260026

1. 6 Jan 2026

   Received by Wokingham

2. 24 Feb 2026

   Decision issued: Approve

3. 25 Jul 2026

   Added to PlanIndex

Permission has been granted, usually subject to conditions listed on the decision notice, some of which must be discharged before work starts. The decision notice on the council portal sets out exactly what was approved.

Work must normally begin within three years of the decision or the permission lapses. Neighbours cannot appeal a grant; challenging one means judicial review of how the decision was made, within tight time limits.

This page mirrors an entry on the statutory planning register that Wokingham is required to keep. The published feed for this record does not state which type of application it is, which is common for older entries and for some council systems; the register entry on the council portal will say, alongside the case officer and any consultation dates.

Every planning application follows the same broad path: submission, validation, publicity, then a decision by officers or committee. Our guide to planning application types explains the common types and what each can approve.

• 260951 Granted

  Ostland Dunt Avenue Hurst Wokingham RG10 0SY

  Application to remove condition 2 of planning consent 50/62 for the proposed erection of a dwellinghouse. Condition 2 refers to limiting occupancy to a person employed or last employed locally in agriculture for a period of more than 10 years.

  19 Apr 2026 350m away
• 251276 At appeal

  The Furze Workshops Dunt Avenue Hurst Wokingham RG10 0SY

  Breach alleged without planning permission, the material change of use of land and building to a vehicle storage (including caravans) and sales business. Linked appeals 251273 & 250109.

  29 May 2025 350m away Amendments
• 251273 At appeal

  Land to the rear of The Furze Dunt Avenue Hurst Wokingham RG10 0SY

  Breach alleged without planning permission, the material change of use of land and building to a vehicle storage (including caravans) and sales business. Linked appeals 250109 & 251276. (a) It appears to the Council that the above breach of planning control has occurred within the last 10 years. (b) The use of the land and building as a vehicle storage (including caravans) and sales business constitutes an unacceptable and unsustainable form of development in an unsustainable location which fails to maintain the quality of the environment and is detrimental to the character and appearance of the countryside and amenity of the area. The development comprises incongruous features within the countryside setting and is harmful to the undeveloped character and amenity of the wider area. It is contrary to Core Strategy policies CP1, CP3 & CP11 (2010), MDD Local Plan Policies CC01 & CC02 (2014), The National Planning Policy Framework (2024), and the advice and guidance contained in the Borough Design Guide (2012). (c) The introduction of a sales and storage business in this remote, rural location, for which there is inadequate justification, has harmful urbanising effect in this countryside location. The encroachment away from the original buildings and large expanse of outdoor vehicle storage and parking represents inappropriate development in the countryside. This is contrary to the National Planning Policy Framework (2024), Policies CP1, CP3 and CP11 of the Core Strategy (2010). Policies CC02, CC03 & TB21 of the Managing Development Delivery Local Plan (2014) and the advice and guidance contained in the Borough Design Guide (2012). (d) The Land is located within Flood Zone 3 and comprises a significant area of hardstanding and outdoor storage. The unauthorised development results in the displacement of water to surrounding areas, with the consequential potential for an increase in flood risk in and around the site for which a sequential test, exception test or a flood risk assessment have not been provided to justify the development. This conflicts the National Planning Policy Framework, Policy CP1 of the Core Strategy, and Policies CC09 and CC10 of the Managing Development Local Plan. (e) Planning permission should not be given because planning conditions could not overcome these objections and planning permission 250109 has been refused on this basis. (f) To remedy the breach of planning control. The appellant has appealed against the notice on the following grounds: (b) That the breach of control alleged in the enforcement notice has not occurred as a matter of fact. (f) The steps required to comply with the requirements of the notice are excessive, and lesser steps would overcome the objections. (g) The time given to comply with the notice is too short.

  28 May 2025 350m away Conditions
• 260175 Granted

  Ostland Dunt Avenue Hurst Wokingham RG10 0SY

  Application for a certificate of existing lawful development for the occupation of the dwelling without compliance with Condition 2 of planning permission 50/62 granted on 14th June 1962.

  24 Jan 2026 350m away
• 261216 Awaiting decision

  Elmlands Little Hill Road Hurst Wokingham RG10 0TG

  Full application for the proposed change of use of part of the existing paddock to residential curtilage, erection of a detached leisure outbuilding, plus installation of ground-mounted PV panels.

  18 May 2026 358m away