Planning application
Garden Cottage 35 Riverside Wraysbury Staines TW19 5JQ
Refused. Only the applicant can appeal, within the statutory time limit, and a revised scheme can be submitted instead.
Proposal
Certificate of lawfulness to determine whether the existing use of the outbuilding (Garden Cottage) as residential dwelling is lawful.
As published by the council, reference 23/01729/CLU
Application record
- Reference
- 23/01729/CLU
- Type
- Certificate of Lawful Use
- Status
- Decided
- Decision
- Refused As published: Refuse
- Received
- 14 Jul 2023
- Validated
- 14 Jul 2023
- Decided
- 8 Sep 2023
- Ward
- Datchet Horton And Wraysbury
- Parish
- Wraysbury Parish
- Decision by
- Delegated
- Postcode
- TW19 5JQ
Timeline
Dates from the published record
-
14 Jul 2023
Received by Windsor and Maidenhead
-
8 Sep 2023
Decision issued: Refuse
-
12 Sep 2026
Added to PlanIndex
Documents
Plans, drawings, consultee responses and the officer's report
13 documents on file for this application
A planning file usually holds the application form, drawings and site plans, consultee responses, the officer's report and the decision notice.
Watch members (£5 a month) open the document list from here.
Open the documentsWhat this refusal means
Windsor and Maidenhead refused this application for the reasons on the decision notice; only the applicant can appeal, and refused schemes often return in revised form. More in our guide to what happens after a planning decision.
About lawful development applications
A lawful development certificate is a legal determination that existing or proposed works do not need planning permission; the merits of the scheme are not considered. More in our guide to planning application types.
Nearby applications
Within 0.3 miles
-
42 Wharf Road Wraysbury Staines TW19 5JQ
New outbuilding to form a two bedroom annex ancillary to the main dwellinghouse.
Refused Full applications 19 docsSmall domestic -
Willow Tree Cottage 40 Friary Road Wraysbury Staines TW19 5JP
Installation of an automated sliding gate, support piers and fencing.
Refused Full applications 11 docs -
Jour-De-Fete Riverside Wraysbury Staines TW19 5JN
Single storey side extension, two storey rear extension and creation of first floor incorporating second floor mezzanine, steps and decking, detached sunroom, timber decking, railings and 3no. mooring platforms
Withdrawn Full applications Extension 18 docsSmall domestic -
38 Wharf Road Wraysbury Staines TW19 5JQ
69% historically approved · decision due ~26 Nov
Certificate of lawfulness to determine whether the proposed part garage conversion and single storey side/front extension is lawful.
Awaiting decision Lawful development Extension 5 docsSmall domestic -
Friary House 6 Friary Island Friary Road Wraysbury Staines TW19 5JR
Replacement four bedroom dwelling with detached garage, associated landscaping and realignment of the existing creek (Retrospective).
Granted Full applications 47 docsDomestic -
Friary House 6 Friary Island Friary Road Wraysbury Staines TW19 5JR
Replacement fencing.
Refused Full applications 11 docs
Other lawful development applications
In Windsor and Maidenhead
-
26/02222/CPD Refused
52 Audley Way Ascot SL5 8EF
Certificate of lawfulness to determine whether the proposed single storey rear extension following the removal of the existing conservatory is lawful.
-
26/01954/CPD Withdrawn
Mulberry House Waltham Road Maidenhead SL6 3NH
Certificate of lawfulness to determine whether the single storey rear extension is lawful.
-
26/01856/CLU Granted
Apple Tree Cottage And Land Adjacent To Apple Tree Cottage Paley Street Maidenhead
Certificate of lawfulness to determine whether the existing use of the land as a residential garden incidental to the main dwelling is lawful
-
26/02022/CPD Refused
14 Church View White Waltham Maidenhead SL6 3JQ
Certificate of lawfulness to determine whether the proposed 1no. rear dormer and alterations to fenestration are lawful
-
26/01862/CLU Granted
Holyport Pre School Holyport Youth Club Moneyrow Green Holyport Maidenhead SL6 2NA
Certificate of lawfulness to determine whether the existing use of the site as a pre-school is lawful.