Skip to content
PlanIndex Get alerts
Menu

Planning application

Glebelands Woodman Lane Sparsholt Winchester Hampshire SO21 2NS

Granted Winchester 26/01536/TPC

Permission granted. Work must normally begin within three years of the decision or the permission lapses.

Proposal

T1 - Yew - Reduce Northern canopy overhang towards Glebelands by up to 2m and also Western side by a similar amount to nearest good growth point and balance shape.

As published by the council, reference 26/01536/TPC

Application record

Reference
26/01536/TPC
Status
Decided
Decision
Granted As published: That no objection be raised
Received
27 Jul 2026
Validated
5 Aug 2026
Decided
4 Sep 2026
Ward
WONSTON AND MICHELDEVER WARD
Parish
Sparsholt
Postcode
SO21 2NS

Timeline

Dates from the published record

  1. 27 Jul 2026

    Received by Winchester

  2. 5 Aug 2026

    Validated

    Checked as complete and ready for consideration.

  3. 8 Aug 2026

    Added to PlanIndex

  4. 19 Aug 2026

    Status changed to Awaiting decision

    Previously Current.

  5. 4 Sep 2026

    Decision issued: That no objection be raised

  6. 10 Sep 2026

    Status changed to Decided

    Previously Awaiting decision.

Documents

Plans, drawings, consultee responses and the officer's report

2 documents on file for this application

  • APPLICATION FORM - WITHOUT PERSONAL DATA Application Form · 27 Jul 2026
  • SKETCH PLAN Drawing · 27 Jul 2026

Watch members (£5 a month) open the document list from here.

Open the documents

What this grant of permission means

Winchester granted permission on 4 September 2026, subject to any conditions on the decision notice. Work must normally begin within three years or the permission lapses. More in our guide to what happens after a planning decision.

About this record

The published feed does not state which type of application this is; the register entry on Winchester's portal will say. Our guide explains the common types.

Nearby applications

Within 0.3 miles

  • Opposite The Church Woodman Lane Sparsholt Winchester Hampshire SO21 2NS

    26/01293/TPC Submitted 22 Jun 2026 50 yards away

    96% historically approved · decision due ~17 Aug

    T1 Remove dead Cherry tree T2 Conifer - Cut back over hanging branches by 1.5m to clear garden

    Decided Trees 3 docs
  • Long Cottage Woodman Lane Sparsholt SO21 2NS

    21/00321/TPC Submitted 8 Feb 2021 50 yards away

    T1 - Horse Chestnut - Reduce height by 2-3m and spread by 1.5-2m G1 - 4 Beech - Reduce height by 2-3m and spread by 1.5-2m

    Granted Trees 3 docs
  • Rose Cottage Woodman Lane Sparsholt Winchester Hampshire SO21 2NS

    26/00569/TPC Submitted 17 Mar 2026 50 yards away

    99% historically approved · decision due ~12 May

    Yew tree at south end of garden adjoining Woodman Lane Crown reduction of two metres to the east side overhanging Woodman Lane. Note - permission lasted granted in 2015 reference W01874/11TPOCA. Section overhanging road needs to be removed to allow clearance for larger vehicles, particularly those servicing the Moorcourt Farm. Crown lift to one metre above ground level on remaining sides of tree to allow maintenance of balance. Work identical to that approved in 2015

    Decided Trees 2 docs
  • The Haven Woodman Lane Sparsholt Winchester Hampshire SO21 2NS

    25/01831/TPC Submitted 8 Sep 2025 50 yards away

    (amended) T1 - Sycamore - Fell.

    Granted Trees 3 docs
  • Rudgwick Woodman Lane Sparsholt Winchester Hampshire SO21 2NS

    26/00946/TPO Submitted 6 May 2026 50 yards away

    T1 - Yew - Reduce lower canopy over garage/shed to give 1.5m clearance from the building.

    Granted Trees 3 docs
    Small domestic
  • The Forge Woodman Lane Sparsholt SO21 2NS

    21/01697/TPC Submitted 21 Jun 2021 50 yards away

    PART 1 Species: Leylandii We would like to remove the branches from a row of 16 Leylandii that overhang the boundary between our property and our neighbours ('Opposite the Church', Woodman Lane). The trees were planted a number of years ago (presumably as a hedge) and have been unmaintained over the years leaving them in a straggly and untidy condition. When we moved to our property we were advised by a Winchester City Council tree inspector who visited the site that, due to their nature, we should treat the row as a hedge and we would not need planning permission to prune them back (REF: 16/02593/TPC). If we prune them back a little we will soon get back to wood that will not produce new growth and will leave unsightly branches without foliage. Therefore we propose to prune them back close to the trucks, which are on the boundary itself. This will allow new vegetation to grow up underneath and will give us the option to plant more suitable trees and plants our side of the boundary. We are currently unable to fully utilise this area of our garden due to the overhanging branches and we would prefer to be able to encourage the growth of new vegetation in this area which is impossible at the moment. The pruned areas will only be visible to us, no other neighbours will be affected and we are willing to live with the bare trunks until other vegetation and trees can be planted. There are already three holly trees that are struggling to grow due to the lack of light from the overhanging branches in the specified area that we would like to encourage if possible. Furthermore, the branches that overhang our property create a very dark and damp environment where moss and algae grow. This side of our property includes a run of steps, giving access from the front of our house to the back garden, and they are often slippery and unsafe due to debris from the trees and the lack of light and air circulation PART 2 Species: Horse Chestnut We would like to reduce the size of the...

    Granted Trees 5 docs