Planning application
Halls Farm Cottage Row Town Addlestone Surrey KT15 1HL
Works: Trees Small domestic
Read from the description, not a valuation. How we read the register
Permission granted. Work must normally begin within three years of the decision or the permission lapses.
Proposal
T1 Pedunculate oak, OPM - Remove Nests, Remove two nests from west side of crown in lower lateral limbs approximately 5-6m from ground level T3 Pedunculate oak, Remove Dead Wood Over 50mm in Diameter Over Target, Remove major deadwood overhanging garden T4 Pedunculate oak OPM - Remove Nests, One nest in lower crown South side approximately 5m from ground level T57 Horse chestnut Fell to Ground Level (Directional Fell), Access restricted, vegetation clearance required to get over wire stock fence T58 Horse chestnut Dismantle to ground level, Vegetation clearance required for access T59 Horse chestnut Dismantle to ground level, Vegetation clearance required for access Only T1, T3, T4, T5, T58, T59 and G1 are covered by TPO
As published by the council, reference RU.25/1595
Application record
- Reference
- RU.25/1595
- Type
- Trees
- Status
- FINAL DECISION
- Decision
- Tree- Grant works to tree covered by TPO
- Received
- 14 Nov 2025
- Validated
- 14 Nov 2025
- Decided
- 18 Dec 2025
- Postcode
- KT15 1HL
Timeline
Dates from the published record
-
14 Nov 2025
Received by Runnymede
-
18 Dec 2025
Decision issued: Tree- Grant works to tree covered by TPO
-
11 Aug 2026
Added to PlanIndex
Documents
Plans, drawings, consultee responses and the officer's report
4 documents on file for this application
A planning file usually holds the application form, drawings and site plans, consultee responses, the officer's report and the decision notice.
Trade members open them from here.
Open the documentsWhat this grant of permission means
Runnymede granted permission on 18 December 2025, subject to any conditions on the decision notice. Work must normally begin within three years or the permission lapses. More in our guide to what happens after a planning decision.
About tree works applications
Applications for works to trees cover protected trees: consent under a tree preservation order, or six weeks notice for trees in a conservation area. More in our guide to planning application types.
Nearby applications
Within 500 metres
-
95 Row Town Addlestone Surrey KT15 1HQ
Erection of an additional storey above existing dwelling to create a two storey dwelling together with construction of a single storey rear extension following demolition of existing rear conservatory and renovation of property.
Granted Other Extension Demolition 17 docsSmall domestic -
119 Row Town Addlestone Surrey KT15 1HQ
Single storey side extension with pitched roof over. Construction of enclosed porch with pitched roof. Demolition of attached garage and formation of parking space.
Granted Other Extension Demolition 14 docsSmall domestic -
62 Row Town Addlestone Surrey KT15 1HQ
Proposed single storey rear extension with crown roof over, and single storey covered front porch incorporating new door/window configuration, crown roof with skylight and gabled roof overhang. Formation of small barn gable to existing front pitched roof, and removal/bricking up of one window to side elevation. Demolition of 2 outbuildings to rear.
Granted Other Extension Demolition +1 11 docsSmall domestic -
Small domestic
-
18 Old Road Addlestone Surrey KT15 1EW
Hip to gable roof alteration to rear, incorporation of rooflights to the side of the new roof, and new dormer to the existing side roof. Alterations to fenestration throughout, including updated windows and doors, moving of window on ground floor side elevation and installation of sliding aluminium doors to rear.
Granted Loft or dormer Roofing +1 16 docs -
Merlin Haven Old Road Addlestone KT15 1EW
Retrospective application for changes to land levels in the front garden, erection of new boundary screening with a maximum height of 2 metres and raised flower beds.
Granted Outline 17 docs
Other tree works applications
In Runnymede
-
RU.26/0594 Refused
49 Woodham Park Road Addlestone Surrey KT15 3SP
T1- English Oak (Quercus robur), located in the rear of the property in a Westerly direction. The client proposes a reduction of 3m as part of the trees ongoing management and ensuring it doesn't outgrow its position. The tree is currently 19m high and 25m wide, and will be approximately 16m high and 22m wide following the proposed works.
-
RU.26/0595 Decided
53 Woodham Park Road Addlestone Surrey KT15 3TN
T1- Silver Birch located in the rear of the property in a Southerly direction. The client proposes a reduction of 3m as part of the trees ongoing management to ensure it doesn't outgrow its position. It is currently 14m high and 4m wide and will be approximately 11m high and 2m wide following the proposed works. T2- Sycamore, 3 Birch & 4 Oak are a cluster of trees loaded at the rear boundary again in a southerly direction. They overhang 49 Woodham Park Roads building and the client would like them cut back by 1m to reduce the squirrels entering the roof of the property. They are currently 8.5m high and 4m wide and will remain 8.5m high and become 3m following the proposed works.
-
RU.26/0569 Granted
4 Simmons Place Staines-upon-thames Surrey TW18 3HW
T1 Lime - reduce canopy by 1m metres to previous secondary pruning points. Reason - to reduce excessive shading and for the health of the tree.
-
RU.26/0605 Granted
16 Barons Wood Tite Hill Englefield Green Surrey TW20 0ND
Oak: Crown Reduction - Reducing the height and spread of the tree by up to 1 metre. All arisings to be removed from site. Customer has requested maintenance work to the Oak tree in her garden to ensure it remains a suitable size for the space.
-
RU.26/0576 Granted
71 A Harpesford Avenue Virginia Water Surrey GU25 4RG
T1 - Oak at front - fell - tree has Acute Oak Decline (AOD) The tree is in advanced decline, almost dead, due AOD evidenced by weeping exudates on the main stem and progressive and advanced canopy dieback monitored over 5+ years. Structural integrity and vitality are now significantly compromised. Given its proximity to the dwelling and highway (high target occupancy), retention presents an unacceptable foreseeable risk of failure and liability under duty of care obligations. Felling is therefore justified on arboricultural safety grounds.