Planning application
11 Lime Tree Walk Virginia Water Surrey GU25 4SW
Works: Trees
Permission granted. Work must normally begin within three years of the decision or the permission lapses.
Proposal
TPO Tree Works: T1 - Lime tree in back garden, tree has a height of approximately 6.5 metres and spread of approximately 6 metres. Proposed works are to re-pollard to previous pruning points, leaving the tree with a height of approximately 4 metres and spread of approximately 4 metres. These works are being carried out to continue cyclical pruning of tree, give clearance from building and allow light into garden and property. T2 - Lime tree to front of property, tree has a height of approximately 8 metres and spread of approximately 5 metres. Proposed works are to remove selected low limbs to raise crown to height of 2m and reduce crown by approximately 1-1.5 metres to previous pruning points, leaving tree with a height of approximately 6.5 metres and spread of approximately 6 metres. T3 - Beech tree to front of property, tree has a height of approximately 8 metres and spread of approximately 5.5 metres. Proposed works are to remove selected branches to lift crown to height of approximately 2 metres and reduce tree to previous pruning points, leaving a height of approximately 6.5 metres and spread of approximately 4 metres. Works to T2 & T3 are being carried out to give clearance from property and allow light into garden and property.
As published by the council, reference RU.24/1288
Application record
- Reference
- RU.24/1288
- Type
- Trees
- Status
- Granted As published: FINAL DECISION
- Decision
- Granted As published: Tree- Grant works to tree covered by TPO
- Received
- 26 Sep 2024
- Validated
- 26 Sep 2024
- Decided
- 6 Nov 2024
- Postcode
- GU25 4SW
Timeline
Dates from the published record
-
26 Sep 2024
Received by Runnymede
-
6 Nov 2024
Decision issued: Tree- Grant works to tree covered by TPO
-
30 Jul 2026
Added to PlanIndex
Documents
Plans, drawings, consultee responses and the officer's report
7 documents on file for this application
A planning file usually holds the application form, drawings and site plans, consultee responses, the officer's report and the decision notice.
Watch members (£5 a month) open the document list from here.
Open the documentsWhat this grant of permission means
Runnymede granted permission on 6 November 2024, subject to any conditions on the decision notice. Work must normally begin within three years or the permission lapses. More in our guide to what happens after a planning decision.
About tree works applications
Applications for works to trees cover protected trees: consent under a tree preservation order, or six weeks notice for trees in a conservation area. More in our guide to planning application types.
Nearby applications
Within 0.3 miles
-
-
17 Lime Tree Walk Virginia Water Surrey GU25 4SW
T1 - Lime - re-pollard to manage size and shape T2 - Lime - re-pollard to manage size and shape T3 - London Plane - reduce lateral growth towards house by 2m to leave finished spread of 6m. Branches are touching roof of property.
Granted Trees 4 docs -
22 Upper Walk Virginia Water Surrey GU25 4SN
Retrospective application for a single storey rear extension to replace existing conservatory
Granted Amendments Extension 13 docsSmall domestic -
6 Cypress Court Virginia Water GU25 4TB
REMOVAL OF DINING ROOM WINDOWS, ADAPT OPENING & INSTALL BI-FOLDING DOOR
Granted Windows or glazing 5 docs -
Trotsworth Court Residents Trotsworth Court Christchurch Road Virginia Water Surrey GU25 4AH
T5 Lime-remove basal growth, T9 Beech-Reduce laterals on SE side by 1.5m to leave a spread of 9m. T10 Lime, T12 Birch, T13 Lime, Raise canopy to 2.5m over path and 5.5m over road. G3 2no dead Sycamores-Fell. Trees numbers relate to submitted plan.
Granted Trees 5 docs -
Crossland House Christchurch Road Virginia Water Surrey GU25 4BH
Listed Building Consent for repairs to an existing conservatory.
Granted Heritage and listed buildings Extension 20 docs
Other tree works applications
In Runnymede
-
RU.26/0594 Refused
49 Woodham Park Road Addlestone Surrey KT15 3SP
T1- English Oak (Quercus robur), located in the rear of the property in a Westerly direction. The client proposes a reduction of 3m as part of the trees ongoing management and ensuring it doesn't outgrow its position. The tree is currently 19m high and 25m wide, and will be approximately 16m high and 22m wide following the proposed works.
-
RU.26/0595 Decided
53 Woodham Park Road Addlestone Surrey KT15 3TN
T1- Silver Birch located in the rear of the property in a Southerly direction. The client proposes a reduction of 3m as part of the trees ongoing management to ensure it doesn't outgrow its position. It is currently 14m high and 4m wide and will be approximately 11m high and 2m wide following the proposed works. T2- Sycamore, 3 Birch & 4 Oak are a cluster of trees loaded at the rear boundary again in a southerly direction. They overhang 49 Woodham Park Roads building and the client would like them cut back by 1m to reduce the squirrels entering the roof of the property. They are currently 8.5m high and 4m wide and will remain 8.5m high and become 3m following the proposed works.
-
RU.26/0569 Granted
4 Simmons Place Staines-upon-thames Surrey TW18 3HW
T1 Lime - reduce canopy by 1m metres to previous secondary pruning points. Reason - to reduce excessive shading and for the health of the tree.
-
RU.26/0605 Granted
16 Barons Wood Tite Hill Englefield Green Surrey TW20 0ND
Oak: Crown Reduction - Reducing the height and spread of the tree by up to 1 metre. All arisings to be removed from site. Customer has requested maintenance work to the Oak tree in her garden to ensure it remains a suitable size for the space.
-
RU.26/0576 Granted
71 A Harpesford Avenue Virginia Water Surrey GU25 4RG
T1 - Oak at front - fell - tree has Acute Oak Decline (AOD) The tree is in advanced decline, almost dead, due AOD evidenced by weeping exudates on the main stem and progressive and advanced canopy dieback monitored over 5+ years. Structural integrity and vitality are now significantly compromised. Given its proximity to the dwelling and highway (high target occupancy), retention presents an unacceptable foreseeable risk of failure and liability under duty of care obligations. Felling is therefore justified on arboricultural safety grounds.