Planning application
Bmx Track Addlestone Moor Addlestone Surrey KT15 2QH
Works: Trees
Refused. Only the applicant can appeal, within the statutory time limit, and a revised scheme can be submitted instead.
Proposal
Details pursuant to Discharge Condition 7 (Tree protection) 8 (External lighting and floodlighting) and 9 (Construction Environmental Management Plan) of planning permission RU.23/0593 Installation of floodlights to existing BMX track.
As published by the council, reference RU.25/1455
Application record
- Reference
- RU.25/1455
- Type
- Trees
- Status
- FINAL DECISION
- Decision
- Refuse
- Received
- 17 Oct 2025
- Validated
- 17 Oct 2025
- Decided
- 17 Dec 2025
- Postcode
- KT15 2QH
Site history
Applications at this address on the Runnymede register
This site has had 2 applications since 2025: 1 approved, 1 refused.
-
RU.26/0314 Granted
Bmx Track Addlestone Moor Addlestone Surrey KT15 2QH
Details pursuant to Discharge Condition 7 (Tree protection) 8 (External lighting and floodlighting) and 9 (Construction Environmental Management Plan) of planning permission RU.23/0593 for : Installation of floodlights to existing BMX track.
Timeline
Dates from the published record
-
17 Oct 2025
Received by Runnymede
-
17 Dec 2025
Decision issued: Refuse
-
11 Aug 2026
Added to PlanIndex
Documents
Plans, drawings, consultee responses and the officer's report
12 documents on file for this application
A planning file usually holds the application form, drawings and site plans, consultee responses, the officer's report and the decision notice.
Trade members open them from here.
Open the documentsWhat this refusal means
Runnymede refused this application for the reasons on the decision notice; only the applicant can appeal, and refused schemes often return in revised form. More in our guide to what happens after a planning decision.
About tree works applications
Applications for works to trees cover protected trees: consent under a tree preservation order, or six weeks notice for trees in a conservation area. More in our guide to planning application types.
Nearby applications
Within 500 metres
-
The Woburn Arms Addlestone Moor Addlestone Surrey KT15 2QH
71% historically approved · decision due ~11 Jun
Alterations, additions and change of use from former Nursery to nine self-contained flats.
Awaiting decision Amendments New dwelling 25 docs -
Bmx Track Addlestone Moor Addlestone Surrey KT15 2QH
Details pursuant to Discharge Condition 7 (Tree protection) 8 (External lighting and floodlighting) and 9 (Construction Environmental Management Plan) of planning permission RU.23/0593 for : Installation of floodlights to existing BMX track.
Granted Trees 13 docs -
Philip Southcote School and Chertsey Fire Station Addlestone Moor Addlestone KT15 2QH
86% historically approved · decision due ~23 Apr
Details of a drainage verification report submitted pursuant to Condition 4 of planning permission ref: RU.22/0173 dated 22 July 2022 (this application is determined by Surrey County Council under application reference SCCRef-2025-0015)
Awaiting decision Conditions 2 docs -
Land at Philip Southcote School Addlestone Moor Addlestone KT15 2QH
Installation of Multi-use Games Area (MUGA), with associated fencing and floodlighting and laying of hardstanding for the use as a basketball court. (this application is determined by Surrey County Council under their ref SCCRef-2026-0095 - this record is for consultation only)
Granted -
Land at Philip Southcote School Addlestone Moor Addlestone KT15 2QH
80% historically approved
County Matter application for: Installation of Multi-use Games Area (MUGA), with associated fencing and floodlighting and laying of hardstanding for the use as a basketball court. (this application is determined by Surrey County Council under their ref SCCRef-2026-0095)
Awaiting decision -
Woburn Park Farm Addlestone Moor Addlestone KT15 2QF
Certificate of Proposed Lawful Development for: Erection of extension and alterations to building under Class H, Part 7 of the General Permitted Development Order.
Granted Outline Extension 15 docs
Other tree works applications
In Runnymede
-
RU.26/0594 Refused
49 Woodham Park Road Addlestone Surrey KT15 3SP
T1- English Oak (Quercus robur), located in the rear of the property in a Westerly direction. The client proposes a reduction of 3m as part of the trees ongoing management and ensuring it doesn't outgrow its position. The tree is currently 19m high and 25m wide, and will be approximately 16m high and 22m wide following the proposed works.
-
RU.26/0595 Decided
53 Woodham Park Road Addlestone Surrey KT15 3TN
T1- Silver Birch located in the rear of the property in a Southerly direction. The client proposes a reduction of 3m as part of the trees ongoing management to ensure it doesn't outgrow its position. It is currently 14m high and 4m wide and will be approximately 11m high and 2m wide following the proposed works. T2- Sycamore, 3 Birch & 4 Oak are a cluster of trees loaded at the rear boundary again in a southerly direction. They overhang 49 Woodham Park Roads building and the client would like them cut back by 1m to reduce the squirrels entering the roof of the property. They are currently 8.5m high and 4m wide and will remain 8.5m high and become 3m following the proposed works.
-
RU.26/0569 Granted
4 Simmons Place Staines-upon-thames Surrey TW18 3HW
T1 Lime - reduce canopy by 1m metres to previous secondary pruning points. Reason - to reduce excessive shading and for the health of the tree.
-
RU.26/0605 Granted
16 Barons Wood Tite Hill Englefield Green Surrey TW20 0ND
Oak: Crown Reduction - Reducing the height and spread of the tree by up to 1 metre. All arisings to be removed from site. Customer has requested maintenance work to the Oak tree in her garden to ensure it remains a suitable size for the space.
-
RU.26/0576 Granted
71 A Harpesford Avenue Virginia Water Surrey GU25 4RG
T1 - Oak at front - fell - tree has Acute Oak Decline (AOD) The tree is in advanced decline, almost dead, due AOD evidenced by weeping exudates on the main stem and progressive and advanced canopy dieback monitored over 5+ years. Structural integrity and vitality are now significantly compromised. Given its proximity to the dwelling and highway (high target occupancy), retention presents an unacceptable foreseeable risk of failure and liability under duty of care obligations. Felling is therefore justified on arboricultural safety grounds.