Planning application
8 Lodge Close Englefield Green Surrey TW20 0JF
Works: Trees
Refused. Only the applicant can appeal, within the statutory time limit, and a revised scheme can be submitted instead.
Proposal
T1 - Birch - fell and stump grind - tree in very poor condition and will be replaced with another Birch
As published by the council, reference RU.26/0409
Application record
- Reference
- RU.26/0409
- Type
- Trees
- Status
- Refused As published: FINAL DECISION
- Decision
- Refused As published: Tree - Refuse works to tree covered by TPO
- Received
- 2 Apr 2026
- Validated
- 2 Apr 2026
- Decided
- 18 May 2026
- Postcode
- TW20 0JF
Site history
Applications at this address on the Runnymede register
This site has had 4 applications since 2023: 1 approved, 1 refused.
-
RU.26/0476 Decided
8 Lodge Close Englefield Green Surrey TW20 0JF
T1 - remove epicormic growth on the main stem from ground level to a height of 5 metres and remove dead wood T2 - remove dead wood and reduce limbs overhanging the garden of number 8 Lodge Close by 2 metres.
-
RU.23/0192 Granted
8 Lodge Close Englefield Green Surrey TW20 0JF
T1 - Silver Birch at rear. Reduce canopy by 2m to give clearance to neighbour's property.
-
RU.26/0981 Awaiting decision
8 Lodge Close Englefield Green Surrey TW20 0JF
T1 - Birch - fell and stump grind - tree in very poor condition: A large basal cavity extending well into the buttress/root flare. Advanced decay with soft, crumbly wood, likely white rot. Strong callus growth around the wound, showing the tree has been trying to compartmentalise the defect for a while. Epicormic shoots emerging from the base, which can be a stress response. As such the tree is now a likely risk for basal failure. Tree will be replaced with another Birch
Timeline
Dates from the published record
-
2 Apr 2026
Received by Runnymede
-
18 May 2026
Decision issued: Tree - Refuse works to tree covered by TPO
-
11 Aug 2026
Added to PlanIndex
Documents
Plans, drawings, consultee responses and the officer's report
5 documents on file for this application
A planning file usually holds the application form, drawings and site plans, consultee responses, the officer's report and the decision notice.
Watch members (£5 a month) open the document list from here.
Open the documentsWhat this refusal means
Runnymede refused this application for the reasons on the decision notice; only the applicant can appeal, and refused schemes often return in revised form. More in our guide to what happens after a planning decision.
About tree works applications
Applications for works to trees cover protected trees: consent under a tree preservation order, or six weeks notice for trees in a conservation area. More in our guide to planning application types.
Nearby applications
Within 0.3 miles
-
8 Lodge Close Englefield Green Egham Surrey TW20 0JF
Single storey rear extension to infill between house and garage
Granted Extension 5 docsSmall domestic -
8 Lodge Close Englefield Green Surrey TW20 0JF
T1 - remove epicormic growth on the main stem from ground level to a height of 5 metres and remove dead wood T2 - remove dead wood and reduce limbs overhanging the garden of number 8 Lodge Close by 2 metres.
Decided 7 docs -
8 Lodge Close Englefield Green Egham Surrey TW20 0JF
T1 Oak - Reduce lateral spread to the south by 2m, to leave a spread of 8m. T2 Oak - Reduce height by 1m and spread by 1.5m to leave a height of 8m and spread of 5m
Granted 4 docs -
8 Lodge Close Englefield Green TW20 0JF
Two storey side and rear extension.
Granted Extension 11 docs -
9 Lodge Close Englefield Green Surrey TW20 0JF
Erection of front porch, ground floor rear extension, side infill with roof to provide walkway between garage and partial conversion of the existing garage including raising of roof to provide habitable accommodation and ancillary storage.
Granted Extension 17 docsSmall domestic -
12 Lodge Close Englefield Green Surrey TW20 0JF
T2 Horse Chestnut - Fell. T1 London Plane, T3 English Oak - Lift crown to give 6m clearance above ground level and reduce lateral limbs extending over rear garden by 2-3m.
At appeal Other 9 docs
Other tree works applications
In Runnymede
-
RU.26/0594 Refused
49 Woodham Park Road Addlestone Surrey KT15 3SP
T1- English Oak (Quercus robur), located in the rear of the property in a Westerly direction. The client proposes a reduction of 3m as part of the trees ongoing management and ensuring it doesn't outgrow its position. The tree is currently 19m high and 25m wide, and will be approximately 16m high and 22m wide following the proposed works.
-
RU.26/0595 Decided
53 Woodham Park Road Addlestone Surrey KT15 3TN
T1- Silver Birch located in the rear of the property in a Southerly direction. The client proposes a reduction of 3m as part of the trees ongoing management to ensure it doesn't outgrow its position. It is currently 14m high and 4m wide and will be approximately 11m high and 2m wide following the proposed works. T2- Sycamore, 3 Birch & 4 Oak are a cluster of trees loaded at the rear boundary again in a southerly direction. They overhang 49 Woodham Park Roads building and the client would like them cut back by 1m to reduce the squirrels entering the roof of the property. They are currently 8.5m high and 4m wide and will remain 8.5m high and become 3m following the proposed works.
-
RU.26/0569 Granted
4 Simmons Place Staines-upon-thames Surrey TW18 3HW
T1 Lime - reduce canopy by 1m metres to previous secondary pruning points. Reason - to reduce excessive shading and for the health of the tree.
-
RU.26/0605 Granted
16 Barons Wood Tite Hill Englefield Green Surrey TW20 0ND
Oak: Crown Reduction - Reducing the height and spread of the tree by up to 1 metre. All arisings to be removed from site. Customer has requested maintenance work to the Oak tree in her garden to ensure it remains a suitable size for the space.
-
RU.26/0576 Granted
71 A Harpesford Avenue Virginia Water Surrey GU25 4RG
T1 - Oak at front - fell - tree has Acute Oak Decline (AOD) The tree is in advanced decline, almost dead, due AOD evidenced by weeping exudates on the main stem and progressive and advanced canopy dieback monitored over 5+ years. Structural integrity and vitality are now significantly compromised. Given its proximity to the dwelling and highway (high target occupancy), retention presents an unacceptable foreseeable risk of failure and liability under duty of care obligations. Felling is therefore justified on arboricultural safety grounds.