Skip to content
PlanIndex Get alerts
Menu

Planning application

5 Chaworth Close Ottershaw Surrey KT16 0LS

Granted Runnymede RU.24/0933 Trees

Works: Trees

Permission granted. Work must normally begin within three years of the decision or the permission lapses.

Proposal

Tree T1 - Sweet Chestnut - reduce canopy of tree to just below 3 metres from ground level at a point just above the primary branch break. This is to remove the overhanging branches from the path Tree T2 - Scots Pine removal of 3 lowest branches from Scotch pine. Branches to be pruned back to the parent stem. The tree in question sits in the middle of a group of 3 Scots Pine. The reason for the work is to offset the weight of the tree which is growing towards the property.

As published by the council, reference RU.24/0933

Application record

Reference
RU.24/0933
Type
Trees
Status
Granted As published: FINAL DECISION
Decision
Granted As published: Tree- Grant works to tree covered by TPO
Received
18 Jul 2024
Validated
18 Jul 2024
Decided
11 Sep 2024
Postcode
KT16 0LS

Timeline

Dates from the published record

  1. 18 Jul 2024

    Received by Runnymede

  2. 11 Sep 2024

    Decision issued: Tree- Grant works to tree covered by TPO

  3. 31 Aug 2026

    Added to PlanIndex

Documents

Plans, drawings, consultee responses and the officer's report

6 documents on file for this application

A planning file usually holds the application form, drawings and site plans, consultee responses, the officer's report and the decision notice.

Watch members (£5 a month) open the document list from here.

Open the documents

What this grant of permission means

Runnymede granted permission on 11 September 2024, subject to any conditions on the decision notice. Work must normally begin within three years or the permission lapses. More in our guide to what happens after a planning decision.

About tree works applications

Applications for works to trees cover protected trees: consent under a tree preservation order, or six weeks notice for trees in a conservation area. More in our guide to planning application types.

Nearby applications

Within 0.3 miles

  • 8 Chaworth Close Ottershaw Chertsey Surrey KT16 0LS

    RU.26/1335 50 yards away

    5 day notice - T1 Oak fell to ground level. Reason;- Significant decay within buttress affecting the structural integrity of the tree. Major decline within the crown.

    Granted Trees
  • 139 Brox Road Ottershaw KT16 0LG

    RU.21/0950 Submitted 17 Jun 2021 200 yards away

    Double storey side and with single storey rear extension replacing existing detached garage.

    Granted Extension 16 docs
    Small domestic
  • 117 Brox Road Ottershaw Surrey KT16 0LG

    RU.26/0172 Submitted 18 Feb 2026 200 yards away

    Erection of a two storey rear extension. Alterations to existing single storey side/rear extension roof including removal of lantern light. New patio/decking to replace existing.

    Granted Extension 16 docs
    Small domestic
  • 145 Brox Road Ottershaw KT16 0LG

    RU.24/1047 Submitted 19 Aug 2024 200 yards away

    Single storey side extension

    Granted Extension 10 docs
    Small domestic
  • 143 Brox Road Ottershaw Surrey KT16 0LG

    RU.26/0425 Submitted 15 Apr 2026 200 yards away

    Proposed two storey side extension, single storey front extension, single storey rear extension, new pitched roof to existing, folllowing demolition of existing garage.

    Granted Other Extension Demolition 18 docs
    Small domestic
  • 149 Brox Road Ottershaw Surrey KT16 0LG

    RU.26/0418 Submitted 10 Apr 2026 200 yards away

    Single storey rear/side extension with part dual pitch, part flat roof over, and tiled canopy to front door. Two storey side extension with continuation of gable end over, following demolition of garage & shed.

    Granted Other Extension Demolition 13 docs
    Small domestic

In Runnymede

  • RU.26/0594 Refused

    49 Woodham Park Road Addlestone Surrey KT15 3SP

    T1- English Oak (Quercus robur), located in the rear of the property in a Westerly direction. The client proposes a reduction of 3m as part of the trees ongoing management and ensuring it doesn't outgrow its position. The tree is currently 19m high and 25m wide, and will be approximately 16m high and 22m wide following the proposed works.

    Received 14 May, published by the council 30 Jul 2026 Trees
  • RU.26/0595 Decided

    53 Woodham Park Road Addlestone Surrey KT15 3TN

    T1- Silver Birch located in the rear of the property in a Southerly direction. The client proposes a reduction of 3m as part of the trees ongoing management to ensure it doesn't outgrow its position. It is currently 14m high and 4m wide and will be approximately 11m high and 2m wide following the proposed works. T2- Sycamore, 3 Birch & 4 Oak are a cluster of trees loaded at the rear boundary again in a southerly direction. They overhang 49 Woodham Park Roads building and the client would like them cut back by 1m to reduce the squirrels entering the roof of the property. They are currently 8.5m high and 4m wide and will remain 8.5m high and become 3m following the proposed works.

    Received 14 May, published by the council 30 Jul 2026 Trees
  • RU.26/0569 Granted

    4 Simmons Place Staines-upon-thames Surrey TW18 3HW

    T1 Lime - reduce canopy by 1m metres to previous secondary pruning points. Reason - to reduce excessive shading and for the health of the tree.

    Received 14 May, published by the council 30 Jul 2026 Trees
  • RU.26/0605 Granted

    16 Barons Wood Tite Hill Englefield Green Surrey TW20 0ND

    Oak: Crown Reduction - Reducing the height and spread of the tree by up to 1 metre. All arisings to be removed from site. Customer has requested maintenance work to the Oak tree in her garden to ensure it remains a suitable size for the space.

    Received 13 May, published by the council 30 Jul 2026 Trees
  • RU.26/0576 Granted

    71 A Harpesford Avenue Virginia Water Surrey GU25 4RG

    T1 - Oak at front - fell - tree has Acute Oak Decline (AOD) The tree is in advanced decline, almost dead, due AOD evidenced by weeping exudates on the main stem and progressive and advanced canopy dieback monitored over 5+ years. Structural integrity and vitality are now significantly compromised. Given its proximity to the dwelling and highway (high target occupancy), retention presents an unacceptable foreseeable risk of failure and liability under duty of care obligations. Felling is therefore justified on arboricultural safety grounds.

    Received 8 May, published by the council 30 Jul 2026 Trees