Skip to content
PlanIndex Get alerts
Menu

Planning application

97 Chertsey Lane Staines-upon-thames Surrey TW18 3LQ

Refused Runnymede RU.25/1605 Trees

Works: Trees Domestic

Read from the description, not a valuation. How we read the register

Refused. Only the applicant can appeal, within the statutory time limit, and a revised scheme can be submitted instead.

Proposal

Details pursuant to Discharge Condition 4 (Tree Protection Plan and Arboricultural Method Statement) of planning permission RU.25/0173 (Extensions and alterations to create a two storey dwelling with hipped roof and gable end projections , front and rear dormer windows and balcony)

As published by the council, reference RU.25/1605

Application record

Reference
RU.25/1605
Type
Trees
Status
Refused As published: FINAL DECISION
Decision
Refused As published: Refuse
Received
19 Nov 2025
Validated
19 Nov 2025
Decided
15 Dec 2025
Postcode
TW18 3LQ

Timeline

Dates from the published record

  1. 19 Nov 2025

    Received by Runnymede

  2. 15 Dec 2025

    Decision issued: Refuse

  3. 11 Aug 2026

    Added to PlanIndex

Documents

Plans, drawings, consultee responses and the officer's report

2 documents on file for this application

A planning file usually holds the application form, drawings and site plans, consultee responses, the officer's report and the decision notice.

Watch members (£5 a month) open the document list from here.

Open the documents

What this refusal means

Runnymede refused this application for the reasons on the decision notice; only the applicant can appeal, and refused schemes often return in revised form. More in our guide to what happens after a planning decision.

About tree works applications

Applications for works to trees cover protected trees: consent under a tree preservation order, or six weeks notice for trees in a conservation area. More in our guide to planning application types.

Nearby applications

Within 0.3 miles

  • 105a Chertsey Lane Staines-Upon-Thames TW18 3LQ

    RU.19/1434 Submitted 10 Oct 2019 50 yards away

    To construct 2 dormers in the roof of the already approved and built side extension.

    Granted Extension Loft or dormer 8 docs
  • 113 Chertsey Lane Staines-upon-thames Surrey TW18 3LQ

    RU.26/0881 50 yards away

    Loft conversion involving raised ridge by approx. 650mm; Erection of a rear dormer with french/sliding doors and glass balustrade; Installation of 7 x roof lights; Re-installation of existing solar panels; Replacing existing tiles with grey slates; 'Bricking Up' of existing gable end windows; Internal alterations

    Granted Loft or dormer Windows or glazing
  • 103 Chertsey Lane Staines-upon-thames Surrey TW18 3LQ

    RU.25/0260 Submitted 11 Mar 2025 50 yards away

    Certificate of Proposed Lawful Development for the construction of 4 no. hip roof Dormer windows.

    Granted Outline Loft or dormer Windows or glazing 20 docs
  • 103 Chertsey Lane Staines-upon-thames Surrey TW18 3LQ

    RU.24/1513 Submitted 28 Nov 2024 50 yards away

    Erection of 2m high brick wall to follow existing fence line and new steel electric gates following Demolition of existing wall, black steel gate and timber fence.

    Granted Other Demolition 11 docs
    Small domestic
  • 105a Chertsey Lane Staines Upon Thames Surrey TW18 3LQ

    RU.19/1747 Submitted 6 Dec 2019 50 yards away

    Application to discharge condition 4 (Gas membrane) of RU.19/0156

    Granted Conditions 5 docs
  • 103 Chertsey Lane Staines-upon-thames Surrey TW18 3LQ

    RU.26/0284 Submitted 11 Mar 2026 50 yards away

    Erection of timber gazebo within rear garden

    Granted 8 docs

In Runnymede

  • RU.26/0594 Refused

    49 Woodham Park Road Addlestone Surrey KT15 3SP

    T1- English Oak (Quercus robur), located in the rear of the property in a Westerly direction. The client proposes a reduction of 3m as part of the trees ongoing management and ensuring it doesn't outgrow its position. The tree is currently 19m high and 25m wide, and will be approximately 16m high and 22m wide following the proposed works.

    Received 14 May, published by the council 30 Jul 2026 Trees
  • RU.26/0595 Decided

    53 Woodham Park Road Addlestone Surrey KT15 3TN

    T1- Silver Birch located in the rear of the property in a Southerly direction. The client proposes a reduction of 3m as part of the trees ongoing management to ensure it doesn't outgrow its position. It is currently 14m high and 4m wide and will be approximately 11m high and 2m wide following the proposed works. T2- Sycamore, 3 Birch & 4 Oak are a cluster of trees loaded at the rear boundary again in a southerly direction. They overhang 49 Woodham Park Roads building and the client would like them cut back by 1m to reduce the squirrels entering the roof of the property. They are currently 8.5m high and 4m wide and will remain 8.5m high and become 3m following the proposed works.

    Received 14 May, published by the council 30 Jul 2026 Trees
  • RU.26/0569 Granted

    4 Simmons Place Staines-upon-thames Surrey TW18 3HW

    T1 Lime - reduce canopy by 1m metres to previous secondary pruning points. Reason - to reduce excessive shading and for the health of the tree.

    Received 14 May, published by the council 30 Jul 2026 Trees
  • RU.26/0605 Granted

    16 Barons Wood Tite Hill Englefield Green Surrey TW20 0ND

    Oak: Crown Reduction - Reducing the height and spread of the tree by up to 1 metre. All arisings to be removed from site. Customer has requested maintenance work to the Oak tree in her garden to ensure it remains a suitable size for the space.

    Received 13 May, published by the council 30 Jul 2026 Trees
  • RU.26/0576 Granted

    71 A Harpesford Avenue Virginia Water Surrey GU25 4RG

    T1 - Oak at front - fell - tree has Acute Oak Decline (AOD) The tree is in advanced decline, almost dead, due AOD evidenced by weeping exudates on the main stem and progressive and advanced canopy dieback monitored over 5+ years. Structural integrity and vitality are now significantly compromised. Given its proximity to the dwelling and highway (high target occupancy), retention presents an unacceptable foreseeable risk of failure and liability under duty of care obligations. Felling is therefore justified on arboricultural safety grounds.

    Received 8 May, published by the council 30 Jul 2026 Trees