Skip to content
PlanIndex Get alerts
Menu

Planning application

15 Montpelier Row Twickenham Richmond Upon Thames TW1 2NQ

Refused Richmond upon Thames 05/T0377/TPO Works to Trees Under TPO

Works: Trees

Refused. Only the applicant can appeal, within the statutory time limit, and a revised scheme can be submitted instead.

Proposal

T1 - Lime (Tilia europaea) - Cutting back to previous points (1999)

As published by the council, reference 05/T0377/TPO

Application record

Reference
05/T0377/TPO
Type
Works to Trees Under TPO
Status
Refused Permission
Decision
Refused
Received
12 May 2005
Validated
12 May 2005
Decided
3 Jun 2005
Ward
TWICKENHAM RIVERSIDE WARD
Decision by
Delegated Decision
Postcode
TW1 2NQ

Timeline

Dates from the published record

  1. 12 May 2005

    Received by Richmond upon Thames

  2. 3 Jun 2005

    Decision issued: Refused

  3. 23 Aug 2026

    Added to PlanIndex

What refusal means

The process from here

The council refused this application for the reasons set out on the decision notice, which the council portal holds in full. Only the applicant can appeal a refusal; the time limit runs from the decision date and is shorter for householder schemes.

Refusal does not prevent a fresh attempt. Applicants often address the reasons for refusal and resubmit, so a refused scheme is not necessarily the end of proposals for the site.

About trees applications

How this application type works

Tree applications cover work to protected trees: those under a tree preservation order need consent for pruning or felling, and trees in a conservation area need six weeks written notice before work starts. The council assesses the amenity value of the tree and can refuse consent, approve it with conditions, or in conservation areas make a preservation order in response.

More on trees applications in our guide

Nearby applications

Within 500 metres

In Richmond upon Thames

  • PA26/2888 Granted

    Palace Gate House, Old Palace Yard, Richmond, TW9 1PD

    T1 - Stone Pine Dimensions: Approx 18m Height, N12m, E6m, S8m, W2m. Proposed Works: Remove lowest limb back to the stem. Justification: The tree has a large over-extended lever arm growing to the north-west, roughly 12m in length. It protrudes well outside the line of the rest of the canopy and has been the subject of at least two previous applications, including one rejected by Richmond last year, showing this limb has been a concern to multiple separate arborists over a period of time. Recently a limb above it failed, came down and caused significant damage to the listed boundary wall to Old Palace Yard. The remaining lever arm sits above a busy public footpath with frequent historical tours passing through, a busy roadway and a run of car parking bays. Photographs from only two years ago show a noticeable flattening of the limb since, which adds to our concerns around end loading and mechanical stress at the union. With the failure we have been dealing with, there are no sufficient points left in the tree to brace from. On that basis we believe removal of the limb is the only suitable course of action, and given the target beneath it and the failure that has already occurred and no substantial reduction points.

    19 Aug 2026 Trees
  • PA26/2902 Awaiting decision

    40, Park Road, Hampton Wick, Kingston Upon Thames, KT1 4AS

    T1 Silver Birch: Fell Justification: Dead, or at the very least looking a bit shabby.

    21 Aug 2026 Trees
  • PA26/2251 Decided

    95, High Street, Hampton Wick, Kingston Upon Thames, KT1 4DG

    T1- Ash tree- Remove and replace with Liquidambar tree. This tree has been a problem for many years. It grows adjacent to a street light on a busy road thus consuming and blocking the light for pedestrians & road users. it drops debris onto the footpath & road. The tree was last trimmed back in November 2023 and has now grown back over the footpath & road. There are branches breaking out and some panic growth visible. Suspicion that Ash dieback is present. The tree is covered in Ivy so the condition of the stem cannot be seen at this stage. The reason for the replanting of a Liquidambar tree is that it would have a nicer look on the road. T2- Small Nespola tree- Remove this tree. It doesn't add any benefit to the property or area and has been left to grow wild.

    29 Jun 2026 Trees
  • PA26/2893 Awaiting decision

    14, Hales Court, Field Lane, Teddington

    Rear of Flats T1-Catalpa Crown reduction of whole tree by 2 metres to leave a canopy spread of 4 metres. Remove dead and diseases wood. • T1 Catalpa is located in the rear of the property as shown on the map provided. • The works are part of a regular maintenance program to retain the tree at a suitable size for it’s location. • The tree is encroaching heavily onto the roof of the property. T2-Walnut Crown reduction of whole tree by 2 metres to leave a canopy spread of 4 metres. Remove dead and diseases wood. • T2 Walnut is located in the rear of the property as shown on the map provided. • The works are part of a regular maintenance program to retain the tree at a suitable size for it’s location. • The tree is encroaching heavily onto the neighbouring property..

    20 Aug 2026 Trees
  • PA26/2897 Awaiting decision

    Cardinal House, Hampton Court Road, Hampton, East Molesey, KT8 9BW

    G1 - 6x Hornbeam (NW & SW border of the garden) - Reduce crowns back to the pleached tree frameworks. Height to be reduced by 6m, back to 1ft above old framework points, to create a flat top across all trees. Sides reduced by 2m, back to create a pleached frame work, near to previous points as reduced on the NW side. The aim is to bring the trees, back into the pleached pruning method, as initially intended when planted.

    20 Aug 2026 Trees