Planning application
River Bourne Health Club Heriot Road Chertsey Surrey KT16 9DR
Works: Trees
Permission granted. Work must normally begin within three years of the decision or the permission lapses.
Proposal
T1 - Hornbeam - reduce by 2m back to previous pruning points to leave finished height of 5m and finished spread of 4m T2 - Maple - reduce by 2m back to previous pruning points to leave finished height of 6m and finished spread of 4m T3 - Maple - reduce by 2m back to previous pruning points to leave finished height of 6m and spread of 4m T4 - Yew - reduce by 2m back to previous pruning points to leave finished height of 5m and finished spread of 3m T5 - Maple -reduce by 2m back to previous pruning pointsto leave finished height of 6m and finished spread of 4m The trees are obscuring CCTV cameras and Runnymede BC have approached River Bourne Health Club to cut back the trees to allow clear visibility from the cameras
As published by the council, reference RU.24/1062
Application record
- Reference
- RU.24/1062
- Type
- Trees
- Status
- FINAL DECISION
- Decision
- Tree - No objection to tree work in Conservation Area
- Received
- 15 Aug 2024
- Validated
- 15 Aug 2024
- Decided
- 16 Sep 2024
- Postcode
- KT16 9DR
Timeline
Dates from the published record
-
15 Aug 2024
Received by Runnymede
-
16 Sep 2024
Decision issued: Tree - No objection to tree work in Conservation Area
-
31 Aug 2026
Added to PlanIndex
Documents
Plans, drawings, consultee responses and the officer's report
4 documents on file for this application
A planning file usually holds the application form, drawings and site plans, consultee responses, the officer's report and the decision notice.
Trade members open them from here.
Open the documentsWhat this grant of permission means
Runnymede granted permission on 16 September 2024, subject to any conditions on the decision notice. Work must normally begin within three years or the permission lapses. More in our guide to what happens after a planning decision.
About tree works applications
Applications for works to trees cover protected trees: consent under a tree preservation order, or six weeks notice for trees in a conservation area. More in our guide to planning application types.
Nearby applications
Within 500 metres
-
River Bourne Health Club Heriot Road Chertsey KT16 9DR
4no. trees of mixed species at the front of the building reduce canopy by no more than 2.5m. 6no. trees mixed species surrounding the building carry out canopy reduction by no more than 2.5m 4no. willow trees at the rear of the building - Fell.
Granted Trees 4 docs -
2 Burwood Parade Guildford Street Chertsey KT16 9AE
Certificate of Proposed Lawful Development for change of use from Class E(a) to Class E(b).
Granted Amendments 4 docs -
Portman House (Formerly Rutherwyk House) Guildford Street Chertsey KT16 9AY
Application for approval of details pursuant to conditions 2 (noise mitigation) and 3 (flood risk management and evacuation plan) of Prior Approval RU.19/1367 (Proposed Change of use from office to 29 no self-contained residential dwellings)
Granted Conditions 9 docs -
Land to the rear of portman house Guilford Street Chertsey Chertsey KT169AY
Application seeking approval of details reserved by planning condition 14 (drainage verification report) of planning application RU.19/1823 for the proposed erection of a 3-storey building containing 6 no. residential apartments (Use Class C3)
Granted Conditions New dwelling 5 docs -
43-43a Guildford Street Chertsey Surrey KT16 9BA
Listed Building Consent for patch repair and redecoration of side wall, including colour change to black to match front elevation.
Refused Heritage and listed buildings 12 docs -
83- 87 Guildford Street Chertsey KT16 9AS
Application seeking full planning permission for the construction of a 3-storey rear extension with roof accommodation containing 5no. new apartments and alteration of 2no. existing apartments with associated parking, cycle and bin stores.
Granted Full applications New dwelling Extension 38 docsSeveral homes
Other tree works applications
In Runnymede
-
RU.26/0594 Refused
49 Woodham Park Road Addlestone Surrey KT15 3SP
T1- English Oak (Quercus robur), located in the rear of the property in a Westerly direction. The client proposes a reduction of 3m as part of the trees ongoing management and ensuring it doesn't outgrow its position. The tree is currently 19m high and 25m wide, and will be approximately 16m high and 22m wide following the proposed works.
-
RU.26/0595 Decided
53 Woodham Park Road Addlestone Surrey KT15 3TN
T1- Silver Birch located in the rear of the property in a Southerly direction. The client proposes a reduction of 3m as part of the trees ongoing management to ensure it doesn't outgrow its position. It is currently 14m high and 4m wide and will be approximately 11m high and 2m wide following the proposed works. T2- Sycamore, 3 Birch & 4 Oak are a cluster of trees loaded at the rear boundary again in a southerly direction. They overhang 49 Woodham Park Roads building and the client would like them cut back by 1m to reduce the squirrels entering the roof of the property. They are currently 8.5m high and 4m wide and will remain 8.5m high and become 3m following the proposed works.
-
RU.26/0569 Granted
4 Simmons Place Staines-upon-thames Surrey TW18 3HW
T1 Lime - reduce canopy by 1m metres to previous secondary pruning points. Reason - to reduce excessive shading and for the health of the tree.
-
RU.26/0605 Granted
16 Barons Wood Tite Hill Englefield Green Surrey TW20 0ND
Oak: Crown Reduction - Reducing the height and spread of the tree by up to 1 metre. All arisings to be removed from site. Customer has requested maintenance work to the Oak tree in her garden to ensure it remains a suitable size for the space.
-
RU.26/0576 Granted
71 A Harpesford Avenue Virginia Water Surrey GU25 4RG
T1 - Oak at front - fell - tree has Acute Oak Decline (AOD) The tree is in advanced decline, almost dead, due AOD evidenced by weeping exudates on the main stem and progressive and advanced canopy dieback monitored over 5+ years. Structural integrity and vitality are now significantly compromised. Given its proximity to the dwelling and highway (high target occupancy), retention presents an unacceptable foreseeable risk of failure and liability under duty of care obligations. Felling is therefore justified on arboricultural safety grounds.