discharge of Condition 4 of Planning Permission Ref. 25/1816/FUL, granted on 05 March 2026, relating to drainage

    Received 13 Sep, published by the council 17 Sep 2026 Conditions
  • 26/1414/DIS Awaiting decision

    Apsham Grange Land On The West Side Of Clyst Road Topsham Exeter

    Part discharge condition 14 (SAP Compliance Reports for Plots 1, 2, 3, 4 and 6) of planning permission 21/0894/OUT (appeal ref APP/Y1110/W/22/3296946) - Outline planning application for the construction of up to 100 dwellings and associated infrastructure (Means of access to be determined with scale, layout, appearance and landscaping reserved for future consideration).

    Received 21 Sep, published by the council 30 Sep 2026 Conditions