Skip to content
PlanIndex Get alerts
Menu

Planning application

2 Beauforts Englefield Green Egham TW20 0DW

Decided Runnymede RU.25/1665 Trees

Works: Trees

Decided. The decision notice on the council portal carries the outcome in full, including any conditions.

Proposal

5 Day Notice for the removal of a Silver Birch which is covered by TPO 3C.

As published by the council, reference RU.25/1665

Application record

Reference
RU.25/1665
Type
Trees
Status
FINAL DECISION
Decision
Officers Comments
Received
20 Nov 2025
Validated
20 Nov 2025
Decided
2 Dec 2025
Postcode
TW20 0DW

Timeline

Dates from the published record

  1. 20 Nov 2025

    Received by Runnymede

  2. 2 Dec 2025

    Decision issued: Officers Comments

  3. 11 Aug 2026

    Added to PlanIndex

Documents

Plans, drawings, consultee responses and the officer's report

4 documents on file for this application

A planning file usually holds the application form, drawings and site plans, consultee responses, the officer's report and the decision notice.

Trade members open them from here.

Open the documents

After the decision

The process from here

The council has decided this application; the published outcome sits in the record above and the decision notice on the council portal carries the detail, including any conditions.

If permission was granted, work must normally begin within three years of the decision. If it was refused, the applicant can appeal within the statutory time limit or submit a revised scheme.

About trees applications

How this application type works

Tree applications cover work to protected trees: those under a tree preservation order need consent for pruning or felling, and trees in a conservation area need six weeks written notice before work starts. The council assesses the amenity value of the tree and can refuse consent, approve it with conditions, or in conservation areas make a preservation order in response.

More on trees applications in our guide

Nearby applications

Within 500 metres

  • 2 Beauforts Englefield Green Surrey TW20 0DW

    RU.26/0187 Submitted 27 Feb 2026 0m away

    T1 Oak: Thin by 20% i.e remove 1 in 5 branches internally, remove all dead branches and raise the canopy up to 5m from ground level. Reason to improve form and to improve light.

    Granted 6 docs
  • Byways, Barley Mow Road, Englefield Green, Surrey TW20 0NX

    RU.23/0210 Submitted 13 Feb 2023 67m away

    Proposed detached 2 bedroom annexe

    Refused 24 docs
  • The Barley Mow Barley Mow Road Englefield Green Surrey TW20 0NX

    RU.24/0579 Submitted 5 Jun 2024 67m away

    Single storey rear extension to pub

    Granted Extension 11 docs
    Small domestic
  • The Lodge St Jude's Close Englefield Green Surrey TW20 0DN

    RU.25/0985 Submitted 12 Aug 2025 79m away

    Works to tree covered by Tree Preservation Order: Copper beech (TPO 103 to rear within St Judes Close)- Crown thin by 20% .

    Granted Trees 6 docs
  • 15 Northcroft Road Englefield Green TW20 0DP

    RU.21/0742 Submitted 20 May 2021 115m away

    Proposed two storey side, rear and front extension, raised ridge with habitable accommodation within loft space (amended plans received 30/06/2021)

    Granted Extension 22 docs
  • 104 Vegal Crescent Englefield Green Surrey TW20 0QF

    RU.26/1100 135m away

    80% historically approved

    T1 English Oak (Quercus robur) - Fell and carefully dismantle to as near ground level as reasonably practicable. - Multiple fungal fruiting bodies affecting the basal / lower stem on several aspects; distinctly hollow response to sounding on the eastern aspect; strong evidence of established internal decay / cavity formation within the mechanically critical lower stem; substantial crown loading and significant surrounding targets.

    Awaiting decision

In Runnymede

  • RU.26/0594 Refused

    49 Woodham Park Road Addlestone Surrey KT15 3SP

    T1- English Oak (Quercus robur), located in the rear of the property in a Westerly direction. The client proposes a reduction of 3m as part of the trees ongoing management and ensuring it doesn't outgrow its position. The tree is currently 19m high and 25m wide, and will be approximately 16m high and 22m wide following the proposed works.

    14 May 2026 Trees
  • RU.26/0595 Decided

    53 Woodham Park Road Addlestone Surrey KT15 3TN

    T1- Silver Birch located in the rear of the property in a Southerly direction. The client proposes a reduction of 3m as part of the trees ongoing management to ensure it doesn't outgrow its position. It is currently 14m high and 4m wide and will be approximately 11m high and 2m wide following the proposed works. T2- Sycamore, 3 Birch & 4 Oak are a cluster of trees loaded at the rear boundary again in a southerly direction. They overhang 49 Woodham Park Roads building and the client would like them cut back by 1m to reduce the squirrels entering the roof of the property. They are currently 8.5m high and 4m wide and will remain 8.5m high and become 3m following the proposed works.

    14 May 2026 Trees
  • RU.26/0569 Granted

    4 Simmons Place Staines-upon-thames Surrey TW18 3HW

    T1 Lime - reduce canopy by 1m metres to previous secondary pruning points. Reason - to reduce excessive shading and for the health of the tree.

    14 May 2026 Trees
  • RU.26/0605 Granted

    16 Barons Wood Tite Hill Englefield Green Surrey TW20 0ND

    Oak: Crown Reduction - Reducing the height and spread of the tree by up to 1 metre. All arisings to be removed from site. Customer has requested maintenance work to the Oak tree in her garden to ensure it remains a suitable size for the space.

    13 May 2026 Trees
  • RU.26/0576 Granted

    71 A Harpesford Avenue Virginia Water Surrey GU25 4RG

    T1 - Oak at front - fell - tree has Acute Oak Decline (AOD) The tree is in advanced decline, almost dead, due AOD evidenced by weeping exudates on the main stem and progressive and advanced canopy dieback monitored over 5+ years. Structural integrity and vitality are now significantly compromised. Given its proximity to the dwelling and highway (high target occupancy), retention presents an unacceptable foreseeable risk of failure and liability under duty of care obligations. Felling is therefore justified on arboricultural safety grounds.

    8 May 2026 Trees