Planning application
Villa Santa Maria St Anns Hill Road Chertsey Surrey KT16 9EN
Works: Trees
Permission granted. Work must normally begin within three years of the decision or the permission lapses.
Proposal
TPO Tree Works: T1 - Dead Oak - exemption notice required T2 - Chestnut - remove defected limb over road and raise canopy up to 5.5m - mechanical damage to limb, canopy hanging over road and requires lifting to comply with Highways regulations. T3 - Ash - reduce stem over road by 4m - Ash die back in place - reduce back to live growth T4 - Oak - reduce lower section over road by 4m. Raise canopy over road up to 5.5m. Limb extends over pavement and road towards the primary school on opposite corner T5 - Oak with collapsed stem - reduce remaining section by 8m - half of tree has collapsed - work required to balance remaining section to make safe and prevent future failure.
As published by the council, reference RU.24/1283
Application record
- Reference
- RU.24/1283
- Type
- Trees
- Status
- FINAL DECISION
- Decision
- Tree- Grant works to tree covered by TPO
- Received
- 23 Sep 2024
- Validated
- 23 Sep 2024
- Decided
- 1 Nov 2024
- Postcode
- KT16 9EN
Timeline
Dates from the published record
-
23 Sep 2024
Received by Runnymede
-
1 Nov 2024
Decision issued: Tree- Grant works to tree covered by TPO
-
30 Jul 2026
Added to PlanIndex
Documents
Plans, drawings, consultee responses and the officer's report
4 documents on file for this application
A planning file usually holds the application form, drawings and site plans, consultee responses, the officer's report and the decision notice.
Trade members open them from here.
Open the documentsWhat this grant of permission means
Runnymede granted permission on 1 November 2024, subject to any conditions on the decision notice. Work must normally begin within three years or the permission lapses. More in our guide to what happens after a planning decision.
About tree works applications
Applications for works to trees cover protected trees: consent under a tree preservation order, or six weeks notice for trees in a conservation area. More in our guide to planning application types.
Nearby applications
Within 500 metres
-
Villa Santa Maria 1 Ruxbury Road Chertsey Surrey KT16 9EN
Certificate of Proposed Lawful Development for the construction of an outbuilding
Granted Outline 8 docs -
Chilsey Green Farm Pycroft Road, Chertsey Chertsey KT16 9EP
Details pursuant to Discharge Condition 4 (Hard and Soft Landscaping) of planning permission RU.21/0893 for the erection of 170 dwellings and the provision of five permanent serviced pitches for gypsies/travellers including associated parking, landscaping, public open space and infrastructure following demolition of the existing outbuildings on site. (revised description reducing the number of dwellings from 186 to 170 and providing five gypsy/traveller pitches)
Granted Conditions Demolition 5 docsMajor scheme -
Grange Farm Pyrcroft Road Chertsey KT16 9EP
Application to vary Section 106 agreement of application RU.22/1569
Granted Conditions 11 docs -
Chilsey Green Farm Pyrcroft Road Chertsey KT16 9EP
Application to vary Section 106 agreement of application RU.21/0893
Granted Conditions 4 docs -
Grange Farm Grange Farm, Pyrcroft Road, Chertsey Chertsey KT16 9EP
Details pursuant to Discharge Condition 15 (Construction Environmental Management Plan) of planning permission RU.22/1569 for the Erection of 69 dwellings including demolition of existing buildings, associated parking, landscaping, open space and infrastructure works at Grange Farm, Chertsey.
Refused Conditions Demolition 6 docsMajor scheme -
Grange Farm Grange Farm, Pyrcroft Road, Chertsey Chertsey KT16 9EP
Details pursuant to Discharge Condition 8 - (Surface Water Drainage) of planning permission RU.22/1569 Erection of 69 dwellings including demolition of existing buildings, associated parking, landscaping, open space and infrastructure works at Grange Farm, Chertsey.
Refused Conditions Demolition 4 docsMajor scheme
Other tree works applications
In Runnymede
-
RU.26/0594 Refused
49 Woodham Park Road Addlestone Surrey KT15 3SP
T1- English Oak (Quercus robur), located in the rear of the property in a Westerly direction. The client proposes a reduction of 3m as part of the trees ongoing management and ensuring it doesn't outgrow its position. The tree is currently 19m high and 25m wide, and will be approximately 16m high and 22m wide following the proposed works.
-
RU.26/0595 Decided
53 Woodham Park Road Addlestone Surrey KT15 3TN
T1- Silver Birch located in the rear of the property in a Southerly direction. The client proposes a reduction of 3m as part of the trees ongoing management to ensure it doesn't outgrow its position. It is currently 14m high and 4m wide and will be approximately 11m high and 2m wide following the proposed works. T2- Sycamore, 3 Birch & 4 Oak are a cluster of trees loaded at the rear boundary again in a southerly direction. They overhang 49 Woodham Park Roads building and the client would like them cut back by 1m to reduce the squirrels entering the roof of the property. They are currently 8.5m high and 4m wide and will remain 8.5m high and become 3m following the proposed works.
-
RU.26/0569 Granted
4 Simmons Place Staines-upon-thames Surrey TW18 3HW
T1 Lime - reduce canopy by 1m metres to previous secondary pruning points. Reason - to reduce excessive shading and for the health of the tree.
-
RU.26/0605 Granted
16 Barons Wood Tite Hill Englefield Green Surrey TW20 0ND
Oak: Crown Reduction - Reducing the height and spread of the tree by up to 1 metre. All arisings to be removed from site. Customer has requested maintenance work to the Oak tree in her garden to ensure it remains a suitable size for the space.
-
RU.26/0576 Granted
71 A Harpesford Avenue Virginia Water Surrey GU25 4RG
T1 - Oak at front - fell - tree has Acute Oak Decline (AOD) The tree is in advanced decline, almost dead, due AOD evidenced by weeping exudates on the main stem and progressive and advanced canopy dieback monitored over 5+ years. Structural integrity and vitality are now significantly compromised. Given its proximity to the dwelling and highway (high target occupancy), retention presents an unacceptable foreseeable risk of failure and liability under duty of care obligations. Felling is therefore justified on arboricultural safety grounds.