Glebelands Woodman Lane Sparsholt Winchester Hampshire SO21 2NS

1. 27 Jul 2026

   Received by Winchester

2. 5 Aug 2026

   Validated

   Checked as complete and ready for consideration.

3. 8 Aug 2026

   Added to PlanIndex

4. 19 Aug 2026

   Status changed to Awaiting decision

   Previously Current.

5. Decision

   Awaiting decision

   Decision expected by 30 September 2026, 8 weeks from validation under the statutory target for most applications. Extensions of time are common and are agreed case by case.

   Winchester took a median of 58 days over the applications it decided in the last year.

This application is with Winchester for determination. The council publicises it, consults neighbours and technical bodies where required, and weighs the responses against local and national planning policy.

The statutory target is eight weeks for most applications and thirteen for major development, though extensions of time are common. Comments carry most weight while the case is undecided, so check the council portal for the deadline if you want to respond.

This page mirrors an entry on the statutory planning register that Winchester is required to keep. The published feed for this record does not state which type of application it is, which is common for older entries and for some council systems; the register entry on the council portal will say, alongside the case officer and any consultation dates.

Every planning application follows the same broad path: submission, validation, publicity, then a decision by officers or committee. Our guide to planning application types explains the common types and what each can approve.

• Opposite The Church Woodman Lane Sparsholt Winchester Hampshire SO21 2NS

  26/01293/TPC Submitted 22 Jun 2026 0m away

  96% historically approved · decision due ~17 Aug

  T1 Remove dead Cherry tree T2 Conifer - Cut back over hanging branches by 1.5m to clear garden

  Decided Trees

• Long Cottage Woodman Lane Sparsholt SO21 2NS

  21/00321/TPC Submitted 8 Feb 2021 1m away

  T1 - Horse Chestnut - Reduce height by 2-3m and spread by 1.5-2m G1 - 4 Beech - Reduce height by 2-3m and spread by 1.5-2m

  Granted Trees 3 docs

• Rose Cottage Woodman Lane Sparsholt Winchester Hampshire SO21 2NS

  26/00569/TPC Submitted 17 Mar 2026 1m away

  99% historically approved · decision due ~12 May

  Yew tree at south end of garden adjoining Woodman Lane Crown reduction of two metres to the east side overhanging Woodman Lane. Note - permission lasted granted in 2015 reference W01874/11TPOCA. Section overhanging road needs to be removed to allow clearance for larger vehicles, particularly those servicing the Moorcourt Farm. Crown lift to one metre above ground level on remaining sides of tree to allow maintenance of balance. Work identical to that approved in 2015

  Awaiting decision Trees 1 doc

• The Haven Woodman Lane Sparsholt Winchester Hampshire SO21 2NS

  25/01831/TPC Submitted 8 Sep 2025 10m away

  (amended) T1 - Sycamore - Fell.

  Granted Trees 4 docs

• Rudgwick Woodman Lane Sparsholt Winchester Hampshire SO21 2NS

  26/00946/TPO Submitted 6 May 2026 46m away

  T1 - Yew - Reduce lower canopy over garage/shed to give 1.5m clearance from the building.

  Granted Trees 5 docs
  Small domestic

• The Forge Woodman Lane Sparsholt SO21 2NS

  21/01697/TPC Submitted 21 Jun 2021 48m away

  PART 1 Species: Leylandii We would like to remove the branches from a row of 16 Leylandii that overhang the boundary between our property and our neighbours ('Opposite the Church', Woodman Lane). The trees were planted a number of years ago (presumably as a hedge) and have been unmaintained over the years leaving them in a straggly and untidy condition. When we moved to our property we were advised by a Winchester City Council tree inspector who visited the site that, due to their nature, we should treat the row as a hedge and we would not need planning permission to prune them back (REF: 16/02593/TPC). If we prune them back a little we will soon get back to wood that will not produce new growth and will leave unsightly branches without foliage. Therefore we propose to prune them back close to the trucks, which are on the boundary itself. This will allow new vegetation to grow up underneath and will give us the option to plant more suitable trees and plants our side of the boundary. We are currently unable to fully utilise this area of our garden due to the overhanging branches and we would prefer to be able to encourage the growth of new vegetation in this area which is impossible at the moment. The pruned areas will only be visible to us, no other neighbours will be affected and we are willing to live with the bare trunks until other vegetation and trees can be planted. There are already three holly trees that are struggling to grow due to the lack of light from the overhanging branches in the specified area that we would like to encourage if possible. Furthermore, the branches that overhang our property create a very dark and damp environment where moss and algae grow. This side of our property includes a run of steps, giving access from the front of our house to the back garden, and they are often slippery and unsafe due to debris from the trees and the lack of light and air circulation PART 2 Species: Horse Chestnut We would like to reduce the size of the...

  Granted Trees 5 docs