Planning application
Sextons Cottage Church Lane Speen Newbury RG14 1SA
Still open. Anyone can comment while the consultation period runs, and comments go to the council rather than to us.
Proposal
T1 ASH - Fell due to ash die back
As published by the council, reference 26/01937/TPW
Application record
- Reference
- 26/01937/TPW
- Status
- Awaiting decision
- Received
- 4 Sep 2026
- Validated
- 4 Sep 2026
- Postcode
- RG14 1SA
Timeline
Dates from the published record
-
4 Sep 2026
Received by West Berkshire
-
4 Sep 2026
Added to PlanIndex
-
Decision
Awaiting decision
Decision expected by 30 October 2026, 8 weeks from validation under the statutory target for most applications. Extensions of time are common and are agreed case by case.
West Berkshire took a median of 58 days over the applications it decided in the last year.
What happens while it is decided
The process from here
This application is with West Berkshire for determination. The council publicises it, consults neighbours and technical bodies where required, and weighs the responses against local and national planning policy.
The statutory target is eight weeks for most applications and thirteen for major development, though extensions of time are common. Comments carry most weight while the case is undecided, so check the council portal for the deadline if you want to respond.
About this record
Reading the register
This page mirrors an entry on the statutory planning register that West Berkshire is required to keep. The published feed for this record does not state which type of application it is, which is common for older entries and for some council systems; the register entry on the council portal will say, alongside the case officer and any consultation dates.
Every planning application follows the same broad path: submission, validation, publicity, then a decision by officers or committee. Our guide to planning application types explains the common types and what each can approve.
Nearby applications
Within 500 metres
-
Sextons Cottage Church Lane Speen Newbury RG14 1SA
Installing Marsh Ensign 6 person sewage treatment plant, connecting, commissioning and associated works. All to be compliant with the General Binding Rules 2020. Breaking out and filling old non compliant tank.
Granted Householder 19 docsDomestic -
Sextons Cottage Church Lane Speen Newbury RG14 1SA
Sycamore: 35% root decay. Remove.
Granted Trees 2 docs -
Sextons Cottage Church Lane Speen Newbury RG14 1SA
We need to remove a small hawthorn tree, which is part of a hawthorn hedge, in order to provide access for small plant equipment from the road onto our property to replace our non-compliant septic tank with a sewage treatment plant ahead of selling the property. We will also need to remove a small section of the hawthorn hedge, but that will be replaced once the work is completed. The diameter of the tree stem is 67 cm. We are hoping to start the work early June 2026.
Granted Trees 3 docs -
Churchways Speen Lane Speen Newbury Berkshire RG14 1RL
Single storey rear and side extension to existing dwelling
Granted Householder Extension 2 docsSmall domestic -
11 Majendie Close Speen Newbury RG14 1QH
Outline Planning Permission for the subdivision of the substantial garden associated with an existing two bedroom end of terrace dwelling, to create a new residential plot. The proposal allows for the future development of a new three to four bedroom dwelling, with provision for on site access, parking and private amenity space. The existing dwelling will be retained, with the garden appropriately reconfigured. All detailed matters relating to design, scale, layout and appearance are reserved for future consideration. Resubmission of application 25/01440/OUT.
Granted Outline 31 docsDomestic -
Yew Tree House Speen Lane Speen Newbury RG14 1RJ
96% historically approved · decision due ~28 Oct
T1 - T6: Yew Trees: Removal of trees located within five metres of the external walls of the property. The trees have grown too large for their location, being planted close together and within 5 m of the house and garage. They significantly reduce light into the property and garden, while branches quite often break off and fall, creating a safety concern. Their proximity also raises potential risk of subsidence, and their size makes ongoing maintenance impractical. To mitigate their removal, I propose to replant more suitable species, such as Amelanchier, Rowan, Crab Apple, Tibetan Cherry, and possibly Silver Birch, in positions further from the property to preserve the character of the conservation area.
Awaiting decision Trees 4 docs