Skip to content
PlanIndex Get alerts
Menu

Planning application

38 Oak Tree Close Virginia Water Surrey GU25 4JG

At appeal Runnymede RU.26/0712 Trees

Works: Trees

At appeal, which passes the decision to the national inspectorate. Anyone who commented before is normally able to comment again.

Proposal

High Hedge Complaint

As published by the council, reference RU.26/0712

Application record

Reference
RU.26/0712
Type
Trees
Status
At appeal As published: APPEAL LODGED
Received
1 Jun 2026
Validated
1 Jun 2026
Postcode
GU25 4JG

Timeline

Dates from the published record

  1. 1 Jun 2026

    Received by Runnymede

  2. 30 Jul 2026

    Added to PlanIndex

  3. 8 Oct 2026

    Status changed to APPEAL LODGED

    Previously REGISTERED.

  4. Decision

    Awaiting decision

    Decision expected by 27 July 2026, 8 weeks from validation under the statutory target for most applications. Extensions of time are common and are agreed case by case.

    Runnymede took a median of 47 days over the applications it decided in the last year.

Documents

Plans, drawings, consultee responses and the officer's report

4 documents on file for this application

A planning file usually holds the application form, drawings and site plans, consultee responses, the officer's report and the decision notice.

Watch members (£5 a month) open the document list from here.

Open the documents

What happens at appeal

This application is at appeal, which passes the decision from Runnymede to the planning inspectorate, and the outcome will replace the council's decision. More in our guide to what happens after a planning decision.

About tree works applications

Applications for works to trees cover protected trees: consent under a tree preservation order, or six weeks notice for trees in a conservation area. More in our guide to planning application types.

Nearby applications

Within 0.3 miles

  • 41 Oak Tree Close Virginia Water GU25 4JG

    RU.19/1508 Submitted 22 Oct 2019 50 yards away

    Details Pursuant to Discharge of Condition 5 (Construction Transport Management Plan) and Condition 6 (Tree Protection Plan) of Planning Approval RU.19/0588

    Granted Trees 7 docs
  • 14 Oak Tree Close Virginia Water Surrey GU25 4JF

    RU.26/1020 100 yards away

    81% historically approved

    Details pursuant to Discharge Condition 5 (Contaminated Land (Installation)) of planning permission RU.25/1059 for an: Additional storey to existing bungalow, to include a two storey front extension and a single storey rear extension following partial demolition of existing elements

    Awaiting decision Extension Demolition
    Small domestic
  • 23 Oak Tree Close Virginia Water Surrey GU25 4JF

    RU.26/0888 100 yards away

    Prior Approval for a single storey rear extension with a depth of 6 metres beyond the rear wall of the original dwelling house with a maximum height of 4 metres and eaves height of 2.75 metres

    Granted Extension
    Small domestic
  • 22 Oak Tree Close Virginia Water Surrey GU25 4JF

    RU.25/1154 Submitted 3 Sep 2025 100 yards away

    Single storey ground floor rear extension

    Granted Extension 7 docs
    Small domestic
  • 2 Oak Tree Close Virginia Water Surrey GU25 4JF

    RU.23/1367 Submitted 12 Oct 2023 100 yards away

    Works to TPO tree- Beech tree crown reduction to suggested height by Council

    Withdrawn Trees 3 docs
  • 21 Oak Tree Close Virginia Water GU25 4JF

    RU.19/1458 Submitted 15 Oct 2019 100 yards away

    Lawful development certificate for a proposed side dormer

    Granted Outline Loft or dormer 13 docs

In Runnymede

  • RU.26/0594 Refused

    49 Woodham Park Road Addlestone Surrey KT15 3SP

    T1- English Oak (Quercus robur), located in the rear of the property in a Westerly direction. The client proposes a reduction of 3m as part of the trees ongoing management and ensuring it doesn't outgrow its position. The tree is currently 19m high and 25m wide, and will be approximately 16m high and 22m wide following the proposed works.

    Received 14 May, published by the council 30 Jul 2026 Trees
  • RU.26/0595 Decided

    53 Woodham Park Road Addlestone Surrey KT15 3TN

    T1- Silver Birch located in the rear of the property in a Southerly direction. The client proposes a reduction of 3m as part of the trees ongoing management to ensure it doesn't outgrow its position. It is currently 14m high and 4m wide and will be approximately 11m high and 2m wide following the proposed works. T2- Sycamore, 3 Birch & 4 Oak are a cluster of trees loaded at the rear boundary again in a southerly direction. They overhang 49 Woodham Park Roads building and the client would like them cut back by 1m to reduce the squirrels entering the roof of the property. They are currently 8.5m high and 4m wide and will remain 8.5m high and become 3m following the proposed works.

    Received 14 May, published by the council 30 Jul 2026 Trees
  • RU.26/0569 Granted

    4 Simmons Place Staines-upon-thames Surrey TW18 3HW

    T1 Lime - reduce canopy by 1m metres to previous secondary pruning points. Reason - to reduce excessive shading and for the health of the tree.

    Received 14 May, published by the council 30 Jul 2026 Trees
  • RU.26/0605 Granted

    16 Barons Wood Tite Hill Englefield Green Surrey TW20 0ND

    Oak: Crown Reduction - Reducing the height and spread of the tree by up to 1 metre. All arisings to be removed from site. Customer has requested maintenance work to the Oak tree in her garden to ensure it remains a suitable size for the space.

    Received 13 May, published by the council 30 Jul 2026 Trees
  • RU.26/0576 Granted

    71 A Harpesford Avenue Virginia Water Surrey GU25 4RG

    T1 - Oak at front - fell - tree has Acute Oak Decline (AOD) The tree is in advanced decline, almost dead, due AOD evidenced by weeping exudates on the main stem and progressive and advanced canopy dieback monitored over 5+ years. Structural integrity and vitality are now significantly compromised. Given its proximity to the dwelling and highway (high target occupancy), retention presents an unacceptable foreseeable risk of failure and liability under duty of care obligations. Felling is therefore justified on arboricultural safety grounds.

    Received 8 May, published by the council 30 Jul 2026 Trees