Planning application
3 Elm Bank Drive Nottingham Nottingham City NG3 5AL
Works: Trees
Permission granted. Work must normally begin within three years of the decision or the permission lapses.
Proposal
There is a large evergreen tree (holly tree) on the boundary between the back of our house and Burnham House on 6 Elm Bank, Nottingham NG3 5AJ. It is not subject to a TPO. The neighbours had the tree reduced in height some time ago, but since then, the branches of the tree have grown considerably and cross the boundary line by 1 metre or more. I would like to prune the overhanging branches back to the boundary line. The neighbours have been informed of my intentions.
As published by the council, reference 26/01367/PWC
Application record
- Reference
- 26/01367/PWC
- Status
- Decided
- Decision
- Granted As published: No objection
- Received
- 3 Aug 2026
- Validated
- 3 Aug 2026
- Decided
- 10 Sep 2026
- Ward
- Mapperley (May 2019)
- Postcode
- NG3 5AL
Timeline
Dates from the published record
-
3 Aug 2026
Received by Nottingham
-
21 Aug 2026
Added to PlanIndex
-
10 Sep 2026
Decision issued: No objection
-
10 Sep 2026
Status changed to Decided
Previously Pending Consideration.
Documents
Plans, drawings, consultee responses and the officer's report
6 documents on file for this application
- TREE IMAGE 1
- TREE IMAGE 2
- TREE IMAGE 3
- TREE IMAGE 4
- APPLICATION FORM - WITHOUT PERSONAL DATA
- TREE LOCATION ON MAP
Watch members (£5 a month) open the document list from here.
Open the documentsWhat this grant of permission means
Nottingham granted permission on 10 September 2026, subject to any conditions on the decision notice. Work must normally begin within three years or the permission lapses. More in our guide to what happens after a planning decision.
About this record
The published feed does not state which type of application this is; the register entry on Nottingham's portal will say. Our guide explains the common types.
Nearby applications
Within 0.3 miles
-
30A Elm Bank Drive Nottingham NG3 5AL
94% historically approved · decision due ~6 Nov
Tree Works Summary - 30A Elmbank Drive Full arboricultural inspection reports, photographs and survey notes are available online through the planning application. Tree Ref Species Works Required Reason T01436 Sycamore (Acer pseudoplatanus) Reduce lateral canopy by up to 1.5m, crown lift to 5m, remove deadwood over 20mm Canopy affecting adjoining property and presence of minor deadwood. T01437 Sycamore (Acer pseudoplatanus) Pollard to 1m above main union Historical pollard with signs of fibre buckling, wetwood and Sooty Bark Disease. Overhangs adjoining property. T01438 Sycamore (Acer pseudoplatanus) Re-coppice to stool Poor condition, independent stem movement indicating instability, prominent Sooty Bark Disease and evidence of limb failure. T01439 Sycamore (Acer pseudoplatanus) Reduce lateral canopy by up to 1.5m, remove two lowest limbs over adjoining property, crown lift to 5m, remove deadwood over 20mm Canopy encroachment over neighbouring property and presence of deadwood. T01440 Black Poplar (Populus nigra) Aerial inspection of decay pockets, remove defective structural limb (retaining 2m stub), reduce lateral canopy by up to 1.5m, remove deadwood over 20mm Signs of decay, structural weakness, previous pruning defects and risk of limb failure over access drive and neighbouring property. Note: The recommended works are primarily intended to manage structural defects, reduce the risk of branch or stem failure, address disease-related concerns, and maintain clearance from neighbouring property. Full details are available within the submitted tree survey and inspection reports on the planning application website.
Awaiting decision Trees 4 docs -
30A Elm Bank Drive Nottingham Nottingham City NG3 5AL
94% historically approved · decision due ~30 Oct
TPO350: Sycamore (T1-T4) Large mature sycamores within a confined residential setting. Lower branches are encroaching into neighbouring gardens and towards nearby buildings. The proposed works involve lifting and selectively reducing the lowest branches to provide reasonable clearance from boundaries and structures. Works will be carried out using target pruning to suitable growth points, retaining the trees' natural form, amenity value and overall crown structure. The works are considered proportionate and appropriate to manage encroachment, improve the relationship between the trees and surrounding properties, and reduce the need for more extensive pruning in the future. T1: Remove the two lowest encroaching branches back to the main stem. T2 & T3: Remove the two lowest encroaching branches back to the main stem and reduce the next three branches by approximately 2 to 3 metres using target pruning. T4: Remove the four lowest encroaching branches back to the main stem and reduce the next three branches by approximately 2 to 3 metres using target pruning. T5 Ash (self-set): Reduce branches as necessary to provide 3 metres clearance from the building and roofline using target pruning.
Awaiting decision Trees -
Elm House 32 Elm Bank Drive Nottingham Nottingham City NG3 5AL
There are 2 trees that require works - a Taxus (yew tree) and a IIex (holly tree). Both trees require crown lift to provide 3m clearance for pedestrians on public payment and to provide more light into the garden. Also need to relieve pressure of limb from a retaining wall. Crown thinning (10-20%), and prune to clear phone.
Granted Trees 7 docs -
30A Elm Bank Drive Nottingham NG3 5AL
The two trees are Sycamores, numberd 6 and 8 on the attached diagram. We are looking to fell them for the following reasons: 1) The presence of these trees is affected the quality of life for people living in the neighbouring flats, as the trees not only block most light into their living areas in the summer. The bottom floor flats are approximately 3-4m below ground level of the trees, for example, and this makes living there gloomy for several months of the year. In addition, the amount of honeydew from this particular species of tree makes their back gardens black and very difficult to clean, as does the amount of leaves that fall in the autumn, which all collect in their gardens as there isn't anywhere for them to blow away 2) We have 4 identical sycamore trees or similar height, all in a row (numbered 4, 6, 8 and 9). The canopies all touch when in full bloom, so we feel that removing 6 and 8 will have a minimal effect on the visual appearance of the canopy when viewed from a distance, given that the trees are so closely located together. 3) We ideally would like to create a 'wild' area in that part of the garden, to attract butterflies, bees and other wildlife as well as a vegetable patch for the children, but the extreme shade caused by these two trees makes this challenging.
Refused Trees 2 docs -
30 Elm Bank Drive Nottingham Nottingham City NG3 5AL
Large Copper Beech Tree (Tree 1) on front of No30. Blocking a large amount of light to property and a poorly lit street, request a sympathetic canopy thin (20%) of small diameter branches. Branch causing pressure on phone line to customers house, remove of branch to prevent future problems. Minor deadwood removal from top of canopy (exempt works). Large Leylandii (Tree 2) on neighbouring property requested to be removed to ground due to complaints on both sides. (Destroying lawn on customers side and overhanging heavily on the other.)
Granted Trees 6 docs -
2A Elm Bank Drive Nottingham NG3 5AL
Large HMO (sui generis) for up to 10 residents
Granted Lawful development 2 docs