Skip to content
PlanIndex Get alerts
Menu

Planning application

72 Stanley Road East Sheen London SW14 7DZ

Refused Richmond upon Thames 24/T0887/TPO Works to Trees Under TPO

Works: Trees

Refused. Only the applicant can appeal, within the statutory time limit, and a revised scheme can be submitted instead.

Proposal

T1 Quercus palustris (Pin Oak): Fell to ground level Reasons: Please see Tree Safety Inspection Report attached

As published by the council, reference 24/T0887/TPO

Application record

Reference
24/T0887/TPO
Type
Works to Trees Under TPO
Status
Decision Issued
Decision
Refused Permission
Received
21 Oct 2024
Validated
21 Oct 2024
Decided
19 Dec 2024
Ward
East Sheen Ward [EST]
Parish
East Sheen Village
Decision by
Delegated Decision
Postcode
SW14 7DZ

Site history

Applications at this address on the Richmond upon Thames register

This site has had 3 applications since 2024: 1 approved, 2 refused.

  • 24/T0691/TPO Refused

    72 Stanley Road East Sheen London SW14 7DZ

    T2 Oak 12m high - Fell Reasons: Although not yet fully grown, has already reached a considerable size. Its continued growth poses significant concerns due to its location and the impact on the property. I wish to outline the key reasons why removal is not only advisable but necessary: 1. Proximity to the Houses and buildings The tree is situated dangerously close to the house. As it continues to grow, the root system will expand further, potentially leading to structural damage to the foundations of the property. Additionally, the proximity increases the risk of falling branches, which could cause significant harm to the property or its occupants, especially during adverse weather conditions. 2. Previous Pruning and Maintenance The trees continued expansion has proven difficult to control. The regular pruning required to keep the tree at bay is not only unsustainable but also diminishes the tree's aesthetic and structural integrity. 3. Impact on the Property The tree casts substantial shadow over the property, significantly reducing natural light within the home. This not only affects the living conditions but could also contribute to dampness and other issues commonly associated with limited sunlight exposure. The tree's overhanging branches also extend over the roof, posing a continuous risk of damage to the roofing structure. 4. Future Growth Potential Given that the tree is not yet fully grown, it is expected to continue expanding both in height and breadth. This will exacerbate all the aforementioned concerns, further endangering the property and its occupants. The tree's removal now, while it is still manageable, is a prudent measure to prevent future complications that may arise from its unchecked growth. 5. Alternative Mitigation Measures While pruning and other maintenance...

    Decided 1 Oct 2024 Trees
  • 24/T0654/TCA Granted

    72 Stanley Road East Sheen London SW14 7DZ

    T1 Macrocarpa 16m high: Reduce the lateral branches only by up to 2m, to leave a finished lateral spread. height and width to remain the same Reason: Routine maintenance 1. Proximity to the Houses and buildings The tree is situated dangerously close to the house. As it continues to grow, the root system will expand further, potentially leading to structural damage to the foundations of the property. Additionally, the proximity increases the risk of falling branches, which could cause significant harm to the property or its occupants, especially during adverse weather conditions. 2. Previous Pruning and Maintenance The trees continued expansion has proven difficult to control. The regular pruning required to keep the tree at bay is not only unsustainable but also diminishes the tree's aesthetic and structural integrity. 3. Impact on the Property The tree casts substantial shadow over the property, significantly reducing natural light within the home. This not only affects the living conditions but could also contribute to dampness and other issues commonly associated with limited sunlight exposure. The tree's overhanging branches also extend over the roof, posing a continuous risk of damage to the roofing structure. 4. Future Growth Potential Given that the tree is not yet fully grown, it is expected to continue expanding both in height and breadth. This will exacerbate all the aforementioned concerns, further endangering the property and its occupants. The tree's removal now, while it is still manageable, is a prudent measure to prevent future complications that may arise from its unchecked growth. 5. Alternative Mitigation Measures While pruning and other maintenance...

    Decided 23 Sep 2024 Trees

Timeline

Dates from the published record

  1. 21 Oct 2024

    Received by Richmond upon Thames

  2. 19 Dec 2024

    Decision issued: Refused Permission

  3. 8 Sep 2026

    Added to PlanIndex

Documents

Plans, drawings, consultee responses and the officer's report

3 documents on file for this application

A planning file usually holds the application form, drawings and site plans, consultee responses, the officer's report and the decision notice.

