Planning application
23 Hurstwood Ascot SL5 9SP
Works: Extension Windows or glazing Small domestic
Read from the description, not a valuation. How we read the register
Permission granted. Work must normally begin within three years of the decision or the permission lapses.
Proposal
Certificate of lawfulness to determine whether the proposed garage conversion, single storey rear/side extension and alterations to fenestration is lawful.
As published by the council, reference 24/02196/CPD
Application record
- Reference
- 24/02196/CPD
- Type
- Cert of Lawfulness of Proposed Dev
- Status
- Decided
- Decision
- Granted As published: Permitted Development
- Received
- 11 Sep 2024
- Validated
- 11 Sep 2024
- Decided
- 16 Oct 2024
- Ward
- Ascot & Sunninghill
- Parish
- Sunninghill And Ascot Parish
- Decision by
- Delegated
- Postcode
- SL5 9SP
Timeline
Dates from the published record
-
11 Sep 2024
Received by Windsor and Maidenhead
-
16 Oct 2024
Decision issued: Permitted Development
-
8 Sep 2026
Added to PlanIndex
Documents
Plans, drawings, consultee responses and the officer's report
9 documents on file for this application
A planning file usually holds the application form, drawings and site plans, consultee responses, the officer's report and the decision notice.
Watch members (£5 a month) open the document list from here.
Open the documentsWhat this grant of permission means
Windsor and Maidenhead granted permission on 16 October 2024, subject to any conditions on the decision notice. Work must normally begin within three years or the permission lapses. More in our guide to what happens after a planning decision.
About lawful development applications
A lawful development certificate is a legal determination that existing or proposed works do not need planning permission; the merits of the scheme are not considered. More in our guide to planning application types.
Nearby applications
Within 0.3 miles
-
8 Hurstwood Ascot SL5 9SP
Certificate of lawfulness to determine whether the proposed single storey rear extension is lawful.
Granted Lawful development Extension 7 docsSmall domestic -
10 Hurstwood Ascot SL5 9SP
(T1) Acer - crown clean and crown lift to previous points over the road to give up to 5.3m clearance. (002/1990/TPO).
Granted Trees 6 docs -
3 Hurstwood Ascot SL5 9SP
1no. front canopy, part single/part two storey side/rear extension, new roof to existing front bay window, new steps and alterations to fenestration following demolition of existing elements.
Refused Full applications Extension Roofing +2 19 docs -
3 Hurstwood Ascot SL5 9SP
1no. front canopy portico, single storey side/rear extension, new roof to existing front bay window, new flat roof and parapet over existing side extension and new steps following demolition of existing elements.
Granted Full applications Extension Roofing +2 20 docsSmall domestic -
8 Hurstwood Ascot SL5 9SP
(T1) Scots Pine - remove dead wood and (T2) Oak Tree - fell.
Granted Trees 14 docs -
Street Record Queensbury Gardens Ascot
Please see attached listing.(016/1985/TPO)
Granted Trees 7 docs
Other lawful development applications
In Windsor and Maidenhead
-
26/02222/CPD Refused
52 Audley Way Ascot SL5 8EF
Certificate of lawfulness to determine whether the proposed single storey rear extension following the removal of the existing conservatory is lawful.
-
26/01954/CPD Withdrawn
Mulberry House Waltham Road Maidenhead SL6 3NH
Certificate of lawfulness to determine whether the single storey rear extension is lawful.
-
26/01856/CLU Granted
Apple Tree Cottage And Land Adjacent To Apple Tree Cottage Paley Street Maidenhead
Certificate of lawfulness to determine whether the existing use of the land as a residential garden incidental to the main dwelling is lawful
-
26/02022/CPD Refused
14 Church View White Waltham Maidenhead SL6 3JQ
Certificate of lawfulness to determine whether the proposed 1no. rear dormer and alterations to fenestration are lawful
-
26/01862/CLU Granted
Holyport Pre School Holyport Youth Club Moneyrow Green Holyport Maidenhead SL6 2NA
Certificate of lawfulness to determine whether the existing use of the site as a pre-school is lawful.