Skip to content
PlanIndex Get alerts
Menu

Planning application

Oakwood Lodge 3 Stuart Way Virginia Water GU25 4QA

Granted Runnymede RU.21/1526 Trees

Works: Trees

Permission granted. Work must normally begin within three years of the decision or the permission lapses.

Proposal

Details pursuant to Condition 2 (tree protection) and Condition 3 (Replacement trees) of planning permission RU.21/0611 (Two Storey side extension)

As published by the council, reference RU.21/1526

Application record

Reference
RU.21/1526
Type
Trees
Status
FINAL DECISION
Decision
Approve
Received
3 Sep 2021
Validated
3 Sep 2021
Decided
10 Sep 2021
Postcode
GU25 4QA

Site history

Applications at this address on the Runnymede register

This site has had 2 applications since 2021: 2 approved, 0 refused.

  • RU.21/0611 Granted

    Oakwood Lodge 3 Stuart Way Virginia Water GU25 4QA

    2 storey side extension

    Decided 12 Aug 2021

Timeline

Dates from the published record

  1. 3 Sep 2021

    Received by Runnymede

  2. 10 Sep 2021

    Decision issued: Approve

  3. 3 Sep 2026

    Added to PlanIndex

Documents

Plans, drawings, consultee responses and the officer's report

5 documents on file for this application

A planning file usually holds the application form, drawings and site plans, consultee responses, the officer's report and the decision notice.

Trade members open them from here.

Open the documents

What this grant of permission means

Runnymede granted permission on 10 September 2021, subject to any conditions on the decision notice. Work must normally begin within three years or the permission lapses. More in our guide to what happens after a planning decision.

About tree works applications

Applications for works to trees cover protected trees: consent under a tree preservation order, or six weeks notice for trees in a conservation area. More in our guide to planning application types.

Nearby applications

Within 500 metres

  • Lendenhurst Stuart Way Virginia Water Surrey GU25 4QA

    RU.23/0175 Submitted 22 Feb 2023 0m away

    Variation of condition 2, 4, 5 and 6 of approved application RU.22/0596 to enlarge the rear terrace and for the inclusion of an outdoor swimming pool.

    Granted Conditions 18 docs
  • Clarence House Stuart Way Virginia Water Surrey GU25 4QA

    RU.25/0133 Submitted 11 Feb 2025 0m away

    Variation of condition 2 drawing numbers to planning approval RU.24/1034 (application for the variation of condition 2 (Approved Plans) of RU.24/0103), to allow the retention of the front section of the garage rather than the rear section.

    Granted Conditions 6 docs
  • Oakwood Lodge 3 Stuart Way Virginia Water GU25 4QA

    RU.21/0611 Submitted 21 Apr 2021 0m away

    2 storey side extension

    Granted Extension 22 docs
  • Manor Mead School, Christchurch Road, Virginia Water, GU25 4PX

    RU.26/0726 78m away

    Details of Speed Reduction Measures, Construction Environmental Management Plan (CEMP) and Arboricultural Method Statement submitted pursuant to Conditions 8, 12 and 14 of planning permission ref: RU.25/1493 dated 20 February 2026. (this application is determined by Surrey County Council under their ref SCCRef-2026-0086 - this record is for consultation only)

    Granted
  • Manor Mead School, Christchurch Road, Virginia Water, GU25 4PX

    RU.26/1065 78m away

    80% historically approved

    Details of Updated Bat Survey submitted pursuant to Condition 13 of planning permission ref: RU.25/1493 dated 20 February 2026 (this application is determined by Surrey County Council under their ref SCCRef-2026-0130)

    Awaiting decision
  • Manor Mead School, Christchurch Road, Virginia Water, GU25 4PX

    RU.26/0850 78m away

    Details of strategy to deal with potential risks associated with contamination submitted pursuant to Condition 22 of planning permission ref: RU.25/1493 dated 20 February 2026. (this application is determined by Surrey County Council under their ref SCCRef-2026-0097 - this record is for consultation only)

    Granted

In Runnymede

  • RU.26/0594 Refused

    49 Woodham Park Road Addlestone Surrey KT15 3SP

    T1- English Oak (Quercus robur), located in the rear of the property in a Westerly direction. The client proposes a reduction of 3m as part of the trees ongoing management and ensuring it doesn't outgrow its position. The tree is currently 19m high and 25m wide, and will be approximately 16m high and 22m wide following the proposed works.

    14 May 2026 Trees
  • RU.26/0595 Decided

    53 Woodham Park Road Addlestone Surrey KT15 3TN

    T1- Silver Birch located in the rear of the property in a Southerly direction. The client proposes a reduction of 3m as part of the trees ongoing management to ensure it doesn't outgrow its position. It is currently 14m high and 4m wide and will be approximately 11m high and 2m wide following the proposed works. T2- Sycamore, 3 Birch & 4 Oak are a cluster of trees loaded at the rear boundary again in a southerly direction. They overhang 49 Woodham Park Roads building and the client would like them cut back by 1m to reduce the squirrels entering the roof of the property. They are currently 8.5m high and 4m wide and will remain 8.5m high and become 3m following the proposed works.

    14 May 2026 Trees
  • RU.26/0569 Granted

    4 Simmons Place Staines-upon-thames Surrey TW18 3HW

    T1 Lime - reduce canopy by 1m metres to previous secondary pruning points. Reason - to reduce excessive shading and for the health of the tree.

    14 May 2026 Trees
  • RU.26/0605 Granted

    16 Barons Wood Tite Hill Englefield Green Surrey TW20 0ND

    Oak: Crown Reduction - Reducing the height and spread of the tree by up to 1 metre. All arisings to be removed from site. Customer has requested maintenance work to the Oak tree in her garden to ensure it remains a suitable size for the space.

    13 May 2026 Trees
  • RU.26/0576 Granted

    71 A Harpesford Avenue Virginia Water Surrey GU25 4RG

    T1 - Oak at front - fell - tree has Acute Oak Decline (AOD) The tree is in advanced decline, almost dead, due AOD evidenced by weeping exudates on the main stem and progressive and advanced canopy dieback monitored over 5+ years. Structural integrity and vitality are now significantly compromised. Given its proximity to the dwelling and highway (high target occupancy), retention presents an unacceptable foreseeable risk of failure and liability under duty of care obligations. Felling is therefore justified on arboricultural safety grounds.

    8 May 2026 Trees