Planning application
Vieux Carre 6 Florence Avenue Maidenhead SL6 8SJ
Refused. Only the applicant can appeal, within the statutory time limit, and a revised scheme can be submitted instead.
Proposal
Certificate of lawfulness to determine whether the proposed detached outbuilding incidental to the main dwelling is lawful.
As published by the council, reference 25/03297/CPD
Application record
- Reference
- 25/03297/CPD
- Type
- Cert of Lawfulness of Proposed Dev
- Status
- Decided
- Decision
- Refused As published: Refuse
- Received
- 12 Dec 2025
- Validated
- 12 Dec 2025
- Decided
- 15 Jan 2026
- Ward
- St Marys
- Parish
- Maidenhead Unparished
- Decision by
- Delegated
- Postcode
- SL6 8SJ
Timeline
Dates from the published record
-
12 Dec 2025
Received by Windsor and Maidenhead
-
15 Jan 2026
Decision issued: Refuse
-
11 Aug 2026
Added to PlanIndex
Documents
Plans, drawings, consultee responses and the officer's report
10 documents on file for this application
A planning file usually holds the application form, drawings and site plans, consultee responses, the officer's report and the decision notice.
Watch members (£5 a month) open the document list from here.
Open the documentsWhat this refusal means
Windsor and Maidenhead refused this application for the reasons on the decision notice; only the applicant can appeal, and refused schemes often return in revised form. More in our guide to what happens after a planning decision.
About lawful development applications
A lawful development certificate is a legal determination that existing or proposed works do not need planning permission; the merits of the scheme are not considered. More in our guide to planning application types.
Nearby applications
Within 0.3 miles
-
6 - 8 Florence Avenue Maidenhead
Conversion of the existing garage into a one bedroom apartment with associated parking.
Refused Full applications 23 docs -
6 - 8 Florence Avenue Maidenhead
Conversion of the existing garage into a one bedroom apartment with associated parking.
Withdrawn Full applications 17 docs -
Land At 6 And 8 Florence Avenue Maidenhead
1no. one-bedroom Passivhaus dwelling with solar panels new hardstanding and relocation of the existing drop kerb following the demolition of the existing outbuilding.
Refused Full applications Demolition 40 docsSmall domestic -
17 Florence Avenue Maidenhead SL6 8SJ
Garage conversion, single storey rear extension, alterations to fenestration and a detached outbuilding.
Granted Full applications Extension Windows or glazing 12 docsSmall domestic -
Half Timbers 2 Florence Avenue Maidenhead SL6 8SJ
Two storey side/rear extension, single storey side/rear extension and alterations to fenestration
Granted Full applications Extension Windows or glazing 11 docsSmall domestic -
Eastlea 35 Florence Avenue Maidenhead SL6 8SJ
Certificate of lawfulness to determine whether the proposed removal of 2no. chimneys, alterations to fenestration and external insulation and render to the front and sides of the dwelling is lawful.
Refused Lawful development Windows or glazing 6 docsDomestic
Other lawful development applications
In Windsor and Maidenhead
-
26/02222/CPD Refused
52 Audley Way Ascot SL5 8EF
Certificate of lawfulness to determine whether the proposed single storey rear extension following the removal of the existing conservatory is lawful.
-
26/01954/CPD Withdrawn
Mulberry House Waltham Road Maidenhead SL6 3NH
Certificate of lawfulness to determine whether the single storey rear extension is lawful.
-
26/01856/CLU Granted
Apple Tree Cottage And Land Adjacent To Apple Tree Cottage Paley Street Maidenhead
Certificate of lawfulness to determine whether the existing use of the land as a residential garden incidental to the main dwelling is lawful
-
26/02022/CPD Refused
14 Church View White Waltham Maidenhead SL6 3JQ
Certificate of lawfulness to determine whether the proposed 1no. rear dormer and alterations to fenestration are lawful
-
26/01862/CLU Granted
Holyport Pre School Holyport Youth Club Moneyrow Green Holyport Maidenhead SL6 2NA
Certificate of lawfulness to determine whether the existing use of the site as a pre-school is lawful.