Planning application
Street Record Henry Fowler Drive Wolverhampton West Midlands
Works: Trees
Part of this application was approved and part refused. The decision notice on the council portal sets out which is which.
Proposal
Please see survey for pruning of t573 We also wish to remove the epicormic growth of T586 up to 4m (lime)
As published by the council, reference 26/00389/TR
Application record
- Reference
- 26/00389/TR
- Type
- Lop, Top or Fell Trees Subject to a TPO
- Status
- Decided
- Decision
- Part approved, part refused As published: Split Decision
- Received
- 16 Apr 2026
- Validated
- 28 Apr 2026
- Decided
- 13 May 2026
- Ward
- Tettenhall Regis
- Decision by
- Delegated Decision
Timeline
Dates from the published record
-
16 Apr 2026
Received by Wolverhampton
-
28 Apr 2026
Validated
Checked as complete and ready for consideration.
-
13 May 2026
Decision issued: Split Decision
-
24 Aug 2026
Added to PlanIndex
Who's behind it
Company information only, from the register and Companies House
Agent on file, registered in Wolverhampton
8 applications on PlanIndex · across 2 councils
Trade members see who it is, their full track record, and every application they have filed.
See who's behind itDocuments
Plans, drawings, consultee responses and the officer's report
3 documents on file for this application
A planning file usually holds the application form, drawings and site plans, consultee responses, the officer's report and the decision notice.
Trade members open them from here.
Open the documentsAfter the decision
Wolverhampton has decided this application; the outcome above is the register's own wording and the decision notice on the council portal carries the detail. More in our guide to what happens after a planning decision.
About tree works applications
Applications for works to trees cover protected trees: consent under a tree preservation order, or six weeks notice for trees in a conservation area. More in our guide to planning application types.
Other tree works applications
In Wolverhampton
-
26/00898/TR Decided
569 Stafford Road Wolverhampton West Midlands WV10 6QE
Beech (T1) Whole crown reduction by 2m up to a maximum branch thickness of 25mm, trimming back to leave 3m clearance to domestic dwelling Removal of all dead wood
-
26/00899/TR Awaiting decision
24 Henry Fowler Drive Wolverhampton West Midlands WV6 8TL
Hornbeam 1 (H1) Reduce the overall crown by approximately 50%, comprising a reduction of up to 4 metres in height and up to 5 metres from the lateral crown spread. Prune back branches extending towards or over neighbouring properties to provide up to approximately 1 metre clearance from the property boundaries, including if this requires a lateral reduction greater than 5 metres. Retain a balanced form where possible given the tree's existing irregular/misgrown form. Remove epicormic growth from the base and lower stems up to approximately 2 metres above ground level. Hornbeam 2 (H2) Remove epicormic growth from the base and lower stem up to approximately 2.5 metres above ground level. Prune back branches on the garage side to provide approximately 1 metre clearance from the building, maintaining the overall form of the tree.
-
26/00890/TR Decided
8 Church Hill Road Wolverhampton West Midlands WV6 9AT
Oak Tree - Reduce crown over boundary by up to 2m. The tree is blocking light into the residents garden and is also dropping leaves and branches onto their lawn. The customer has spent a substantial amount of money on landscaping their garden and they would like to keep it in the best possible condition. They also just want to make sure that the tree does not become a nuisance or danger in the future. They like the tree but just down want it to become a nuisance to them.
-
26/00863/TR Awaiting decision
Flat 2 Grafton Court 142 - 144 Tettenhall Road Wolverhampton West Midlands WV6 0BD
Tree T1 - Western Red Cedar - Selective pruning of lower branches to clear the tiled roof.
-
26/00864/TR Decided
10 The Oaks Merridale Road Wolverhampton West Midlands WV3 9RZ
Tree T18 - Yew, crown reduction by no more than 1.2m to suitable growth points to keep canopy away from the building, supporting image shows highlighted level of reduction.