Planning application
45 Albert Street Windsor SL4 5BT
Works: Loft or dormer
Permission granted. Work must normally begin within three years of the decision or the permission lapses.
Proposal
Certificate of lawfulness to determine whether the proposed 2no. front rooflights and 1no. rear L shaped dormer with rear Juliet balcony are lawful.
As published by the council, reference 26/00939/CPD
Application record
- Reference
- 26/00939/CPD
- Type
- Cert of Lawfulness of Proposed Dev
- Status
- Decided
- Decision
- Granted As published: Permitted Development
- Received
- 15 Apr 2026
- Validated
- 15 Apr 2026
- Decided
- 20 May 2026
- Ward
- Eton And Castle
- Parish
- Windsor Unparished
- Decision by
- Delegated
- Postcode
- SL4 5BT
Timeline
Dates from the published record
-
15 Apr 2026
Received by Windsor and Maidenhead
-
20 May 2026
Decision issued: Permitted Development
-
25 Jul 2026
Added to PlanIndex
Documents
Plans, drawings, consultee responses and the officer's report
12 documents on file for this application
A planning file usually holds the application form, drawings and site plans, consultee responses, the officer's report and the decision notice.
Watch members (£5 a month) open the document list from here.
Open the documentsWhat this grant of permission means
Windsor and Maidenhead granted permission on 20 May 2026, subject to any conditions on the decision notice. Work must normally begin within three years or the permission lapses. More in our guide to what happens after a planning decision.
About lawful development applications
A lawful development certificate is a legal determination that existing or proposed works do not need planning permission; the merits of the scheme are not considered. More in our guide to planning application types.
Nearby applications
Within 0.3 miles
-
44 Albert Street Windsor SL4 5BU
Single storey side/rear extension, first floor rear extension and alterations to fenestration.
Refused Full applications Extension Windows or glazing 10 docsSmall domestic -
113 Clarence Road Windsor SL4 5AR
3no. front rooflights, hip to gable, 1no. rear dormer with Juliet balcony and a single storey rear extension.
Granted Full applications Extension Loft or dormer 20 docsSmall domestic -
99 Clarence Road Windsor SL4 5AR
Certificate of lawfulness to determine whether the proposed 1no. front rooflight, rear hip to gable with Juliet balcony, 2no. side dormers and increase in chimney heights is lawful.
Granted Lawful development Loft or dormer 7 docs -
22 Albert Street Windsor SL4 5BU
Single storey rear extension and 7no. rooflights.
Granted Full applications Extension Loft or dormer 9 docsSmall domestic -
18 Albert Street Windsor SL4 5BU
Single storey side/rear extension with alterations from flat roof to pitch roof and 2 No.additional roof lights.
Granted Full applications Extension Loft or dormer 12 docsSmall domestic -
78 Albert Street Windsor SL4 5BU
Single storey rear extension no greater than 3.92m in depth, 3.51m high with an eaves height of 2.41m.
Granted Prior approval Extension 10 docsSmall domestic
Other lawful development applications
In Windsor and Maidenhead
-
26/02222/CPD Refused
52 Audley Way Ascot SL5 8EF
Certificate of lawfulness to determine whether the proposed single storey rear extension following the removal of the existing conservatory is lawful.
-
26/01954/CPD Withdrawn
Mulberry House Waltham Road Maidenhead SL6 3NH
Certificate of lawfulness to determine whether the single storey rear extension is lawful.
-
26/01856/CLU Granted
Apple Tree Cottage And Land Adjacent To Apple Tree Cottage Paley Street Maidenhead
Certificate of lawfulness to determine whether the existing use of the land as a residential garden incidental to the main dwelling is lawful
-
26/02022/CPD Refused
14 Church View White Waltham Maidenhead SL6 3JQ
Certificate of lawfulness to determine whether the proposed 1no. rear dormer and alterations to fenestration are lawful
-
26/01862/CLU Granted
Holyport Pre School Holyport Youth Club Moneyrow Green Holyport Maidenhead SL6 2NA
Certificate of lawfulness to determine whether the existing use of the site as a pre-school is lawful.