Skip to content
PlanIndex Get alerts
Menu

Planning application

9 Bearwood Close Addlestone Surrey KT15 1JQ

Granted Runnymede RU.19/1584 Trees

Works: Trees

Permission granted. Work must normally begin within three years of the decision or the permission lapses.

Proposal

To remove 3 lower branches from the douglas fir tree to the rear of the property, remove deadwood and crownlift to 2m, to abate nuisance of encroaching branches.

As published by the council, reference RU.19/1584

Application record

Reference
RU.19/1584
Type
Trees
Status
FINAL DECISION
Decision
Tree- Grant works to tree covered by TPO
Received
1 Nov 2019
Validated
1 Nov 2019
Decided
24 Dec 2019
Postcode
KT15 1JQ

Timeline

Dates from the published record

  1. 1 Nov 2019

    Received by Runnymede

  2. 24 Dec 2019

    Decision issued: Tree- Grant works to tree covered by TPO

  3. 21 Aug 2026

    Added to PlanIndex

Documents

Plans, drawings, consultee responses and the officer's report

4 documents on file for this application

A planning file usually holds the application form, drawings and site plans, consultee responses, the officer's report and the decision notice.

Trade members open them from here.

Open the documents

What a grant of permission means

The process from here

Permission has been granted, usually subject to conditions listed on the decision notice, some of which must be discharged before work starts. The decision notice on the council portal sets out exactly what was approved.

Work must normally begin within three years of the decision or the permission lapses. Neighbours cannot appeal a grant; challenging one means judicial review of how the decision was made, within tight time limits.

About trees applications

How this application type works

Tree applications cover work to protected trees: those under a tree preservation order need consent for pruning or felling, and trees in a conservation area need six weeks written notice before work starts. The council assesses the amenity value of the tree and can refuse consent, approve it with conditions, or in conservation areas make a preservation order in response.

More on trees applications in our guide

Nearby applications

Within 500 metres

  • 12 Coombelands Lane Addlestone Surrey KT15 1JJ

    RU.24/1282 Submitted 25 Sep 2024 46m away

    Prior Approval for a single storey rear extension with a depth of 6.00 metres beyond the rear wall of the original dwelling house with a maximum height of 3.07 metres and eaves height of 3.07 metres.

    Granted Outline Extension 16 docs
    Small domestic
  • 12 Coombelands Lane Addlestone Surrey KT15 1JJ

    RU.23/0339 Submitted 8 Mar 2023 46m away

    Single storey side and rear extension following the demolition of the existing outbuilding.

    Granted Other Extension Demolition 23 docs
    Small domestic
  • COOMBELANDS SHOPS ONGAR HILL Runnymede KT15 1JH

    RU.21/1079 Submitted 5 Jul 2021 67m away

    Application to determine if prior approval is required for the installation of a new 18m high Phase 8 3HG street pole and associated 3no. equipment cabinets.

    Refused Outline 27 docs
  • 33 Ongar Place Addlestone Surrey KT15 1JF

    RU.24/0880 Submitted 17 Jul 2024 74m away

    Single storey side and rear extension.

    Granted Extension 13 docs
    Small domestic
  • 32 Ongar Place Addlestone KT15 1JF

    RU.21/0642 Submitted 27 Apr 2021 74m away

    Certificate of lawfulness to determine whether the conversion of the existing garage to habitable accommodation, the enclosing of the existing porch area, and the erection of a roof light to the existing single storey rear flat roof is lawful.

    Granted Amendments Extension Loft or dormer 6 docs
    Small domestic
  • 32 Liberty Rise Addlestone Surrey KT15 1NU

    RU.25/1067 Submitted 12 Aug 2025 139m away

    Works to Tree covered by TPO: Red oak - cut back over house and driveway by 2-3m to appropriate growth points to reduce detritous on roof and driveway.

    Granted Trees 6 docs

In Runnymede

  • RU.26/0594 Refused

    49 Woodham Park Road Addlestone Surrey KT15 3SP

    T1- English Oak (Quercus robur), located in the rear of the property in a Westerly direction. The client proposes a reduction of 3m as part of the trees ongoing management and ensuring it doesn't outgrow its position. The tree is currently 19m high and 25m wide, and will be approximately 16m high and 22m wide following the proposed works.

    14 May 2026 Trees
  • RU.26/0595 Decided

    53 Woodham Park Road Addlestone Surrey KT15 3TN

    T1- Silver Birch located in the rear of the property in a Southerly direction. The client proposes a reduction of 3m as part of the trees ongoing management to ensure it doesn't outgrow its position. It is currently 14m high and 4m wide and will be approximately 11m high and 2m wide following the proposed works. T2- Sycamore, 3 Birch & 4 Oak are a cluster of trees loaded at the rear boundary again in a southerly direction. They overhang 49 Woodham Park Roads building and the client would like them cut back by 1m to reduce the squirrels entering the roof of the property. They are currently 8.5m high and 4m wide and will remain 8.5m high and become 3m following the proposed works.

    14 May 2026 Trees
  • RU.26/0569 Granted

    4 Simmons Place Staines-upon-thames Surrey TW18 3HW

    T1 Lime - reduce canopy by 1m metres to previous secondary pruning points. Reason - to reduce excessive shading and for the health of the tree.

    14 May 2026 Trees
  • RU.26/0605 Granted

    16 Barons Wood Tite Hill Englefield Green Surrey TW20 0ND

    Oak: Crown Reduction - Reducing the height and spread of the tree by up to 1 metre. All arisings to be removed from site. Customer has requested maintenance work to the Oak tree in her garden to ensure it remains a suitable size for the space.

    13 May 2026 Trees
  • RU.26/0576 Granted

    71 A Harpesford Avenue Virginia Water Surrey GU25 4RG

    T1 - Oak at front - fell - tree has Acute Oak Decline (AOD) The tree is in advanced decline, almost dead, due AOD evidenced by weeping exudates on the main stem and progressive and advanced canopy dieback monitored over 5+ years. Structural integrity and vitality are now significantly compromised. Given its proximity to the dwelling and highway (high target occupancy), retention presents an unacceptable foreseeable risk of failure and liability under duty of care obligations. Felling is therefore justified on arboricultural safety grounds.

    8 May 2026 Trees