Skip to content
PlanIndex Get alerts
Menu

Planning application

The Forge Woodman Lane Sparsholt Winchester Hampshire SO21 2NS

Granted Winchester 21/02151/TPC Tree In A Conservation Area

Works: Trees

Relates to 21/01697/TPC

Permission granted. Work must normally begin within three years of the decision or the permission lapses.

Proposal

I also talked to you about cutting down the ash tree in the centre of three at the back of our house and which is inhibiting the grown of the other two. We had planning permission to do this previously and would like to get the work done at the same time as the conifers are being cropped back if possible. (previous application 21/01697/TPC)

As published by the council, reference 21/02151/TPC

Application record

Reference
21/02151/TPC
Type
Tree In A Conservation Area
Status
Decided
Decision
That no objection be raised
Received
11 Aug 2021
Validated
11 Aug 2021
Decided
17 Aug 2021
Ward
WONSTON AND MICHELDEVER WARD
Parish
Sparsholt
Decision by
Delegated Decision
Postcode
SO21 2NS

Timeline

Dates from the published record

  1. 11 Aug 2021

    Received by Winchester

  2. 17 Aug 2021

    Decision issued: That no objection be raised

  3. 28 Jul 2026

    Added to PlanIndex

Cases linked to this one on the register

  • 21/01697/TPC Granted

    The Forge Woodman Lane Sparsholt SO21 2NS

    PART 1 Species: Leylandii We would like to remove the branches from a row of 16 Leylandii that overhang the boundary between our property and our neighbours ('Opposite the Church', Woodman Lane). The trees were planted a number of years ago (presumably as a hedge) and have been unmaintained over the years leaving them in a straggly and untidy condition. When we moved to our property we were advised by a Winchester City Council tree inspector who visited the site that, due to their nature, we should treat the row as a hedge and we would not need planning permission to prune them back (REF: 16/02593/TPC). If we prune them back a little we will soon get back to wood that will not produce new growth and will leave unsightly branches without foliage. Therefore we propose to prune them back close to the trucks, which are on the boundary itself. This will allow new vegetation to grow up underneath and will give us the option to plant more suitable trees and plants our side of the boundary. We are currently unable to fully utilise this area of our garden due to the overhanging branches and we would prefer to be able to encourage the growth of new vegetation in this area which is impossible at the moment. The pruned areas will only be visible to us, no other neighbours will be affected and we are willing to live with the bare trunks until other vegetation and trees can be planted. There are already three holly trees that are struggling to grow due to the lack of light from the overhanging branches in the specified area that we would like to encourage if possible. Furthermore, the branches that overhang our property create a very dark and damp environment where moss and algae grow. This side of our property includes a run of steps, giving access from the front of our house to the back garden, and they are often slippery and unsafe due to debris from the trees and the lack of light and air circulation PART 2 Species: Horse Chestnut We would like to reduce the size of the...

    Decided 7 Aug 2021 Trees

Documents

Plans, drawings, consultee responses and the officer's report

1 document on file for this application

A planning file usually holds the application form, drawings and site plans, consultee responses, the officer's report and the decision notice.

Trade members open them from here.

Open the documents

What this grant of permission means

Winchester granted permission on 17 August 2021, subject to any conditions on the decision notice. Work must normally begin within three years or the permission lapses. More in our guide to what happens after a planning decision.

About tree works applications

Applications for works to trees cover protected trees: consent under a tree preservation order, or six weeks notice for trees in a conservation area. More in our guide to planning application types.

Nearby applications

Within 500 metres

  • The Forge Woodman Lane Sparsholt SO21 2NS

    21/01697/TPC Submitted 21 Jun 2021 7m away

    PART 1 Species: Leylandii We would like to remove the branches from a row of 16 Leylandii that overhang the boundary between our property and our neighbours ('Opposite the Church', Woodman Lane). The trees were planted a number of years ago (presumably as a hedge) and have been unmaintained over the years leaving them in a straggly and untidy condition. When we moved to our property we were advised by a Winchester City Council tree inspector who visited the site that, due to their nature, we should treat the row as a hedge and we would not need planning permission to prune them back (REF: 16/02593/TPC). If we prune them back a little we will soon get back to wood that will not produce new growth and will leave unsightly branches without foliage. Therefore we propose to prune them back close to the trucks, which are on the boundary itself. This will allow new vegetation to grow up underneath and will give us the option to plant more suitable trees and plants our side of the boundary. We are currently unable to fully utilise this area of our garden due to the overhanging branches and we would prefer to be able to encourage the growth of new vegetation in this area which is impossible at the moment. The pruned areas will only be visible to us, no other neighbours will be affected and we are willing to live with the bare trunks until other vegetation and trees can be planted. There are already three holly trees that are struggling to grow due to the lack of light from the overhanging branches in the specified area that we would like to encourage if possible. Furthermore, the branches that overhang our property create a very dark and damp environment where moss and algae grow. This side of our property includes a run of steps, giving access from the front of our house to the back garden, and they are often slippery and unsafe due to debris from the trees and the lack of light and air circulation PART 2 Species: Horse Chestnut We would like to reduce the size of the...

