Planning application
231, Archway Road, London, N6 5BS
Works: Trees
Permission granted. Work must normally begin within three years of the decision or the permission lapses.
Proposal
T2: Willow (6m): Re-pollard to previous points to keep tree at a size suitable for its location: taking off about 1.5m of re-growth back to the previous pollard points.
As published by the council, reference CON/2021/0324
Application record
- Reference
- CON/2021/0324
- Type
- Works to trees in Conservation Area
- Status
- Decision Made
- Decision
- Granted As published: No Objection
- Received
- 12 Jul 2021
- Validated
- 12 Jul 2021
- Decision by
- Delegated Decision
- Postcode
- N6 5BS
Timeline
Dates from the published record
-
12 Jul 2021
Received by Haringey
-
4 Oct 2026
Added to PlanIndex
Documents
Plans, drawings, consultee responses and the officer's report
6 documents on file for this application
A planning file usually holds the application form, drawings and site plans, consultee responses, the officer's report and the decision notice.
Watch members (£5 a month) open the document list from here.
Open the documentsWhat this grant of permission means
Haringey granted permission, subject to any conditions on the decision notice. Work must normally begin within three years or the permission lapses. More in our guide to what happens after a planning decision.
About tree works applications
Applications for works to trees cover protected trees: consent under a tree preservation order, or six weeks notice for trees in a conservation area. More in our guide to planning application types.
Nearby applications
Within 0.3 miles
-
Flat 1, 239 Archway Road, Hornsey, London, N6 5BS
Single storey infill rear extension
Refused Full applications Extension 13 docsSmall domestic -
Land to the rear of 235 , Archway Road, London, N6 5BS
I seek consent to remove one mature cherry tree situated on a narrow stretch of land to the rear of a Garage on Southwood Avenue. The tree has reached a size that is no longer appropriate for its location and is causing ongoing damage to surrounding structures and the safe use of the property. The root system has caused damage to the boundary wall adjoining 235 Archway Road. This wall is not merely a boundary feature but also functions as a retaining wall supporting a significant volume of soil. The continued expansion of the root system is placing increasing pressure on the wall, resulting in structural deterioration and creating concern that further damage will occur if the tree is retained. In addition to the damage caused by its roots, the tree has developed a pronounced lean towards the neighbouring property at 235 Archway Road. The lean is such that the neighbouring owners have altered the alignment of their boundary fence to accommodate the tree trunk. This demonstrates the extent to which the tree has outgrown its location and illustrates the impact it is having on neighbouring land. The root system has also produced numerous exposed surface roots extending across the garden. These roots create uneven ground, impede safe access to parts of the property, and make routine maintenance increasingly difficult. The issues described above are inherent to the tree's size, maturity and root development rather than being temporary or capable of being resolved through routine pruning. Crown reduction or other pruning operations would not address the structural damage being caused below ground or the continuing pressure exerted on the retaining wall by the expanding root system. For these reasons, removal of the tree is considered to be the most appropriate long-term solution to prevent further structural damage, reduce the risk of future failure of the retaining wall, improve safe access within the property, and avoid continued encroachment towards the neighbouring property. The proposal relates to a single tree only. If the Council considers replacement planting appropriate, I would be willing to plant a smaller ornamental tree in a more suitable location within the garden, thereby maintaining the contribution to local amenity while avoiding a recurrence of the existing problems.
Decided Trees 10 docsSmall domestic -
225 Archway Road, Hornsey, London, N6 5BS
83% historically approved · decision due ~10 Jul
The construction of a new 3 bedroom property to the rear of 225 Archway Road.
Awaiting decision Full applications 74 docs -
3, Highgate Avenue, London, N6 5RX
Demolition of rear conservatory and external store and erection of a rear extension at ground floor level with basement level internal refurbishment.
Granted Full applications Extension Demolition 13 docs -
1, Highgate Avenue, London, N6 5RX
Demolition of existing rear outbuildings and construction of glazed rear extension, and insertion of new glazing to side elevation.
Granted Full applications Extension Demolition +1 14 docs -
Flat C, 290, Archway Road, London, N6 5AU
Retrospective application for the retention of the existing rear dormer (Class use C3)
Refused Full applications Loft or dormer 53 docs
Other tree works applications
In Haringey
-
HGY/2026/2783 Granted
26 Palace Road, Hornsey, London, N8 8QJ
Five Day Notice. The Horse Chestnut at 26 Palace Road N8 8QJ - dead and losing branches - remove.
-
HGY/2026/2786 Awaiting decision
80C St James's Lane, Hornsey, London, N10 3RD
Rear Garden: T1: Mature Lime: Approximately 13.00m: Growing between No.53 The Chine and The corner of No.80c St.James Lane. Reduce back to previous and most recent points of reduction, approximately 1.50m-1.70m all round. Raise crown over the boundary fences to clear. Ensure a minimum of 2.00m clearance of the building. Remove major dead wood. Thin crown density by approximately 20%. General maintenance/Control encroachment.
-
HGY/2026/2772 Awaiting decision
Grove Works, St Anns Road, Tottenham, London, N15 5RP
Dawn Redwood. Tree T1 on Sketch Plan. Arboriculturist Conclusion "Given the presence of cracks in the wall of adjacent buildings, and the close proximity of the tree to the buildings, it is recommended that T1 is removed to ground level." Engineer's Conclusion "the best course of action to avoid any further movement on the existing building would be to remove the existing tree and underpin the existing foundation"
-
HGY/2026/2780 Awaiting decision
26 Claremont Road, Hornsey, London, N6 5BY
1) Eucalyptus in rear garden: Reduce overall crown by up to 3 metres back to previous reduction framework.
-
HGY/2026/2127 Granted
Pembury House Nursery, Lansdowne Road, Tottenham, London, N17 9XE
Ginkgo (T1) - fell. Reason: this is a female tree, that drops fruit all over the nursery playground. The children try to eat them, it gets into their clothes, shoes, hands, and all over the class room, creating an extremely unpleasant environment for the children and staff. Replant with another deciduous tree with similar potential size canopy (eg. Norway maple) Sycamore (T2) - Reduce the height of the tree by 4m. Reduce lateral branches in line with this (up to 2.5m). Reason: There is some decay at the base of the tree on the east side, spanning 40% of the circumference of the tree. The bark is flaking from ground level up to 1.5m, and use of the sounding mallet indicates the dysfunctional wood extends at least to the same height. The tree has a full crown, but has had selective branch length reductions in the past. The crown overhangs the nursery playground and neighbouring parking area. Lime x2 (T10 & T11) - Crown raise to 4m, removing epicormic growth. Reason: to remove the branches that touch the shelter to prevent damage.