Skip to content
PlanIndex Get alerts
Menu

Planning application

Coxes Lock Bourneside Road Addlestone Surrey KT15 2JX

Granted Runnymede RU.24/1124 Trees

Works: Trees

Permission granted. Work must normally begin within three years of the decision or the permission lapses.

Proposal

Ash tree - To take down as has Ash die back in it, it is also causing damage to walls Willow Tree - To dead wood and reduce by half causing damage to wall and drains Conifer Tree - To take down as causing damage to walls and drains

As published by the council, reference RU.24/1124

Application record

Reference
RU.24/1124
Type
Trees
Status
FINAL DECISION
Decision
Tree - No objection to tree work in Conservation Area
Received
3 Sep 2024
Validated
3 Sep 2024
Decided
7 Oct 2024
Postcode
KT15 2JX

Timeline

Dates from the published record

  1. 3 Sep 2024

    Received by Runnymede

  2. 7 Oct 2024

    Decision issued: Tree - No objection to tree work in Conservation Area

  3. 31 Aug 2026

    Added to PlanIndex

Documents

Plans, drawings, consultee responses and the officer's report

5 documents on file for this application

A planning file usually holds the application form, drawings and site plans, consultee responses, the officer's report and the decision notice.

Trade members open them from here.

Open the documents

What a grant of permission means

The process from here

Permission has been granted, usually subject to conditions listed on the decision notice, some of which must be discharged before work starts. The decision notice on the council portal sets out exactly what was approved.

Work must normally begin within three years of the decision or the permission lapses. Neighbours cannot appeal a grant; challenging one means judicial review of how the decision was made, within tight time limits.

About trees applications

How this application type works

Tree applications cover work to protected trees: those under a tree preservation order need consent for pruning or felling, and trees in a conservation area need six weeks written notice before work starts. The council assesses the amenity value of the tree and can refuse consent, approve it with conditions, or in conservation areas make a preservation order in response.

More on trees applications in our guide

Nearby applications

Within 500 metres

  • Daniel Lambert Mill Bourneside Road Addlestone Surrey KT15 2JX

    RU.24/0599 Submitted 9 May 2024 0m away

    Listed Building Consent for the replacement of the existing finish to 6 no dormer cheeks with dark grey Glass Reinforced Plastic (GRP) and a dark grey powder coated metal edged trim

    Withdrawn Heritage and listed buildings Loft or dormer 6 docs
  • 5 Ember Close Addlestone Surrey KT15 2JH

    RU.25/0178 Submitted 3 Mar 2025 160m away

    Certificate of Proposed Lawful Development for the siting of a mobile home within the garden for use as an annex to the existing dwellinghouse.

    Granted Amendments 6 docs
    Domestic
  • 10 Ember Close Addlestone Surrey KT15 2JH

    RU.25/0518 Submitted 15 Apr 2025 160m away

    85% historically approved · decision due ~10 Jun

    Appeal against enforcement notice - Planning Inspectorate reference APP/Q3630/C/25/3362675

    Awaiting decision Other 8 docs
  • Land adjacent to 124 Bourneside Road Addlestone KT15 2JD

    RU.26/0790 195m away

    T1 - Field Maple - Consent is sought to reduce the crown of the tree by 2 m. The tree has a growth-bias over the neighbouring property and the intention is to do most of the reduction on the northern side to alleviate the overhanging branches which are overbearing.

    Granted Trees
  • 120 Bourneside Road Addlestone KT15 2JD

    RU.19/1564 Submitted 30 Oct 2019 197m away

    Single storey front extension

    Granted Extension 11 docs
    Small domestic
  • 118 Bourneside Road Addlestone Surrey KT15 2JD

    RU.24/1101 Submitted 21 Aug 2024 197m away

    Single storey front and rear extensions.

    Granted Extension 21 docs
    Small domestic

In Runnymede

  • RU.26/0594 Refused

    49 Woodham Park Road Addlestone Surrey KT15 3SP

    T1- English Oak (Quercus robur), located in the rear of the property in a Westerly direction. The client proposes a reduction of 3m as part of the trees ongoing management and ensuring it doesn't outgrow its position. The tree is currently 19m high and 25m wide, and will be approximately 16m high and 22m wide following the proposed works.

    14 May 2026 Trees
  • RU.26/0595 Decided

    53 Woodham Park Road Addlestone Surrey KT15 3TN

    T1- Silver Birch located in the rear of the property in a Southerly direction. The client proposes a reduction of 3m as part of the trees ongoing management to ensure it doesn't outgrow its position. It is currently 14m high and 4m wide and will be approximately 11m high and 2m wide following the proposed works. T2- Sycamore, 3 Birch & 4 Oak are a cluster of trees loaded at the rear boundary again in a southerly direction. They overhang 49 Woodham Park Roads building and the client would like them cut back by 1m to reduce the squirrels entering the roof of the property. They are currently 8.5m high and 4m wide and will remain 8.5m high and become 3m following the proposed works.

    14 May 2026 Trees
  • RU.26/0569 Granted

    4 Simmons Place Staines-upon-thames Surrey TW18 3HW

    T1 Lime - reduce canopy by 1m metres to previous secondary pruning points. Reason - to reduce excessive shading and for the health of the tree.

    14 May 2026 Trees
  • RU.26/0605 Granted

    16 Barons Wood Tite Hill Englefield Green Surrey TW20 0ND

    Oak: Crown Reduction - Reducing the height and spread of the tree by up to 1 metre. All arisings to be removed from site. Customer has requested maintenance work to the Oak tree in her garden to ensure it remains a suitable size for the space.

    13 May 2026 Trees
  • RU.26/0576 Granted

    71 A Harpesford Avenue Virginia Water Surrey GU25 4RG

    T1 - Oak at front - fell - tree has Acute Oak Decline (AOD) The tree is in advanced decline, almost dead, due AOD evidenced by weeping exudates on the main stem and progressive and advanced canopy dieback monitored over 5+ years. Structural integrity and vitality are now significantly compromised. Given its proximity to the dwelling and highway (high target occupancy), retention presents an unacceptable foreseeable risk of failure and liability under duty of care obligations. Felling is therefore justified on arboricultural safety grounds.

    8 May 2026 Trees