Trade members open them from here.

Open the documents

What this refusal means

Richmond upon Thames refused this application for the reasons on the decision notice; only the applicant can appeal, and refused schemes often return in revised form. More in our guide to what happens after a planning decision.

About tree works applications

Applications for works to trees cover protected trees: consent under a tree preservation order, or six weeks notice for trees in a conservation area. More in our guide to planning application types.

Nearby applications

Within 500 metres

  • 72 Stanley Road East Sheen London SW14 7DZ

    24/T0691/TPO Submitted 19 Aug 2024 24m away

    T2 Oak 12m high - Fell Reasons: Although not yet fully grown, has already reached a considerable size. Its continued growth poses significant concerns due to its location and the impact on the property. I wish to outline the key reasons why removal is not only advisable but necessary: 1. Proximity to the Houses and buildings The tree is situated dangerously close to the house. As it continues to grow, the root system will expand further, potentially leading to structural damage to the foundations of the property. Additionally, the proximity increases the risk of falling branches, which could cause significant harm to the property or its occupants, especially during adverse weather conditions. 2. Previous Pruning and Maintenance The trees continued expansion has proven difficult to control. The regular pruning required to keep the tree at bay is not only unsustainable but also diminishes the tree's aesthetic and structural integrity. 3. Impact on the Property The tree casts substantial shadow over the property, significantly reducing natural light within the home. This not only affects the living conditions but could also contribute to dampness and other issues commonly associated with limited sunlight exposure. The tree's overhanging branches also extend over the roof, posing a continuous risk of damage to the roofing structure. 4. Future Growth Potential Given that the tree is not yet fully grown, it is expected to continue expanding both in height and breadth. This will exacerbate all the aforementioned concerns, further endangering the property and its occupants. The tree's removal now, while it is still manageable, is a prudent measure to prevent future complications that may arise from its unchecked growth. 5. Alternative Mitigation Measures While pruning and other maintenance...

    Refused Trees 1 doc
  • 72 Stanley Road East Sheen London SW14 7DZ

    24/T0654/TCA Submitted 19 Aug 2024 24m away

    T1 Macrocarpa 16m high: Reduce the lateral branches only by up to 2m, to leave a finished lateral spread. height and width to remain the same Reason: Routine maintenance 1. Proximity to the Houses and buildings The tree is situated dangerously close to the house. As it continues to grow, the root system will expand further, potentially leading to structural damage to the foundations of the property. Additionally, the proximity increases the risk of falling branches, which could cause significant harm to the property or its occupants, especially during adverse weather conditions. 2. Previous Pruning and Maintenance The trees continued expansion has proven difficult to control. The regular pruning required to keep the tree at bay is not only unsustainable but also diminishes the tree's aesthetic and structural integrity. 3. Impact on the Property The tree casts substantial shadow over the property, significantly reducing natural light within the home. This not only affects the living conditions but could also contribute to dampness and other issues commonly associated with limited sunlight exposure. The tree's overhanging branches also extend over the roof, posing a continuous risk of damage to the roofing structure. 4. Future Growth Potential Given that the tree is not yet fully grown, it is expected to continue expanding both in height and breadth. This will exacerbate all the aforementioned concerns, further endangering the property and its occupants. The tree's removal now, while it is still manageable, is a prudent measure to prevent future complications that may arise from its unchecked growth. 5. Alternative Mitigation Measures While pruning and other maintenance...

    Granted Trees 5 docs
  • 64 Stanley Road East Sheen Richmond Upon Thames SW14 7DZ

    06/0283/HOT Submitted 24 Jan 2006 38m away

    Proposed change of garage to habitable rooms and ground floor rear extension.

    Granted Householder Extension 7 docs
    Domestic
  • 16, Berwyn Road, Richmond, TW10 5BS

    PA26/1380 Submitted 21 Apr 2026 55m away

    Single storey, ground floor rear extension with associated painted timber French doors and painted timber casement windows in the rear façade. Two double glazed lantern rooflights set within the new flat roof over the proposed extension.

    Granted Householder Extension Loft or dormer +1 26 docs
    Small domestic
  • Furness Lodge Derby Road East Sheen Richmond Upon Thames SW14 7DY

    04/4111/FUL Submitted 17 Dec 2004 71m away

    Rebuild section of boundary wall. Level changes and resurfacing of car park.

