Planning application
30 Clarence Walk Redhill Surrey RH1 6NE
Works: Loft or dormer Windows or glazing Small domestic
Read from the description, not a valuation. How we read the register
Still open. Anyone can comment while the consultation period runs, and comments go to the council rather than to us.
Proposal
Non Material Amendment. Reduce single storey rear extent by 1150mm, move second storey element to phase 2, new small front facing rooflight and change of rear fenestration.
As published by the council, reference 26/00886/NMAMD1
Application record
- Reference
- 26/00886/NMAMD1
- Status
- Registered
- Validated
- 1 Sep 2026
- Ward
- Meadvale And St Johns
- Decision by
- Neighbourhood Development Manager
- Postcode
- RH1 6NE
Timeline
Dates from the published record
-
1 Sep 2026
Validated
Checked as complete and ready for consideration.
-
3 Sep 2026
Added to PlanIndex
-
Decision
Awaiting decision
Decision expected by 27 October 2026, 8 weeks from validation under the statutory target for most applications. Extensions of time are common and are agreed case by case.
Reigate and Banstead took a median of 56 days over the applications it decided in the last year.
Who's behind it
Company information only, from the register and Companies House
Agent on file, an architecture practice
26 applications on PlanIndex · across 14 councils
Trade members see who it is, their full track record, and every application they have filed.
See who's behind itWhat happens while it is decided
The process from here
This application is with Reigate and Banstead for determination. The council publicises it, consults neighbours and technical bodies where required, and weighs the responses against local and national planning policy.
The statutory target is eight weeks for most applications and thirteen for major development, though extensions of time are common. Comments carry most weight while the case is undecided, so check the council portal for the deadline if you want to respond.
About this record
Reading the register
This page mirrors an entry on the statutory planning register that Reigate and Banstead is required to keep. The published feed for this record does not state which type of application it is, which is common for older entries and for some council systems; the register entry on the council portal will say, alongside the case officer and any consultation dates.
Every planning application follows the same broad path: submission, validation, publicity, then a decision by officers or committee. Our guide to planning application types explains the common types and what each can approve.
Nearby applications
Within 500 metres
-
30 Clarence Walk Redhill Surrey RH1 6NE
90% historically approved · decision due ~24 Jul
Demolition of existing single storey rear outrigger and replacement with part-one, part-two storey rear extension. As amended on 29/07/2026.
Decided Extension DemolitionSmall domestic -
66 Clarence Walk Redhill Surrey RH1 6NE
Single storey rear extension. Max height 2.70, height eaves 2.70 and 6.00 extending beyond the rear wall.
Granted Prior approval Extension 7 docsSmall domestic -
66 Clarence Walk Redhill Surrey RH1 6NE
Single storey front extension.
Refused Householder Extension 10 docsSmall domestic -
58 Clarence Walk Redhill Surrey RH1 6NE
T1 Ash- Prune the two lateral limbs growing towards 58 Clarence Walk by 3m back to suitable growth points. Crown lift to height of 4m. Tree has had work carried out on one side and has now become unbalanced. Pruning works would rebalance tree and maintain more natural shape. Limbs and low branches are now causing excessive shading to out building.
Granted Trees 2 docs -
12 The Fairways Redhill Surrey RH1 6LP
Single storey rear extension with a flat roof.
Granted Householder Extension 11 docsSmall domestic -
6 The Fairways Redhill Surrey RH1 6LP
T1 Cypress Fell to ground level due to multiple fungal fruiting bodies at base believed to be ganoderma causing heartwood decay. Tree has significant lean towards neighbouring property and gardens. A recent reduction on a neighbouring tree has made this worse. Also there is a significant old wound/area of decay on the back side of the stem that is around 4 metres in length. Applicant will replace tree with a sapling. Reduction would leave the tree looking unsightly and therefore remove the amenity value in the interest of safety tree to be removed.
Granted Trees 6 docs