Planning application
Ecnamor Wey Meadows Addlestone Surrey KT13 8XY
Works: Trees Domestic
Read from the description, not a valuation. How we read the register
Part of this application was approved and part refused. The decision notice on the council portal sets out which is which.
Proposal
Details pursuant to discharge Conditions 11 (Tree Protection), 12 (Landscaping), 14 (Side Screen), 15 (Water Efficiency) and 16 (Renewable Energy/Low Carbon Energy) of application RU.24/1458 for the: Erection of replacement dwelling and decking following demolition of existing dwelling and decking.
As published by the council, reference RU.26/0514
Application record
- Reference
- RU.26/0514
- Type
- Trees
- Status
- Part approved, part refused As published: FINAL DECISION
- Decision
- Part approved, part refused As published: Split decisions for Discharge of conditions
- Received
- 22 Apr 2026
- Validated
- 22 Apr 2026
- Decided
- 10 Jun 2026
- Postcode
- KT13 8XY
Site history
Applications at this address on the Runnymede register
This site has had 4 applications since 2024: 3 approved, 0 refused.
-
RU.24/1458 Granted
Ecnamor Wey Meadows Addlestone Surrey KT13 8XY
Erection of replacement dwelling and decking following demolition of existing dwelling and decking.
-
RU.26/0951 Granted
Ecnamor Wey Meadows Addlestone Surrey KT13 8XY
Details pursuant to discharge Condition 14 (Side Screen) and 15 (Water Efficiency) of application RU.24/1458 (Erection of replacement dwelling and decking following demolition of existing dwelling and decking).
-
RU.26/0844 Granted
Ecnamor Wey Meadows Addlestone Surrey KT13 8XY
Non-Material Amendment to planning permission RU.24/1458 for minor design revisions, including revised front and rear eaves with a small overhang, removal of windows on the SW and NE elevations, minor internal layout changes, addition of entrance canopies, and timber cladding to the principal entrance.
Timeline
Dates from the published record
-
22 Apr 2026
Received by Runnymede
-
10 Jun 2026
Decision issued: Split decisions for Discharge of conditions
-
11 Aug 2026
Added to PlanIndex
Documents
Plans, drawings, consultee responses and the officer's report
16 documents on file for this application
A planning file usually holds the application form, drawings and site plans, consultee responses, the officer's report and the decision notice.
Watch members (£5 a month) open the document list from here.
Open the documentsAfter the decision
Runnymede has decided this application; the outcome above is the register's own wording and the decision notice on the council portal carries the detail. More in our guide to what happens after a planning decision.
About tree works applications
Applications for works to trees cover protected trees: consent under a tree preservation order, or six weeks notice for trees in a conservation area. More in our guide to planning application types.
Nearby applications
Within 0.3 miles
-
20 Wey Meadows Addlestone Surrey KT13 8XY
Certificate of Proposed Lawful Development for a caravan.
Granted Outline 14 docs -
Ecnamor Wey Meadows Addlestone Surrey KT13 8XY
Erection of replacement dwelling and decking following demolition of existing dwelling and decking.
Granted Other Demolition 27 docsDomestic -
Plot 20 Wey Meadows Addlestone KT13 8XY
Application seeking a Proposed Lawful Development Certificate for the adaptation of the existing structure to create a caravan in two sections to be retained on the site.
Refused Amendments 17 docs -
50 Wey Meadows Addlestone Surrey KT13 8XY
Raise floor levels of ground floor, single storey rear extension and alterations to fenestration.
Granted Extension Windows or glazing 26 docsSmall domestic -
62 Wey Meadows Addlestone KT13 8XY
The construction of an eco-friendly single storey log holiday home to replace the previous original home that burnt down in 1995.
Refused 19 docsSmall domestic -
Ecnamor Wey Meadows Addlestone Surrey KT13 8XY
Details pursuant to discharge Condition 14 (Side Screen) and 15 (Water Efficiency) of application RU.24/1458 (Erection of replacement dwelling and decking following demolition of existing dwelling and decking).
Granted DemolitionDomestic
Other tree works applications
In Runnymede
-
RU.26/0594 Refused
49 Woodham Park Road Addlestone Surrey KT15 3SP
T1- English Oak (Quercus robur), located in the rear of the property in a Westerly direction. The client proposes a reduction of 3m as part of the trees ongoing management and ensuring it doesn't outgrow its position. The tree is currently 19m high and 25m wide, and will be approximately 16m high and 22m wide following the proposed works.
-
RU.26/0595 Decided
53 Woodham Park Road Addlestone Surrey KT15 3TN
T1- Silver Birch located in the rear of the property in a Southerly direction. The client proposes a reduction of 3m as part of the trees ongoing management to ensure it doesn't outgrow its position. It is currently 14m high and 4m wide and will be approximately 11m high and 2m wide following the proposed works. T2- Sycamore, 3 Birch & 4 Oak are a cluster of trees loaded at the rear boundary again in a southerly direction. They overhang 49 Woodham Park Roads building and the client would like them cut back by 1m to reduce the squirrels entering the roof of the property. They are currently 8.5m high and 4m wide and will remain 8.5m high and become 3m following the proposed works.
-
RU.26/0569 Granted
4 Simmons Place Staines-upon-thames Surrey TW18 3HW
T1 Lime - reduce canopy by 1m metres to previous secondary pruning points. Reason - to reduce excessive shading and for the health of the tree.
-
RU.26/0605 Granted
16 Barons Wood Tite Hill Englefield Green Surrey TW20 0ND
Oak: Crown Reduction - Reducing the height and spread of the tree by up to 1 metre. All arisings to be removed from site. Customer has requested maintenance work to the Oak tree in her garden to ensure it remains a suitable size for the space.
-
RU.26/0576 Granted
71 A Harpesford Avenue Virginia Water Surrey GU25 4RG
T1 - Oak at front - fell - tree has Acute Oak Decline (AOD) The tree is in advanced decline, almost dead, due AOD evidenced by weeping exudates on the main stem and progressive and advanced canopy dieback monitored over 5+ years. Structural integrity and vitality are now significantly compromised. Given its proximity to the dwelling and highway (high target occupancy), retention presents an unacceptable foreseeable risk of failure and liability under duty of care obligations. Felling is therefore justified on arboricultural safety grounds.