Planning application
19 Longbourn Windsor SL4 3TN
Refused. Only the applicant can appeal, within the statutory time limit, and a revised scheme can be submitted instead.
Proposal
Certificate of lawfulness to determine whether the siting of a mobile home constructed and assembled to the specifications within the terms of the application, supporting statement and plans, ancillary to the main dwelling is lawful.
As published by the council, reference 22/02541/CPD
Application record
- Reference
- 22/02541/CPD
- Type
- Cert of Lawfulness of Proposed Dev
- Status
- Decided
- Decision
- Refuse
- Received
- 16 Sep 2022
- Validated
- 16 Sep 2022
- Decided
- 14 Dec 2022
- Ward
- Clewer East
- Parish
- Windsor Unparished
- Decision by
- Delegated
- Postcode
- SL4 3TN
Site history
Applications at this address on the Windsor and Maidenhead register
This site has had 3 applications since 2022: 0 approved, 2 refused.
-
23/00491/FULL Refused
19 Longbourn Windsor SL4 3TN
Erection of a single storey granny annexe ancillary to the main dwelling.
-
22/02540/FULL Withdrawn
19 Longbourn Windsor SL4 3TN
Erection of a single storey granny annexe ancillary to the main dwelling.
Timeline
Dates from the published record
-
16 Sep 2022
Received by Windsor and Maidenhead
-
14 Dec 2022
Decision issued: Refuse
-
27 Jul 2026
Added to PlanIndex
Documents
Plans, drawings, consultee responses and the officer's report
9 documents on file for this application
A planning file usually holds the application form, drawings and site plans, consultee responses, the officer's report and the decision notice.
Trade members open them from here.
Open the documentsWhat this refusal means
Windsor and Maidenhead refused this application for the reasons on the decision notice; only the applicant can appeal, and refused schemes often return in revised form. More in our guide to what happens after a planning decision.
About lawful development applications
A lawful development certificate is a legal determination that existing or proposed works do not need planning permission; the merits of the scheme are not considered. More in our guide to planning application types.
Nearby applications
Within 500 metres
-
19 Longbourn Windsor SL4 3TN
Erection of a single storey granny annexe ancillary to the main dwelling.
Withdrawn Full applications 13 docsSmall domestic -
19 Longbourn Windsor SL4 3TN
Erection of a single storey granny annexe ancillary to the main dwelling.
Refused Full applications 16 docsSmall domestic -
16 Bailey Close Windsor SL4 3RD
Single storey rear extension no greater than 4.56m in depth, 3.00m high with an eaves height of 3.00m.
Granted Prior approval Extension 9 docsSmall domestic -
17 Longbourn Windsor SL4 3TN
T1 - English Oak - Tip reduction, reduce the lower eastern sector of the tree canopy to provide branch clearance of 3m from the western elevation and roofline of the garage and the boundary fence with 16 Longbourn (004/1979/TPO).
Granted Trees 5 docsSmall domestic -
-
3 Bailey Close Windsor SL4 3RD
71% historically approved · decision due ~16 Sep
Garage conversion with mono pitched roof and 1 no. front rooflight
Awaiting decision Full applications Loft or dormer 7 docs
Other lawful development applications
In Windsor and Maidenhead
-
26/01743/CPD Refused
1 Aston Mead Windsor SL4 5PW
Certificate of lawfulness to determine whether the proposed replacement single storey rear extension is lawful.
-
26/01828/CPU Granted
Concorde Park Concorde Road Maidenhead SL6 4FJ
Certificate of lawfulness to determine whether a private hire operators licence for taxi services is lawful.
-
26/01853/CPU Granted
20 Craufurd Rise Maidenhead SL6 7LS
Certificate of lawfulness to determine whether the proposed use of a room on the ground floor as private hire operators licence is lawful.
-
26/01781/CPD Refused
163 Arthur Road Windsor SL4 1RZ
Certificate of lawfulness to determine whether the proposed rear L shaped dormer with Juliet balcony and new air source heat pump are lawful.
-
26/01553/CLU Granted
64 Priors Way Maidenhead SL6 2EN
Certificate of lawfulness to determine whether the existing use of building as self-contained residential dwelling as per details set out in Statutory Declaration is lawful.