    Granted Full applications
    Small domestic
  • 44 Stanley Road East Sheen Richmond Upon Thames SW14 7DZ

    05/3278/PS192 Submitted 1 Nov 2005 81m away

    Alterations and extension to existing residential property.

    Granted Prior approval Extension 7 docs

In Richmond upon Thames

  • PA26/3083 Decided

    Fulwell Golf Club, Wellington Road, Hampton, TW12 1JY

    5 DAY DANGEROUS TREE NOTICE - Oak Tree on the golf course. The reason for the emergency, is that A huge huge limb came down and the rest of the oak is seriously in danger of snapping

    4 Sep 2026 Trees
  • PA26/3054 Decided

    STREET RECORD, Langdon Park, Teddington

    5 DAY DANGEROUS TREE NOTICE T5 - Larch - Fell T6 - Sycamore - Fell

    2 Sep 2026 Trees
  • PA26/3037 Awaiting decision

    22 Chalmers Way Twickenham Middlesex TW1 1QG

    T1 – Cedar Remove major deadwood (=25mm diameter). Prune back from property to provide a minimum 3m clearance. Final height: unchanged. Final spread: unchanged.

    2 Sep 2026 Trees
  • PA26/3022 Awaiting decision

    11, Aquarius, Eel Pie Island, Twickenham, TW1 3EA

    Back Garden (Left Boundary) T1: Judas tree – Reduce height by 0.5m - 1m through selective thinning, remove major deadwood Height of tree currently: 4m Height of tree after reduction: 3.5m Spread of tree currently: 4m Spread of tree after reduction: 3.5m Back Garden (Right Boundary) T2: Rowan tree – Reduce height by 1m, reduce sides by 0.5m, lift canopy by 0.5m, remove major deadwood Height of tree currently: 4m Height of tree after reduction: 3m Spread of tree currently: 2m Spread of tree after reduction: 1.5m Reasons for work: General tree maintenance Trees in decline Maintaining tree in its current setting

    1 Sep 2026 Trees
  • PA26/3021 Awaiting decision

    Aquarius, Eel Pie Island, Twickenham

    Grounds of Aquarius T1: Cherry tree (located outside property #4) – Reduce by 0.5m back to previous points Height of tree currently: 4m Height of tree after reduction: 3.5m Spread of tree currently: 3m Spread of tree after reduction: 2.5m T3/A/B/C/D: Hornbeam trees (x4 by footpath) – Reduce height by 2.5m through selective thinning reduce lateral growth by 1.5m through selective thinning Height of tree currently: 11m Height of tree after reduction: 8.5m Spread of tree currently: 7m Spread of tree after reduction: 5.5m T5: Silver birch tree (located outside property #12) – Reduce height by 2m, reduce sides by 0.5m to balance, remove major deadwood Height of tree currently: 11m Height of tree after reduction: 8.5m Spread of tree currently: 7m Spread of tree after reduction: 6.5m T6: Sycamore tree (outside property #13) – Reduce by 1m back to previous points, remove ivy down to fence level Height of tree currently: 11m Height of tree after reduction: 10m Spread of tree currently: 6m Spread of tree after reduction: 5m T7: Sycamore tree (outside property #14) – Thin canopy by 15%, remove major deadwood Height of tree currently: 11m Height of tree after reduction: 11m Spread of tree currently: 6m Spread of tree after reduction: 6m T8: A/B/C Sycamore trees (x3 outside properties #7 and #8) – reduce lateral growth towards the building back by 1.5m, remove ivy up to the bottom of the gutter only Height of tree currently: 10m Height of tree after reduction: 10m Spread of tree currently: 6m Spread of tree after reduction: 4m T9: Fig Tree - Reduce height by 1.5m, reduce sides by 1.5m Height of tree currently: 4m Height of tree after reduction: 2.5m Spread of tree currently: 4m Spread of tree after reduction: 2.5m Reason for Tree Works: General tree maintenance carried out across the grounds of Aquarius as part of the regular 3-year maintenance cycle. This includes crown reductions, crown lifting over footpaths with heavy pedestrian use, particularly routes providing access to the offices and clubs located on Eel Pie Island, and providing suitable clearance from buildings.

    1 Sep 2026 Trees