Skip to content
PlanIndex Get alerts
Menu

Planning application

429 Woodham Lane Woodham Surrey KT15 3QE

Granted Runnymede RU.24/0302 Trees

Works: Trees Domestic

Read from the description, not a valuation. How we read the register

Permission granted. Work must normally begin within three years of the decision or the permission lapses.

Proposal

Details pursuant to Discharge Condition 4 (Tree protection) of planning permission RU.23/1710 for the Part single, part two storey front, side and rear extensions. Increase in height of dwelling with addition of a first floor to create a two storey property, following demolition of existing side extension and covered way.

As published by the council, reference RU.24/0302

Application record

Reference
RU.24/0302
Type
Trees
Status
Granted As published: FINAL DECISION
Decision
Granted As published: Approve
Received
27 Mar 2024
Validated
27 Mar 2024
Postcode
KT15 3QE

Timeline

Dates from the published record

  1. 27 Mar 2024

    Received by Runnymede

  2. 31 Aug 2026

    Added to PlanIndex

Documents

Plans, drawings, consultee responses and the officer's report

6 documents on file for this application

A planning file usually holds the application form, drawings and site plans, consultee responses, the officer's report and the decision notice.

Watch members (£5 a month) open the document list from here.

Open the documents

What this grant of permission means

Runnymede granted permission, subject to any conditions on the decision notice. Work must normally begin within three years or the permission lapses. More in our guide to what happens after a planning decision.

About tree works applications

Applications for works to trees cover protected trees: consent under a tree preservation order, or six weeks notice for trees in a conservation area. More in our guide to planning application types.

Nearby applications

Within 0.3 miles

  • 435 Woodham Lane Addlestone Surrey KT15 3QE

    RU.24/1427 Submitted 30 Oct 2024 50 yards away

    Certificate of Proposed lawful development for: new dormer to bathroom on rear roof.

    Granted Outline Loft or dormer 6 docs
  • Oleander Westwood Avenue Addlestone Surrey KT15 3QF

    RU.22/1746 Submitted 23 Nov 2022 100 yards away

    Certificate of Existing Lawfulness for single storey rear and side extension with garage conversion.

    Granted Amendments Extension 11 docs
    Small domestic
  • Endsleigh Faris Lane Addlestone Surrey KT15 3DJ

    RU.23/1140 Submitted 20 Sep 2023 150 yards away

    Demolition of existing rear conservatory and construction of a replacement single storey rear extension, alterations to fenestration including replacement Anthracite grey doors and windows and re-rendered external walls.

    Granted Other Extension Demolition +1 10 docs
    Small domestic
  • Woodstock Faris Lane Woodham KT15 3DJ

    RU.23/0478 Submitted 28 Mar 2023 150 yards away

    Oak - Reduce branches as necessary to achieve no more than 3m clearance of the service wires. (as shown on submitted images)

    Granted 4 docs
  • Endsleigh Faris Lane Addlestone Surrey KT15 3DJ

    RU.26/0491 Submitted 23 Apr 2026 150 yards away

    T1 Oak to front of Endsleigh - Reduce canopy by 2 metres to suitable live growth points. Also remove all dead wood. Reason: to enhance the structural integrity and health and reduce the risk of branch failure

    Granted 5 docs
  • Tarka Sheerwater Avenue Woodham Surrey KT15 3DP

    RU.25/1734 Submitted 12 Dec 2025 150 yards away

    Part retrospective application for a single storey rear & side extension with garage conversion all covered by a new pitched roof, and detached double garage to front. (Application is a combination of works under approvals RU.24/0254 & RU.25/0311)

    Granted Amendments Extension 10 docs
    Small domestic

In Runnymede

  • RU.26/0594 Refused

    49 Woodham Park Road Addlestone Surrey KT15 3SP

    T1- English Oak (Quercus robur), located in the rear of the property in a Westerly direction. The client proposes a reduction of 3m as part of the trees ongoing management and ensuring it doesn't outgrow its position. The tree is currently 19m high and 25m wide, and will be approximately 16m high and 22m wide following the proposed works.

    Received 14 May, published by the council 30 Jul 2026 Trees
  • RU.26/0595 Decided

    53 Woodham Park Road Addlestone Surrey KT15 3TN

    T1- Silver Birch located in the rear of the property in a Southerly direction. The client proposes a reduction of 3m as part of the trees ongoing management to ensure it doesn't outgrow its position. It is currently 14m high and 4m wide and will be approximately 11m high and 2m wide following the proposed works. T2- Sycamore, 3 Birch & 4 Oak are a cluster of trees loaded at the rear boundary again in a southerly direction. They overhang 49 Woodham Park Roads building and the client would like them cut back by 1m to reduce the squirrels entering the roof of the property. They are currently 8.5m high and 4m wide and will remain 8.5m high and become 3m following the proposed works.

    Received 14 May, published by the council 30 Jul 2026 Trees
  • RU.26/0569 Granted

    4 Simmons Place Staines-upon-thames Surrey TW18 3HW

    T1 Lime - reduce canopy by 1m metres to previous secondary pruning points. Reason - to reduce excessive shading and for the health of the tree.

    Received 14 May, published by the council 30 Jul 2026 Trees
  • RU.26/0605 Granted

    16 Barons Wood Tite Hill Englefield Green Surrey TW20 0ND

    Oak: Crown Reduction - Reducing the height and spread of the tree by up to 1 metre. All arisings to be removed from site. Customer has requested maintenance work to the Oak tree in her garden to ensure it remains a suitable size for the space.

    Received 13 May, published by the council 30 Jul 2026 Trees
  • RU.26/0576 Granted

    71 A Harpesford Avenue Virginia Water Surrey GU25 4RG

    T1 - Oak at front - fell - tree has Acute Oak Decline (AOD) The tree is in advanced decline, almost dead, due AOD evidenced by weeping exudates on the main stem and progressive and advanced canopy dieback monitored over 5+ years. Structural integrity and vitality are now significantly compromised. Given its proximity to the dwelling and highway (high target occupancy), retention presents an unacceptable foreseeable risk of failure and liability under duty of care obligations. Felling is therefore justified on arboricultural safety grounds.

    Received 8 May, published by the council 30 Jul 2026 Trees