Planning application
Tara House Terrys Lane Cookham Maidenhead SL6 9TJ
Permission granted. Work must normally begin within three years of the decision or the permission lapses.
Proposal
Certificate of lawfulness to determine whether the proposed enlargement of the existing terrace, new swimming pool and detached pool house incidental to the main dwelling are lawful.
As published by the council, reference 26/00165/CPD
Application record
- Reference
- 26/00165/CPD
- Type
- Cert of Lawfulness of Proposed Dev
- Status
- Decided
- Decision
- Granted As published: Permitted Development
- Received
- 21 Jan 2026
- Validated
- 21 Jan 2026
- Decided
- 6 Mar 2026
- Ward
- Bisham And Cookham
- Parish
- Cookham Parish
- Decision by
- Delegated
- Postcode
- SL6 9TJ
Timeline
Dates from the published record
-
21 Jan 2026
Received by Windsor and Maidenhead
-
6 Mar 2026
Decision issued: Permitted Development
-
25 Jul 2026
Added to PlanIndex
Documents
Plans, drawings, consultee responses and the officer's report
7 documents on file for this application
A planning file usually holds the application form, drawings and site plans, consultee responses, the officer's report and the decision notice.
Watch members (£5 a month) open the document list from here.
Open the documentsWhat this grant of permission means
Windsor and Maidenhead granted permission on 6 March 2026, subject to any conditions on the decision notice. Work must normally begin within three years or the permission lapses. More in our guide to what happens after a planning decision.
About lawful development applications
A lawful development certificate is a legal determination that existing or proposed works do not need planning permission; the merits of the scheme are not considered. More in our guide to planning application types.
Nearby applications
Within 0.3 miles
-
Primrose Farm Bradcutts Lane Cookham Dean Maidenhead SL6 9TL
Outline planning application, with all matters reserved apart from scale, for the demolition of the existing workshop and store and the erection of one two-bedroom dwelling.
Granted Outline Demolition 31 docsDomestic -
Primrose Farm Bradcutts Lane Cookham Dean Maidenhead SL6 9TL
Certificate of lawfulness to determine whether the existing use of the yard and buildings as a commercial landscape contractors yard is lawful.
Granted Lawful development 10 docs -
Greythatch Terrys Lane Cookham Maidenhead SL6 9TJ
Single storey rear extension no greater than 6.00m in depth, 3.50m high with an eaves height of 3.00m.
Granted Prior approval Extension 10 docsSmall domestic -
Greythatch Terrys Lane Cookham Maidenhead SL6 9TJ
Single storey rear extension no greater than 6.00m in depth, 3.50m high with an eaves height of 3.00m.
Withdrawn Prior approval Extension 11 docsSmall domestic -
Greythatch Terrys Lane Cookham Maidenhead SL6 9TJ
Certificate of lawfulness to determine whether the proposed detached outbuilding is lawful.
Granted Lawful development 10 docs -
Baddiant Alleyns Lane Cookham Maidenhead SL6 9AE
Certificate of lawfulness to determine whether the single storey indoor swimming pool building ancillary to the dwelling house is lawful.
Granted Lawful development 11 docsSmall domestic
Other lawful development applications
In Windsor and Maidenhead
-
26/01743/CPD Refused
1 Aston Mead Windsor SL4 5PW
Certificate of lawfulness to determine whether the proposed replacement single storey rear extension is lawful.
-
26/01828/CPU Granted
Concorde Park Concorde Road Maidenhead SL6 4FJ
Certificate of lawfulness to determine whether a private hire operators licence for taxi services is lawful.
-
26/01853/CPU Granted
20 Craufurd Rise Maidenhead SL6 7LS
Certificate of lawfulness to determine whether the proposed use of a room on the ground floor as private hire operators licence is lawful.
-
26/01781/CPD Refused
163 Arthur Road Windsor SL4 1RZ
Certificate of lawfulness to determine whether the proposed rear L shaped dormer with Juliet balcony and new air source heat pump are lawful.
-
26/01553/CLU Granted
64 Priors Way Maidenhead SL6 2EN
Certificate of lawfulness to determine whether the existing use of building as self-contained residential dwelling as per details set out in Statutory Declaration is lawful.