Vincent House Christchurch Road Virginia Water Surrey GU25 4PJ

This site has had 2 applications since 2026.

• RU.26/0637 Split decision

  Vincent House Christchurch Road Virginia Water Surrey GU25 4PJ

  Details pursuant to Discharge Condition 5 (SuDS), 10 (Tree Protection) and 11 (H&S Landscaping) of planning permission RU.21/1792 (Proposed replacement dwelling and replacement driveway gates following demolition of existing dwelling and outbuilding).

1. 4 Mar 2026

   Received by Runnymede

2. 8 Apr 2026

   Decision issued: Split decisions for Discharge of conditions

3. 11 Aug 2026

   Added to PlanIndex

Runnymede has decided this application; the outcome above is the register's own wording and the decision notice on the council portal carries the detail. More in our guide to what happens after a planning decision.

Applications for works to trees cover protected trees: consent under a tree preservation order, or six weeks notice for trees in a conservation area. More in our guide to planning application types.

• Stonington Christchurch Road Surrey GU25 4PJ

  RU.26/0586 Submitted 29 May 2026 50 yards away

  Removal/variation of Condition 2 and 5 of planning permission RU.19/1389 Erection of a two storey detached dwelling with accommodation in the roof space including dormer windows in the front and rear elevations and attached double garage with ancillary accommodation over following the demolition of the existing dwelling. (renewal of approved application RU.16/1530).

  Granted Conditions New dwelling Loft or dormer +2 23 docs
  Domestic

• Land between 32 & 36 Abbots Drive Virginia Water GU25 4PJ

  RU.21/0858 Submitted 9 Jun 2021 50 yards away

  Details pursuant to conditions 3 (materials), 5 (SuDS) , 6 (Landscaping) and 10 (Biodiversity) of Planning permission RU.20/1752

  Granted Conditions 11 docs

• Stonington Christchurch Road Virginia Water Surrey GU25 4PJ

  RU.26/0410 Submitted 2 Apr 2026 50 yards away

  Details pursuant to Discharge Condition 5 (Surface Water Drainage) of planning permission RU.19/1389 for the Erection of a two storey detached dwelling with accommodation in the roof space including dormer windows in the front and rear elevations and attached double garage with ancillary accommodation over following the demolition of the existing dwelling.

  Granted Conditions New dwelling Loft or dormer +2 3 docs
  Domestic

• Stonington Christchurch Road Virginia Water Surrey GU25 4PJ

  RU.26/0022 Submitted 19 Jan 2026 50 yards away

  Details pursuant to Discharge Condition 5 (surface water drainage) of planning permission RU.19/1389 (Erection of a two storey detached dwelling with accommodation in the roof space including dormers windows in front and rear elevations and attached double garage with ancillary accommodation.)

  Refused Conditions New dwelling Loft or dormer +1 6 docs
  Domestic

• Vincent House Christchurch Road Virginia Water Surrey GU25 4PJ

  RU.26/0637 50 yards away

  Details pursuant to Discharge Condition 5 (SuDS), 10 (Tree Protection) and 11 (H&S Landscaping) of planning permission RU.21/1792 (Proposed replacement dwelling and replacement driveway gates following demolition of existing dwelling and outbuilding).

  Split decision Demolition Trees
  Small domestic

• Stonington Christchurch Road Virginia Water GU25 4PJ

  RU.26/1165 50 yards away

  81% historically approved

  Details pursuant to Discharge Condition 6 (Landscape management plan) of planning permission RU.26/0586 Erection of a two storey detached dwelling with accomodation in the roof space including dormer windows in the front and rear elevations and attached double garage with ancillary acommodation over following the demolitio of the exisiting dwelling. (renewal of approved application RU.16/1530)

  Awaiting decision New dwelling Loft or dormer +1
  Domestic

• RU.26/0594 Refused

  49 Woodham Park Road Addlestone Surrey KT15 3SP

  T1- English Oak (Quercus robur), located in the rear of the property in a Westerly direction. The client proposes a reduction of 3m as part of the trees ongoing management and ensuring it doesn't outgrow its position. The tree is currently 19m high and 25m wide, and will be approximately 16m high and 22m wide following the proposed works.

  Received 14 May, published by the council 30 Jul 2026 Trees
• RU.26/0595 Decided

  53 Woodham Park Road Addlestone Surrey KT15 3TN

  T1- Silver Birch located in the rear of the property in a Southerly direction. The client proposes a reduction of 3m as part of the trees ongoing management to ensure it doesn't outgrow its position. It is currently 14m high and 4m wide and will be approximately 11m high and 2m wide following the proposed works. T2- Sycamore, 3 Birch & 4 Oak are a cluster of trees loaded at the rear boundary again in a southerly direction. They overhang 49 Woodham Park Roads building and the client would like them cut back by 1m to reduce the squirrels entering the roof of the property. They are currently 8.5m high and 4m wide and will remain 8.5m high and become 3m following the proposed works.

  Received 14 May, published by the council 30 Jul 2026 Trees
• RU.26/0569 Granted

  4 Simmons Place Staines-upon-thames Surrey TW18 3HW

  T1 Lime - reduce canopy by 1m metres to previous secondary pruning points. Reason - to reduce excessive shading and for the health of the tree.

  Received 14 May, published by the council 30 Jul 2026 Trees
• RU.26/0605 Granted

  16 Barons Wood Tite Hill Englefield Green Surrey TW20 0ND

  Oak: Crown Reduction - Reducing the height and spread of the tree by up to 1 metre. All arisings to be removed from site. Customer has requested maintenance work to the Oak tree in her garden to ensure it remains a suitable size for the space.

  Received 13 May, published by the council 30 Jul 2026 Trees
• RU.26/0576 Granted

  71 A Harpesford Avenue Virginia Water Surrey GU25 4RG

  T1 - Oak at front - fell - tree has Acute Oak Decline (AOD) The tree is in advanced decline, almost dead, due AOD evidenced by weeping exudates on the main stem and progressive and advanced canopy dieback monitored over 5+ years. Structural integrity and vitality are now significantly compromised. Given its proximity to the dwelling and highway (high target occupancy), retention presents an unacceptable foreseeable risk of failure and liability under duty of care obligations. Felling is therefore justified on arboricultural safety grounds.

  Received 8 May, published by the council 30 Jul 2026 Trees