7 Acacia Road NW8 6AB

1. 31 Oct 2025

   Received by Westminster

2. 18 Dec 2025

   Decision issued: No objections

3. 21 Jul 2026

   Added to PlanIndex

Westminster granted permission on 18 December 2025, subject to any conditions on the decision notice. Work must normally begin within three years or the permission lapses. More in our guide to what happens after a planning decision.

Applications for works to trees cover protected trees: consent under a tree preservation order, or six weeks notice for trees in a conservation area. More in our guide to planning application types.

• 9 Acacia Road NW8 6AB

  26/00464/TCA Submitted 27 Jan 2026 50 yards away

  1 x lime (rear): crown reduce to previous, most recent reduction points. 1 x silver birch (rear): crown reduce by about 1.5m; to previous, most recent reduction points, retaining shortened growth for furnishing. Crown thin by 20%

  Granted Trees 14 docs

• 3 Acacia Road NW8 6AB

  25/07741/TCA Submitted 27 Oct 2025 50 yards away

  1 x Horse chestnut (front): reduce crown by around 1.5 metres on all aspects of the crown 1 x group of several privet trees (rear): reduce by around 2 metres in height and 0.5 metres laterally.

  Granted Trees 7 docs

• Ordnance Arms 29 - 29A Ordnance Hill London NW8 6PS

  25/04648/TCA Submitted 7 Jul 2025 50 yards away

  T1 - Sycamore. Tip back / reduce the crown on its northeast aspect over the PH garden to the established reduction points, examples of which are identified in the supporting photographs. The work is required to reduce detritus accumulating in the garden and to shorten perching spots, thereby reducing the accumulation of pigeon faeces on the patio and garden furniture. Given it's only proposed to tip back to the established pruning points on the crown's northeast aspect, it's considered the works will have a negligible impact on the tree's longevity. T2 - False Acacia. Fell. This specimen is located in proximity to the boundary wall and one of its codominant stems is starting to encase the adjacent buttress. There is evidence of an included union on the stem?s southwest aspect that is compromising its structural integrity. Dense epicormic growth is also present throughout its entire crown, which is generally associated with a stress response. Given the defects present, it is not considered a suitable specimen to become the subject of a TPO. The defects are shown in the supporting photographs.

  Decided Trees 5 docs
  Small domestic

• 52 Acacia Road NW8 6AL

  25/08575/ADFULL Submitted 24 Nov 2025 50 yards away

  Details of tree protection plan pursuant to condition 10 of planning permission dated 12 December 2023 (RN: 22/05383/FULL)

  Granted Full applications Trees 2 docs

• 52 Acacia Road London NW8 6AL

  26/03689/ADFULL Submitted 5 Jun 2026 50 yards away

  88% historically approved · decision due ~31 Jul

  Details of soil crafting system and permeable vehicular hard surfacing, landscape general arrangement plan and details of specification and profile of the soil above the basement pursuant to conditions 9, 11, 12 of planning permission dated 12 December 2023 (RN: 22/05383/FULL).

  Awaiting decision Full applications 5 docs

• 52 Acacia Road NW8 6AL

  25/06535/ADFULL Submitted 12 Sep 2025 50 yards away

  Details of existing and proposed drawings of the site boundary wall and piers including foundations, demonstrating how these can be constructed in a way that will not cause any harm to trees and in particular tree roots pursuant to condition 10 of planning permission dated 12th December 2023 (RN:22/05383/FULL)

  Refused Full applications Trees 17 docs
  Small domestic

• 26/07520/TPO Awaiting decision

  Lords Cricket Ground St John's Wood Road London NW8 8QZ

  2 lime trees located to the west of the Allen Stand and north of Lords Tavern, by the Grace Gate entrance from St John's Wood Road. These trees are noted as T7 and T8 on attached plans and reports. Roots belonging to both trees were severed during excavations for service trenches associated with construction of the Allen Stand on site. Static load tests were carried out to both trees in April 2026, which flagged T7 as having an insufficient safety factor. T7 was therefore recommended for a 3m reduction in height to reduce the risk of failure. Due to T7 and T8 forming a continuous canopy, T8 has also been recommended for the same specification of reduction to prevent exposing its crown to excessive wind loading.

  Received 4 Nov, published by the council 6 Nov 2026 Trees
• 26/07523/TCA Awaiting decision

  Lancaster House Stable Yard Road London SW1A 1BB

  T5 - False Acacia Reduce Crown in Height (by 3m) and Shape (Specify final height and width) Reduce in height by 3m. Tag 1052 T11 Holm Oak Dismantle to ground level Tag 4049

  Received 4 Nov, published by the council 6 Nov 2026 Trees
• 26/07469/TPO Awaiting decision

  48 Craven Hill Gardens London W2 3EA

  T1 London plane: crown reduce back to previous, most recent reduction points (approx. 3-4m).

  Received 3 Nov, published by the council 6 Nov 2026 Trees
• 26/07483/TCA Awaiting decision

  144 Hamilton Terrace London NW8 9UX

  T1: Cherry: To thin by 15% T2: Group Purple Plums: 30% Thin and 1.5m reduction leaving a balanced crown shape. T3: Lime: Pollard to previous reduction points leaving some shortened furnishing growth T4: Japanese Maple: To thin crown density by 30% All works being carried out as general maintenance

  Received 3 Nov, published by the council 6 Nov 2026 Trees
• 26/07484/TCA Awaiting decision

  208 Randolph Avenue London W9 1PF

  T3 ? Sycamore (Acer pseudoplatanus), located in the rear garden of 208 Randolph Avenue, London W9 1PF. Proposed works: Fell T3 Sycamore to ground level and remove the resulting timber and arisings. The tree has been classified as Category U in the Arboricultural Implications Assessment (Report J69.34, dated 12 October 2026) prepared by Broad Oak Tree Consultants. The assessment identifies significant basal decay, a basal cavity, structural deterioration and crown dieback. The report recommends pollarding at approximately 8 metres or felling. Full removal is proposed due to the tree's poor structural condition and associated safety concerns.

  Received 3 Nov, published by the council 6 Nov 2026 Trees