Planning application
12 Martingales Close Ham Richmond TW10 7JJ
Works: Trees
Permission granted. Work must normally begin within three years of the decision or the permission lapses.
Proposal
T1 Horse chestnut and Sycamore tree. Thin both trees to improve light into the garden and raise canopy of Horse chestnut up to 5 meters it improve light. T2 Holly. Reduce overall canopy by 3 meters and raise canopy by 3 meters to improve sight lines and to make regular maintenance easier.
As published by the council, reference PA26/1215
Application record
- Reference
- PA26/1215
- Type
- Works to Trees Under TPO
- Status
- Decided
- Decision
- Granted Permission
- Received
- 7 Apr 2026
- Validated
- 7 Apr 2026
- Decided
- 2 Jun 2026
- Ward
- Ham, Petersham & Richmond Riverside Ward [HMP]
- Decision by
- Delegated Decision
- Postcode
- TW10 7JJ
Timeline
Dates from the published record
-
7 Apr 2026
Received by Richmond upon Thames
-
2 Jun 2026
Decision issued: Granted Permission
-
13 Aug 2026
Added to PlanIndex
Documents
Plans, drawings, consultee responses and the officer's report
3 documents on file for this application
A planning file usually holds the application form, drawings and site plans, consultee responses, the officer's report and the decision notice.
Trade members open them from here.
Open the documentsWhat a grant of permission means
The process from here
Permission has been granted, usually subject to conditions listed on the decision notice, some of which must be discharged before work starts. The decision notice on the council portal sets out exactly what was approved.
Work must normally begin within three years of the decision or the permission lapses. Neighbours cannot appeal a grant; challenging one means judicial review of how the decision was made, within tight time limits.
About trees applications
How this application type works
Tree applications cover work to protected trees: those under a tree preservation order need consent for pruning or felling, and trees in a conservation area need six weeks written notice before work starts. The council assesses the amenity value of the tree and can refuse consent, approve it with conditions, or in conservation areas make a preservation order in response.
Nearby applications
Within 500 metres
-
12 Martingales Close Ham Richmond TW10 7JJ
T1. Horse chestnut in the rear garden of number 12 Martingales Close. I am proposing to remove the lefthand co-dominant leader. The condition of the tree is below average. There is heavy ivy growth on the left leader with structural weakness at the co-dominant junction. By removing the lefthand junction any future damage to the neighbouring property will be avoided. The remaining right hand leader I propose to pollard down to approximately 15 metres, reducing the overall canopy by 5 metres.
Refused Trees 3 docs -
12 Martingales Close Ham Richmond TW10 7JJ
T1 Horse chest nut. Carry out a 5 meter reduction down to a finish height of 15 meters
Refused Trees 2 docs -
12 Martingales Close Ham Richmond TW10 7JJ
Ground floor rear extension, front porch, first floor front extension and new roof to existing garage
Granted Householder Extension Roofing 19 docsSmall domestic -
12 Martingales Close Ham Richmond TW10 7JJ
T2 Holly tree. Reduce canopy by 5 meters down to approximately 15 meters With reference to the above application and your request for further justification for the work to T2 Holly Tree. The holly tree has had work carried out to it in the past, approximately 10 years ago. It is very overgrown and unmanageable. My proposal to reduce the canopy by 5 metres would enable future maintenance of the holly tree.
Refused Trees 3 docs -
12 Martingales Close Ham Richmond TW10 7JJ
T1 Sycamore tree. Reduce height by 5 meters down to approximately 15 meters
Refused Trees 3 docs -
9 Martingales Close Ham Richmond TW10 7JJ
Single storey rear extension.
Granted Householder Extension 9 docsSmall domestic
Other trees applications
In Richmond upon Thames
-
PA26/2888 Granted
Palace Gate House, Old Palace Yard, Richmond, TW9 1PD
T1 - Stone Pine Dimensions: Approx 18m Height, N12m, E6m, S8m, W2m. Proposed Works: Remove lowest limb back to the stem. Justification: The tree has a large over-extended lever arm growing to the north-west, roughly 12m in length. It protrudes well outside the line of the rest of the canopy and has been the subject of at least two previous applications, including one rejected by Richmond last year, showing this limb has been a concern to multiple separate arborists over a period of time. Recently a limb above it failed, came down and caused significant damage to the listed boundary wall to Old Palace Yard. The remaining lever arm sits above a busy public footpath with frequent historical tours passing through, a busy roadway and a run of car parking bays. Photographs from only two years ago show a noticeable flattening of the limb since, which adds to our concerns around end loading and mechanical stress at the union. With the failure we have been dealing with, there are no sufficient points left in the tree to brace from. On that basis we believe removal of the limb is the only suitable course of action, and given the target beneath it and the failure that has already occurred and no substantial reduction points.
-
PA26/2902 Awaiting decision
40, Park Road, Hampton Wick, Kingston Upon Thames, KT1 4AS
T1 Silver Birch: Fell Justification: Dead, or at the very least looking a bit shabby.
-
PA26/2251 Decided
95, High Street, Hampton Wick, Kingston Upon Thames, KT1 4DG
T1- Ash tree- Remove and replace with Liquidambar tree. This tree has been a problem for many years. It grows adjacent to a street light on a busy road thus consuming and blocking the light for pedestrians & road users. it drops debris onto the footpath & road. The tree was last trimmed back in November 2023 and has now grown back over the footpath & road. There are branches breaking out and some panic growth visible. Suspicion that Ash dieback is present. The tree is covered in Ivy so the condition of the stem cannot be seen at this stage. The reason for the replanting of a Liquidambar tree is that it would have a nicer look on the road. T2- Small Nespola tree- Remove this tree. It doesn't add any benefit to the property or area and has been left to grow wild.
-
PA26/2893 Awaiting decision
14, Hales Court, Field Lane, Teddington
Rear of Flats T1-Catalpa Crown reduction of whole tree by 2 metres to leave a canopy spread of 4 metres. Remove dead and diseases wood. • T1 Catalpa is located in the rear of the property as shown on the map provided. • The works are part of a regular maintenance program to retain the tree at a suitable size for it’s location. • The tree is encroaching heavily onto the roof of the property. T2-Walnut Crown reduction of whole tree by 2 metres to leave a canopy spread of 4 metres. Remove dead and diseases wood. • T2 Walnut is located in the rear of the property as shown on the map provided. • The works are part of a regular maintenance program to retain the tree at a suitable size for it’s location. • The tree is encroaching heavily onto the neighbouring property..
-
PA26/2897 Awaiting decision
Cardinal House, Hampton Court Road, Hampton, East Molesey, KT8 9BW
G1 - 6x Hornbeam (NW & SW border of the garden) - Reduce crowns back to the pleached tree frameworks. Height to be reduced by 6m, back to 1ft above old framework points, to create a flat top across all trees. Sides reduced by 2m, back to create a pleached frame work, near to previous points as reduced on the NW side. The aim is to bring the trees, back into the pleached pruning method, as initially intended when planted.