Planning application
The Haven Woodman Lane Sparsholt Winchester Hampshire SO21 2NS
Works: Trees
Permission granted. Work must normally begin within three years of the decision or the permission lapses.
Proposal
(amended) T1 - Sycamore - Fell.
As published by the council, reference 25/01831/TPC
Application record
- Reference
- 25/01831/TPC
- Type
- Tree In A Conservation Area
- Status
- Decided
- Decision
- That no objection be raised
- Received
- 8 Sep 2025
- Validated
- 9 Sep 2025
- Decided
- 12 Nov 2025
- Ward
- WONSTON AND MICHELDEVER WARD
- Parish
- Sparsholt
- Decision by
- Delegated Decision
- Postcode
- SO21 2NS
Timeline
Dates from the published record
-
8 Sep 2025
Received by Winchester
-
9 Sep 2025
Validated
Checked as complete and ready for consideration.
-
12 Nov 2025
Decision issued: That no objection be raised
-
12 Aug 2026
Added to PlanIndex
Who's behind it
Company information only, from the register and Companies House
Agent on file, a tree-works contractor registered in Eastleigh
31 applications on PlanIndex · 92% granted
Trade members see who it is, their full track record, and every application they have filed.
See who's behind itDocuments
Plans, drawings, consultee responses and the officer's report
4 documents on file for this application
A planning file usually holds the application form, drawings and site plans, consultee responses, the officer's report and the decision notice.
Trade members open them from here.
Open the documentsWhat a grant of permission means
The process from here
Permission has been granted, usually subject to conditions listed on the decision notice, some of which must be discharged before work starts. The decision notice on the council portal sets out exactly what was approved.
Work must normally begin within three years of the decision or the permission lapses. Neighbours cannot appeal a grant; challenging one means judicial review of how the decision was made, within tight time limits.
About trees applications
How this application type works
Tree applications cover work to protected trees: those under a tree preservation order need consent for pruning or felling, and trees in a conservation area need six weeks written notice before work starts. The council assesses the amenity value of the tree and can refuse consent, approve it with conditions, or in conservation areas make a preservation order in response.
Nearby applications
Within 500 metres
-
Long Cottage Woodman Lane Sparsholt SO21 2NS
T1 - Horse Chestnut - Reduce height by 2-3m and spread by 1.5-2m G1 - 4 Beech - Reduce height by 2-3m and spread by 1.5-2m
Granted Trees 3 docs -
Rose Cottage Woodman Lane Sparsholt Winchester Hampshire SO21 2NS
99% historically approved · decision due ~12 May
Yew tree at south end of garden adjoining Woodman Lane Crown reduction of two metres to the east side overhanging Woodman Lane. Note - permission lasted granted in 2015 reference W01874/11TPOCA. Section overhanging road needs to be removed to allow clearance for larger vehicles, particularly those servicing the Moorcourt Farm. Crown lift to one metre above ground level on remaining sides of tree to allow maintenance of balance. Work identical to that approved in 2015
Awaiting decision Trees 1 doc -
Opposite The Church Woodman Lane Sparsholt Winchester Hampshire SO21 2NS
96% historically approved · decision due ~17 Aug
T1 Remove dead Cherry tree T2 Conifer - Cut back over hanging branches by 1.5m to clear garden
Decided Trees -
Glebelands Woodman Lane Sparsholt Winchester Hampshire SO21 2NS
96% historically approved · decision due ~30 Sep
T1 - Yew - Reduce Northern canopy overhang towards Glebelands by up to 2m and also Western side by a similar amount to nearest good growth point and balance shape.
Awaiting decision 2 docs -
Rudgwick Woodman Lane Sparsholt Winchester Hampshire SO21 2NS
T1 - Yew - Reduce lower canopy over garage/shed to give 1.5m clearance from the building.
Granted Trees 5 docsSmall domestic -
The Forge Woodman Lane Sparsholt SO21 2NS
PART 1 Species: Leylandii We would like to remove the branches from a row of 16 Leylandii that overhang the boundary between our property and our neighbours ('Opposite the Church', Woodman Lane). The trees were planted a number of years ago (presumably as a hedge) and have been unmaintained over the years leaving them in a straggly and untidy condition. When we moved to our property we were advised by a Winchester City Council tree inspector who visited the site that, due to their nature, we should treat the row as a hedge and we would not need planning permission to prune them back (REF: 16/02593/TPC). If we prune them back a little we will soon get back to wood that will not produce new growth and will leave unsightly branches without foliage. Therefore we propose to prune them back close to the trucks, which are on the boundary itself. This will allow new vegetation to grow up underneath and will give us the option to plant more suitable trees and plants our side of the boundary. We are currently unable to fully utilise this area of our garden due to the overhanging branches and we would prefer to be able to encourage the growth of new vegetation in this area which is impossible at the moment. The pruned areas will only be visible to us, no other neighbours will be affected and we are willing to live with the bare trunks until other vegetation and trees can be planted. There are already three holly trees that are struggling to grow due to the lack of light from the overhanging branches in the specified area that we would like to encourage if possible. Furthermore, the branches that overhang our property create a very dark and damp environment where moss and algae grow. This side of our property includes a run of steps, giving access from the front of our house to the back garden, and they are often slippery and unsafe due to debris from the trees and the lack of light and air circulation PART 2 Species: Horse Chestnut We would like to reduce the size of the...
Granted Trees 5 docs
Other trees applications
In Winchester
-
26/01820/TPO Awaiting decision
10 Walnut Grove Winchester Hampshire SO22 5HR
Complete removal of the Horse chestnut tree as close to ground level as possible. This work should be completed as a priority given the presence of targets within felling distance. During felling i...
-
26/01797/TPO Awaiting decision
11 Austen Close Winchester Hampshire SO23 7HS
Our house is in a TPO polygon. There are two small trees in our garden to the left and right of our garden. The tree on the right side has grown and damaged/ crushed the fence. The trees themselves...
-
26/01799/TPO Awaiting decision
72 Parchment Street Winchester Hampshire SO23 8AT
T1 Horse Chestnut - Fell, the tree dominates the rear garden and surrounding properties. Damage is being caused to the retaining walls by the constricted roots. (see report)
-
26/01786/TPO Awaiting decision
5 Woodpeckers Drive Winchester Hampshire SO22 5JJ
Trees 1 - 4. Reduce in height to leave an overall finished height of 17m. Crown lift to 5.3m to alleviate shading. Justification in attached report.
-
26/01769/TPO Awaiting decision
1 Regent Court Northlands Drive Winchester Hampshire SO23 7AH
submitted as 26/01744/TPC. G1 - Remove any trees growing within 1m of wall long Worthy Road. Crown lift to 5.2m over highway and cut back from lamp post to provide to provide statutory clearance.