Planning application
18 St Marks Place Windsor SL4 3BG
Permission granted. Work must normally begin within three years of the decision or the permission lapses.
Proposal
Certificate of lawfulness to determine whether the proposed detached outbuilding (measuring 4.3m by 1.8m with a height of 2.5m) is lawful.
As published by the council, reference 22/00059/CPD
Application record
- Reference
- 22/00059/CPD
- Type
- Cert of Lawfulness of Proposed Dev
- Status
- Decided
- Decision
- Granted As published: Permitted Development
- Received
- 10 Jan 2022
- Validated
- 12 Jan 2022
- Decided
- 28 Mar 2022
- Ward
- Eton And Castle
- Parish
- Windsor Unparished
- Postcode
- SL4 3BG
Site history
Applications at this address on the Windsor and Maidenhead register
This site has had 2 applications since 2020: 2 approved, 0 refused.
-
20/03346/FULL Granted
18 St Marks Place Windsor SL4 3BG
Single storey side and rear extensions following demolition of existing single storey rear extension
Timeline
Dates from the published record
-
10 Jan 2022
Received by Windsor and Maidenhead
-
12 Jan 2022
Validated
Checked as complete and ready for consideration.
-
28 Mar 2022
Decision issued: Permitted Development
-
16 Aug 2026
Added to PlanIndex
Documents
Plans, drawings, consultee responses and the officer's report
6 documents on file for this application
A planning file usually holds the application form, drawings and site plans, consultee responses, the officer's report and the decision notice.
Watch members (£5 a month) open the document list from here.
Open the documentsWhat this grant of permission means
Windsor and Maidenhead granted permission on 28 March 2022, subject to any conditions on the decision notice. Work must normally begin within three years or the permission lapses. More in our guide to what happens after a planning decision.
About lawful development applications
A lawful development certificate is a legal determination that existing or proposed works do not need planning permission; the merits of the scheme are not considered. More in our guide to planning application types.
Nearby applications
Within 0.3 miles
-
18 St Marks Place Windsor SL4 3BG
Single storey side and rear extensions following demolition of existing single storey rear extension
Granted Full applications Extension Demolition 20 docsSmall domestic -
15 Queens Road Windsor SL4 3BQ
x1 front rooflight and x1 rear dormer.
Granted Full applications Loft or dormer 16 docs -
15 Queens Road Windsor SL4 3BQ
L shaped rear dormer to provide additional accommodation in roof space.
Withdrawn Full applications Loft or dormer 14 docs -
17 Queens Road Windsor SL4 3BQ
Single storey side/rear extension
Granted Full applications Extension 10 docsSmall domestic -
17 Queens Road Windsor SL4 3BQ
Single storey side/rear extension
Granted Full applications Extension 13 docsSmall domestic -
17 Queens Road Windsor SL4 3BQ
Variation (under Section 73) of planning permission 20/00908/FULL to vary the wording of Condition 1 (Commencement - Full Application 3 Years).
Withdrawn Amendments 6 docs
Other lawful development applications
In Windsor and Maidenhead
-
26/02222/CPD Refused
52 Audley Way Ascot SL5 8EF
Certificate of lawfulness to determine whether the proposed single storey rear extension following the removal of the existing conservatory is lawful.
-
26/01954/CPD Withdrawn
Mulberry House Waltham Road Maidenhead SL6 3NH
Certificate of lawfulness to determine whether the single storey rear extension is lawful.
-
26/01856/CLU Granted
Apple Tree Cottage And Land Adjacent To Apple Tree Cottage Paley Street Maidenhead
Certificate of lawfulness to determine whether the existing use of the land as a residential garden incidental to the main dwelling is lawful
-
26/02022/CPD Refused
14 Church View White Waltham Maidenhead SL6 3JQ
Certificate of lawfulness to determine whether the proposed 1no. rear dormer and alterations to fenestration are lawful
-
26/01862/CLU Granted
Holyport Pre School Holyport Youth Club Moneyrow Green Holyport Maidenhead SL6 2NA
Certificate of lawfulness to determine whether the existing use of the site as a pre-school is lawful.