Planning application
Oak House 38 Fletcher Road Ottershaw Surrey KT16 0JZ
Works: Trees
Permission granted. Work must normally begin within three years of the decision or the permission lapses.
Proposal
Common Oak tree situated at the front of the property. 2m maximum overall reduction to the tree. The North to East boundary 5m and below 0.5m reduction. From assessment from the patio garden of the property the tree has a very low crown break leading to long extended limbs. The tree appears be unbalanced in the direction towards the road and parking area. Reduction to make long extended limbs safer and to rebalance the tree.
As published by the council, reference RU.24/0966
Application record
- Reference
- RU.24/0966
- Type
- Trees
- Status
- FINAL DECISION
- Decision
- Tree- Grant works to tree covered by TPO
- Received
- 22 Jul 2024
- Validated
- 22 Jul 2024
- Decided
- 11 Sep 2024
- Postcode
- KT16 0JZ
Timeline
Dates from the published record
-
22 Jul 2024
Received by Runnymede
-
11 Sep 2024
Decision issued: Tree- Grant works to tree covered by TPO
-
31 Aug 2026
Added to PlanIndex
Documents
Plans, drawings, consultee responses and the officer's report
4 documents on file for this application
A planning file usually holds the application form, drawings and site plans, consultee responses, the officer's report and the decision notice.
Trade members open them from here.
Open the documentsWhat a grant of permission means
The process from here
Permission has been granted, usually subject to conditions listed on the decision notice, some of which must be discharged before work starts. The decision notice on the council portal sets out exactly what was approved.
Work must normally begin within three years of the decision or the permission lapses. Neighbours cannot appeal a grant; challenging one means judicial review of how the decision was made, within tight time limits.
About trees applications
How this application type works
Tree applications cover work to protected trees: those under a tree preservation order need consent for pruning or felling, and trees in a conservation area need six weeks written notice before work starts. The council assesses the amenity value of the tree and can refuse consent, approve it with conditions, or in conservation areas make a preservation order in response.
Nearby applications
Within 500 metres
-
34 Fletcher Road Ottershaw KT16 0JZ
Non-material amendment to planning approval RU.21/0327 (Fenestration changes to existing ground floor extension First floor rear extension above existing single storey extension Conversion of existing garage and roof to be pitched Porch alterations - changes to fenestration and new pitch roof) for 3 metre bi-folding doors on rear elevation replacing window and French doors. Retention of wall between lounge and dining room.
Granted Amendments Extension Windows or glazing 8 docsSmall domestic -
10 Fletcher Close Ottershaw KT16 0JT
PROPOSED SINGLE STOREY REAR EXTENSION.
Granted Extension 14 docsSmall domestic -
10 Wheatsheaf Close Chertsey Surrey KT16 0JA
Formation of dormer to rear roof elevation, installation of rooflight to front elevation & new window to side flank, facilitating loft conversion & internal alterations.
Granted Loft or dormer Windows or glazing 11 docs -
14 Wheatsheaf Close Chertsey Surrey KT16 0JA
Prior Approval for a single storey rear extension with a depth of 5.00 metres beyond the rear wall of the original dwelling house with a maximum height of 3.80 metres and eaves height of 3.00 metres
Granted Outline Extension 8 docsSmall domestic -
7 Fletcher Road Ottershaw Surrey KT16 0JY
Single storey rear extension following demolition of existing conservatory.
Granted Other Extension Demolition 9 docsSmall domestic -
15 Fletcher Road Ottershaw Surrey KT16 0JY
Certificate of Proposed Lawfulness for the construction of rear facing dormer and front rooflights.
Granted Outline Loft or dormer 7 docs
Other trees applications
In Runnymede
-
RU.26/0594 Refused
49 Woodham Park Road Addlestone Surrey KT15 3SP
T1- English Oak (Quercus robur), located in the rear of the property in a Westerly direction. The client proposes a reduction of 3m as part of the trees ongoing management and ensuring it doesn't outgrow its position. The tree is currently 19m high and 25m wide, and will be approximately 16m high and 22m wide following the proposed works.
-
RU.26/0595 Decided
53 Woodham Park Road Addlestone Surrey KT15 3TN
T1- Silver Birch located in the rear of the property in a Southerly direction. The client proposes a reduction of 3m as part of the trees ongoing management to ensure it doesn't outgrow its position. It is currently 14m high and 4m wide and will be approximately 11m high and 2m wide following the proposed works. T2- Sycamore, 3 Birch & 4 Oak are a cluster of trees loaded at the rear boundary again in a southerly direction. They overhang 49 Woodham Park Roads building and the client would like them cut back by 1m to reduce the squirrels entering the roof of the property. They are currently 8.5m high and 4m wide and will remain 8.5m high and become 3m following the proposed works.
-
RU.26/0569 Granted
4 Simmons Place Staines-upon-thames Surrey TW18 3HW
T1 Lime - reduce canopy by 1m metres to previous secondary pruning points. Reason - to reduce excessive shading and for the health of the tree.
-
RU.26/0605 Granted
16 Barons Wood Tite Hill Englefield Green Surrey TW20 0ND
Oak: Crown Reduction - Reducing the height and spread of the tree by up to 1 metre. All arisings to be removed from site. Customer has requested maintenance work to the Oak tree in her garden to ensure it remains a suitable size for the space.
-
RU.26/0576 Granted
71 A Harpesford Avenue Virginia Water Surrey GU25 4RG
T1 - Oak at front - fell - tree has Acute Oak Decline (AOD) The tree is in advanced decline, almost dead, due AOD evidenced by weeping exudates on the main stem and progressive and advanced canopy dieback monitored over 5+ years. Structural integrity and vitality are now significantly compromised. Given its proximity to the dwelling and highway (high target occupancy), retention presents an unacceptable foreseeable risk of failure and liability under duty of care obligations. Felling is therefore justified on arboricultural safety grounds.