    Granted Trees 5 docs
  • Opposite The Church Woodman Lane Sparsholt Winchester Hampshire SO21 2NS

    26/01293/TPC Submitted 22 Jun 2026 50m away

    96% historically approved · decision due ~17 Aug

    T1 Remove dead Cherry tree T2 Conifer - Cut back over hanging branches by 1.5m to clear garden

    Decided Trees 3 docs
  • Glebelands Woodman Lane Sparsholt Winchester Hampshire SO21 2NS

    26/01536/TPC Submitted 27 Jul 2026 50m away

    T1 - Yew - Reduce Northern canopy overhang towards Glebelands by up to 2m and also Western side by a similar amount to nearest good growth point and balance shape.

    Granted 2 docs
  • Long Cottage Woodman Lane Sparsholt SO21 2NS

    21/00321/TPC Submitted 8 Feb 2021 50m away

    T1 - Horse Chestnut - Reduce height by 2-3m and spread by 1.5-2m G1 - 4 Beech - Reduce height by 2-3m and spread by 1.5-2m

    Granted Trees 3 docs
  • Rose Cottage Woodman Lane Sparsholt Winchester Hampshire SO21 2NS

    26/00569/TPC Submitted 17 Mar 2026 50m away

    99% historically approved · decision due ~12 May

    Yew tree at south end of garden adjoining Woodman Lane Crown reduction of two metres to the east side overhanging Woodman Lane. Note - permission lasted granted in 2015 reference W01874/11TPOCA. Section overhanging road needs to be removed to allow clearance for larger vehicles, particularly those servicing the Moorcourt Farm. Crown lift to one metre above ground level on remaining sides of tree to allow maintenance of balance. Work identical to that approved in 2015

    Decided Trees 2 docs
  • Opposite The Church Woodman Lane Sparsholt SO21 2NS

    21/02875/TPC Submitted 8 Nov 2021 58m away

    T1 Thuja - Reduce height by 1-2m & trim back side growth to reshape T2 Field Maple - Young developing tree - formative prune to improve shape & long term prospects G1 Group of fruit trees - Formative prune

    Granted Trees 3 docs

In Winchester

  • 26/01933/TPO Awaiting decision

    Squirrels Botley Road Curdridge Southampton Hampshire SO32 2DS

    Works toTPO Oak tree Ref TPO/1749 to raise crown to 5.4m above public highway and private driveway .Remove dead wood over 50mm diameter and rebalance / reshape .

    17 Sep 2026 Trees
  • 26/01929/TPO Awaiting decision

    Edwinsfield Oakmore Park Durley Southampton Hampshire SO32 2NU

    Please see plan. We propose to reduce the oak tree by 2m on its east side.

    16 Sep 2026 Trees
  • 26/01930/TPO Awaiting decision

    4 Appulby Gardens Winchester Hampshire SO22 6HW

    T1- Hornbeam: Carry out a localised reduction of the western side of the canopy by up to 3 metres from the branch tips, pruning back to suitable growth points while maintaining the natural form and...

    16 Sep 2026 Trees
  • 26/01915/TPO Awaiting decision

    Upincott Peach Hill Lane Crawley Winchester Hampshire SO21 2PU

    T3 - Yew - Deadwood and reduce limb overhanging boundary to south eastern aspect. T4 - Western Red Cedar - Removal of limb on south western aspect overhanging boundary fence.

    15 Sep 2026 Trees
  • 26/01912/TPO Awaiting decision

    3 Arundel Close Alresford Hampshire SO24 9PJ

    Please see attached map of trees T1 - T6. Please note T7 (silver birch, no TPO) was cut down 10 years ago. T1 - minimal work, just trim lower branch overhangs and remove dead wood. T2 - crown lift...

    15 Sep 2026 Trees