Planning application
Rear Of 30 London Street Chertsey Surrey KT16 8AA
Works: Trees
Withdrawn before a decision, so it carries no planning weight. A revised scheme can be submitted at any time.
Proposal
Works to a tree in the Conservation Area: 1. At the back of the car park is an Ash Tree (Fraxinus Excelsior) - reduced by 40% 2, 3, 4. The group froward of this on the opposite side of the car park are Beech (Fagus sylvatica) - reduced by 45% Near your entrance are 3 trees 5,6. Conifers (Leylandii) - to be reduced by 45% 7. Maple (Acer) - to be reduced by 45%
As published by the council, reference RU.24/0397
Application record
- Reference
- RU.24/0397
- Type
- Trees
- Status
- WITHDRAWN
- Decision
- Withdrawn Decision
- Received
- 19 Apr 2024
- Validated
- 19 Apr 2024
- Postcode
- KT16 8AA
Timeline
Dates from the published record
-
19 Apr 2024
Received by Runnymede
-
31 Aug 2026
Added to PlanIndex
Documents
Plans, drawings, consultee responses and the officer's report
3 documents on file for this application
A planning file usually holds the application form, drawings and site plans, consultee responses, the officer's report and the decision notice.
Trade members open them from here.
Open the documentsWhat withdrawal means
The applicant withdrew this application before Runnymede decided it, and is free to submit a revised scheme at any time. More in our guide to what happens after a planning decision.
About tree works applications
Applications for works to trees cover protected trees: consent under a tree preservation order, or six weeks notice for trees in a conservation area. More in our guide to planning application types.
Nearby applications
Within 500 metres
-
44 London Street Chertsey Surrey KT16 8AA
G1 Ash - Stem overhanging garden of 46 London street to the south west of the tree - re-pollard at previous secondary pollard point. Two stems growing west over the garden of 34 London Street. Re-pollard end growth (approximately 3 metres) and thin epicormic growth on these stems by 30 %. Dead stem in centre of the tree. Reduce to suitable height to make safe. Reason - to reduce the risk of failure.
Granted Trees 5 docs -
The Compasses 26-28 London Street Chertsey KT16 8AA
Application seeking approval of details reserved by planning conditions 3 (Flood Risk Management Plan and Evacuation Plan) 6 (details of windows) and 7 (proposed samples) of planning application RU.19/1072 for the proposed change of use of the existing house in multiple occupation to provide self-contained flats.
Granted Conditions New dwelling Windows or glazing 19 docs -
34 London Street Chertsey Surrey KT16 8AA
T1 Ash (Fraxinus excelsior) removed due to its proximity to the garage. The tree will not make maturity and may cause structural damage in the future. T3 Magnolia reduced by 1.5 metres to improve light T4 Silver birch (Betula pendula) removed due to its poor form and proximity to the building (2 metres)
Granted Trees -
25 London Street Chertsey KT16 8AP
Details pursuant to discharge conditions 3 (External Materials), 4 (Boundary Treatments), 5 (Brickwork to Match No 21) 6 (Flood Risk Management Plan), 7 (Gas Membrane) 9 (EV Charger), 10 (Cycle Storage), 11 (Water Efficiency) and 12 (Biodiversity) of application RU.23/1040 for a Part two storey, part first floor extension to form 1 x Studio flat at first floor
Split decision Conditions Extension 11 docs -
15 London Street Chertsey Surrey KT16 8AP
Advertisement consent for 1x illuminated sign replacing existing illuminated sign to front plinth and 3x non illuminated signs replacing existing signs to access road, gate and main building'
Granted Advertising 12 docs -
1A London street Surrey Chertsey KT16 8AP
Prior approval application for Change of use from Commercial, Business and Service (Use Class E) to form 4 residential units (Use Class C3) under the Town and Country Planning (General Permitted Development) (England) Order 2015 as amended Schedule 2, Part 3, Class MA
Refused Amendments 20 docs
Other tree works applications
In Runnymede
-
RU.26/0594 Refused
49 Woodham Park Road Addlestone Surrey KT15 3SP
T1- English Oak (Quercus robur), located in the rear of the property in a Westerly direction. The client proposes a reduction of 3m as part of the trees ongoing management and ensuring it doesn't outgrow its position. The tree is currently 19m high and 25m wide, and will be approximately 16m high and 22m wide following the proposed works.
-
RU.26/0595 Decided
53 Woodham Park Road Addlestone Surrey KT15 3TN
T1- Silver Birch located in the rear of the property in a Southerly direction. The client proposes a reduction of 3m as part of the trees ongoing management to ensure it doesn't outgrow its position. It is currently 14m high and 4m wide and will be approximately 11m high and 2m wide following the proposed works. T2- Sycamore, 3 Birch & 4 Oak are a cluster of trees loaded at the rear boundary again in a southerly direction. They overhang 49 Woodham Park Roads building and the client would like them cut back by 1m to reduce the squirrels entering the roof of the property. They are currently 8.5m high and 4m wide and will remain 8.5m high and become 3m following the proposed works.
-
RU.26/0569 Granted
4 Simmons Place Staines-upon-thames Surrey TW18 3HW
T1 Lime - reduce canopy by 1m metres to previous secondary pruning points. Reason - to reduce excessive shading and for the health of the tree.
-
RU.26/0605 Granted
16 Barons Wood Tite Hill Englefield Green Surrey TW20 0ND
Oak: Crown Reduction - Reducing the height and spread of the tree by up to 1 metre. All arisings to be removed from site. Customer has requested maintenance work to the Oak tree in her garden to ensure it remains a suitable size for the space.
-
RU.26/0576 Granted
71 A Harpesford Avenue Virginia Water Surrey GU25 4RG
T1 - Oak at front - fell - tree has Acute Oak Decline (AOD) The tree is in advanced decline, almost dead, due AOD evidenced by weeping exudates on the main stem and progressive and advanced canopy dieback monitored over 5+ years. Structural integrity and vitality are now significantly compromised. Given its proximity to the dwelling and highway (high target occupancy), retention presents an unacceptable foreseeable risk of failure and liability under duty of care obligations. Felling is therefore justified on arboricultural safety grounds.