Skip to content
PlanIndex Get alerts
Menu

Planning application

Russets Knowle Grove Virginia Water Surrey GU25 4JD

Withdrawn Runnymede RU.25/0275 Trees

Works: Trees

Withdrawn before a decision, so it carries no planning weight. A revised scheme can be submitted at any time.

Proposal

T1 Oak: Crown reduce by approx 2m to maintain at current dimensions, improve light and form of tree, mitigate limb failure by reducing wind sail T3 Large Oak tree in rear left side of garden: Reduce overall crown by approx 2m focusing on reducing the weight and length of the over-extended lateral branches to improve trees integrity, improve light and maintain at current dimensions T4 Large oak tree located in railway/unknown land: Reduce overhanging branches by 2m to mitigate encroachment (tree is taking all the goodness from client's grass due to lack of light and water uptake)

As published by the council, reference RU.25/0275

Application record

Reference
RU.25/0275
Type
Trees
Status
Withdrawn As published: WITHDRAWN
Decision
Withdrawn As published: Withdrawn Decision
Received
10 Mar 2025
Validated
10 Mar 2025
Postcode
GU25 4JD

Timeline

Dates from the published record

  1. 10 Mar 2025

    Received by Runnymede

  2. 30 Jul 2026

    Added to PlanIndex

Documents

Plans, drawings, consultee responses and the officer's report

4 documents on file for this application

A planning file usually holds the application form, drawings and site plans, consultee responses, the officer's report and the decision notice.

Watch members (£5 a month) open the document list from here.

Open the documents

What withdrawal means

The applicant withdrew this application before Runnymede decided it, and is free to submit a revised scheme at any time. More in our guide to what happens after a planning decision.

About tree works applications

Applications for works to trees cover protected trees: consent under a tree preservation order, or six weeks notice for trees in a conservation area. More in our guide to planning application types.

Nearby applications

Within 500 metres

  • Heatherwood Knowle Grove Virginia Water Surrey GU25 4JD

    RU.24/1449 Submitted 1 Nov 2024 0m away

    Single storey rear extension.

    Granted Extension 6 docs
    Small domestic
  • Pipers Moon Knowle Grove Virginia Water GU25 4JD

    RU.21/1057 Submitted 7 Jul 2021 0m away

    Details persuant to Discharge Condition 4 (Land Contamination) of Planning Permission RU.21/0604

    Split decision Conditions 7 docs
  • Cambria Knowle Grove Virginia Water GU25 4JD

    RU.21/0860 Submitted 9 Jun 2021 0m away

    Variation of condition 2 of Planning Permission RU.18/1375 to enable alterations to the fenestration and addition of dormer windows to the front and rear elevations and alterations to the first floor layout.

    Granted Conditions Loft or dormer Windows or glazing 6 docs
  • Oak Tree House Knowle Grove Virginia Water GU25 4JD

    RU.21/0560 Submitted 15 Apr 2021 0m away

    Erection of a detached dwelling with basement, including access and parking following the demolition of the existing dwelling (amended plans received 08/07/2021)

    Granted Other New dwelling Demolition 38 docs
    Domestic
  • Woodlands Knowle Grove Virginia Water Surrey GU25 4JD

    RU.25/1784 Submitted 17 Dec 2025 0m away

    Details pursuant to Discharge Condition 5 (Potentially contaminated land small sites - installation) of planning permission RU.25/1156 (Application to vary Condition 2 (Approved Plans) and 5 (Potentially contaminated land -small sites - installation) of RU.25/0261.

    Granted Conditions 2 docs
  • Heatherwood Knowle Grove Virginia Water Surrey GU25 4JD

    RU.23/0132 Submitted 6 Feb 2023 0m away

    Extensions, remodeling and reconfiguration of an existing 2 storey dwelling

    Granted Extension 15 docs
    Domestic

In Runnymede

  • RU.26/0594 Refused

    49 Woodham Park Road Addlestone Surrey KT15 3SP

    T1- English Oak (Quercus robur), located in the rear of the property in a Westerly direction. The client proposes a reduction of 3m as part of the trees ongoing management and ensuring it doesn't outgrow its position. The tree is currently 19m high and 25m wide, and will be approximately 16m high and 22m wide following the proposed works.

    Received 14 May, published by the council 30 Jul 2026 Trees
  • RU.26/0595 Decided

    53 Woodham Park Road Addlestone Surrey KT15 3TN

    T1- Silver Birch located in the rear of the property in a Southerly direction. The client proposes a reduction of 3m as part of the trees ongoing management to ensure it doesn't outgrow its position. It is currently 14m high and 4m wide and will be approximately 11m high and 2m wide following the proposed works. T2- Sycamore, 3 Birch & 4 Oak are a cluster of trees loaded at the rear boundary again in a southerly direction. They overhang 49 Woodham Park Roads building and the client would like them cut back by 1m to reduce the squirrels entering the roof of the property. They are currently 8.5m high and 4m wide and will remain 8.5m high and become 3m following the proposed works.

    Received 14 May, published by the council 30 Jul 2026 Trees
  • RU.26/0569 Granted

    4 Simmons Place Staines-upon-thames Surrey TW18 3HW

    T1 Lime - reduce canopy by 1m metres to previous secondary pruning points. Reason - to reduce excessive shading and for the health of the tree.

    Received 14 May, published by the council 30 Jul 2026 Trees
  • RU.26/0605 Granted

    16 Barons Wood Tite Hill Englefield Green Surrey TW20 0ND

    Oak: Crown Reduction - Reducing the height and spread of the tree by up to 1 metre. All arisings to be removed from site. Customer has requested maintenance work to the Oak tree in her garden to ensure it remains a suitable size for the space.

    Received 13 May, published by the council 30 Jul 2026 Trees
  • RU.26/0576 Granted

    71 A Harpesford Avenue Virginia Water Surrey GU25 4RG

    T1 - Oak at front - fell - tree has Acute Oak Decline (AOD) The tree is in advanced decline, almost dead, due AOD evidenced by weeping exudates on the main stem and progressive and advanced canopy dieback monitored over 5+ years. Structural integrity and vitality are now significantly compromised. Given its proximity to the dwelling and highway (high target occupancy), retention presents an unacceptable foreseeable risk of failure and liability under duty of care obligations. Felling is therefore justified on arboricultural safety grounds.

    Received 8 May, published by the council 30 Jul 2026 Trees